THE KING Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 You have changed your tune, earlier you said he was..... The Suns view idiot ..not mine 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 No you don't and have said so on this very thread Yes I do, and no I haven't. Unless, of course, you'd have us believe that the Divide is between celtic and rangers? Yet again, you try to reduce a disdain for all discrimination and prejudice to simplistic terms. The fact that I have been verbally and physically abused because of my upbringing by people following the "sporting" representative of one side of the divide does not imply sympathy for the other side. Only in the world where you have to be one or the other could this be seen to be the case. Maybe if you could send a questionaire round the afterlife and ask any victim of the troubles how much of a fúck they cared which school the bombmaker who shortened their life went to? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Rangers (or Celtic for that matter) fans calling the other side bigots always makes me roll my eyes. See? ---------> A large chunk of the fan base of either club is riddled with fucking bigotry. "You're a bigot" "Naw, you're a bigot" I've said it before and I'll say it again; it's like one shite calling another shite smelly. Let the diddies call both sides bigots - take it on the chin - and move the f**k on. Phil's a fucking moron and doesn't reflect me or my views. I'm sure lots of the berz feel the same about that McMurdo tool. Now........ Are they deid yet? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henrik's tongue Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 What has Bill said to upset you now? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 The link was there with it, if you have a sun account then use it if you feel that I had some other motive...or that I missed something then it should be easy enough to prove(1). You never asked for the entire post...you asked for the entire article. It absolutely is coincidence, but getting two replies to a post is not exactly a big coincidence.(2) 1. Well, you missed the other article which your opposite number posted from the Guardian, which gives a wee bit of context, as well as being an object lesson in how, the lower the demographic of your target audience, the quicker you can change your moral stance in order to maintain sales. Maybe you weren't aware of it - I wasn't, but it should at least raise questions about your fellow follow followers' actions. 2. Napoleon? Check. Snowball? Check. OK, chaps, you are cleared for take-off... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podlie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 SSN Rangers lost appeal for fine for cheating...old club was liquidated then reformed. ...beautiful. RNS Number : 1834C Rangers Int. Football Club PLC 14 January 2015 14 January 2015 Rangers International Football Club plc ("Rangers" or the "Company") Scottish Professional Football League Limited ("SPFL") Claim Further to the announcement on 17 December 2014, Rangers Football Club Limited (the "Club") lost the appeal with the Judicial Panel of the Scottish FA on 13 January 2015 in respect of the EBT Commission fine of £250,000 levied on RFC 2012 PLC (previously The Rangers Football Club plc) (in liquidation). The Club will now take the matter to arbitration. For further information please contact: Rangers International Football Club plc Tel: 0141 580 8647 David Somers WH Ireland Limited Tel: 020 7220 1666 Adrian Hadden / Paul Shackleton Newgate Threadneedle Tel: 020 7148 6143 Roddy Watt / Ed Treadwell 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 (previously The Rangers Football Club plc) (in liquidation). -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 RNS Number : 1834C Rangers Int. Football Club PLC 14 January 2015 Further to the announcement on 17 December 2014, Rangers Football Club Limited (the "Club") lost the appeal with the Judicial Panel of the Scottish FA on 13 January 2015 in respect of the EBT Commission fine of £250,000 levied on RFC 2012 PLC (previously The Rangers Football Club plc) (in liquidation). The Club will now take the matter to arbitration. So, they get fined but refuse to pay and appeal. The appeal goes against them, so now they take it to arbitration. How many chances do they get? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Telfer money..same club...any debts..different club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 1. Well, you missed the other article which your opposite number posted from the Guardian, which gives a wee bit of context, I'm guessing that the Guardian article was written by Philips good friend Roy Greensnake? (lol) Wait...you asked for the actual article where the quotes originated but what you really wanted was an article from another newspaper? really? your communication skills are bloody awful. Norman aint right in the head. Telfer money..same club...any debts..different club. Do you even know what you're posting half the time? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEADOWXI Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) But the January wage bill is covered. The semi final ticket money they taking in this week, all in cash as no credit card facilities doesn't need to be passed onto SPFL till ten days after game. Good luck on the league collecting that as they continue to rob Peter to pay Paul as the old saying goes..... Edited January 14, 2015 by MEADOWXI -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Yes I do, and no I haven't Yes you did. We have had this conversation before and it never ends well for you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 I'm guessing that the Guardian article was written by Philips good friend Roy Greensnake? (lol) Norman aint right in the head. Do you even know what you're posting half the time? Half the time yes..that still puts me ahead of you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 (edited) It's going to be interesting to see how the NewCo argues its case in front of the arbitrators. The easiest way to dodge the fine would be to say - we have no connection whatsoever with the deceased entity known as "Rangers FC", but that would be a catastrophic propaganda blunder with the fans, likely to cost the NewCo far more money in the long run than just ponying up the quarter-million right now. I actually think they'd have a fairly strong case that they're not liable, if they chose to make that argument. If they want to keep the zoomers onside though, they're effectively going to have to fight with one hand behind their backs by restricting their argument to the agreement with the authorities. I'd say we're about to find out just how attached the money men at Ibrox are to the continuation story, and how far they see their investment as a long haul to be protected. Edited January 14, 2015 by flyingrodent 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Norman really doesn't like anyone being critical of or mocking Philip, strange behaviour from the die hard Killie fan.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 It's going to be interesting to see how the NewCo argues its case in front of the arbitrators. The easiest way to dodge the fine would be to say - we have no connection whatsoever with the deceased entity known as "Rangers FC", but that would be a catastrophic propaganda blunder with the fans, likely to cost the NewCo far more money in the long run than just ponying up the quarter-million right now. I actually think they'd have a fairly strong case that they're not liable, if they chose to make that argument. If they want to keep the zoomers onside though, they're effectively going to have to fight with one hand behind their backs by restricting their argument to the agreement with the authorities. I'd say we're about to find out just how attached the money men at Ibrox are to the continuation story, and how far they see their investment as a long haul to be protected. they're not trying to get away with paying I think they're trying to get access to the money as the sfa have it. They should try looking down the back of the sofa they may find some money down there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Strange behaviour from the SPFL and SFA boards here, we all know that at the time the fine was for oldco and not newco. This was made very clear and the matter was ended and it has to be asked why wait so long before demanding that this money be paid. Some people may also say that either the SPFL is in financial trouble and needs this money badly (and don't care how they get it) or that this is malicious act from them with one purpose in mind (especially when the club is in chaos at the moment). Obviously these are at this moment not my views as i'm still pondering all of this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 See, this where you let yourself down, instead of being desperate to just have a dig, it may be a good idea to just read the conversation to check what was asked for. The original request. Now he was quite specific...the source material...no editorial comments...no spin were the requests of the day. I obliged and copied the entire article straight from the sun and the man who made those comments...not even the slightest cherry was picked. Not content with this, yer mate attacks me...why? because I did not supply another article that was not the source material but was full of editorial comment and spin. I do not mind when you make a chunt of yerself...honest. Except you didn't post the article from the Sun, did you? You copy and pasted an old post from P&B. As you say, I specifically asked for the source material. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Except you didn't post the article from the Sun, did you? You copy and pasted an old post from P&B. As you say, I specifically asked for the source material. It's not like you don't know that the sun is now behind a pay wall Norman, so please for the love of God stop being such a fud. Philips a bigot and that is that and all your tears won't change that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 14, 2015 Share Posted January 14, 2015 Back on topic. Do sevco have enough cash to pay wages and keep the lights on for the rest of the month.? And how many times tonight will Bennett and tedi mention wrk(Norman) in a post just to deflect from the clusters£&k of a club/company? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.