forever_blue Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Good wan. Off topic I've a large wager on Man Utd..one more should be enough. Sare yin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Why on earth would I be in favour of lying? Or whatever the Hell you're attempting to actually say? That's not what I said 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Just popped in to see if MrXs warnings w.....oh forger it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Very touching to see the Ps&Ds out in full force to mourn the passing of Spiers and Heggarty from The Herald. They will be very proud of you. Just a shame that the cancellation of their contracts had the square root of hee haw to do with Rangers but was all about ego and narcissism. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Loving the rangers fans getting all excited about a journalist not telling the truth but forgetting that the chairman is a glib and shameless liar who promised to overspend to get "back were they belong" and yet has had to borrow money to pay off loans and get players on loan as they can't afford to buy any. Which journalist didn't tell the truth? I assume you're referring to that coerced apology? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 That's not what I said Explain what you did say then. It's seldom clear. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 No I am fucking pissing myself laughing at it. Honestly turning into shull as we speak. Jeez. Your descent has overtaken Kincardine's. Can we really no longer discuss the issues rationally Ted? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Explain what you did say then. It's seldom clear. Well dave claimed the herald might have sacked them due to pressure from an advertiser connected to rangers , the herald stated in their statement this was not the case , so i hoped dave was not going to accuse the herald of lying about that fact based soley on his hatred of rangers , as the honourable monkey would be disgusted at such an accusation 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Jeez. Your descent has overtaken Kincardine's. Oh Monkey. How seriously you take this! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Charlottes back....... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Is there a point to this post ? Yes, several points actually, but I'd imagine they'd have escaped you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yes, several points actually, but I'd imagine they'd have escaped you. The apotheosis of high dudgeon. How's the passive/aggressive thing working out for you Monkey? How comfortable are you in following Rangers fans about the board and posting the same shite? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Somehow I do not think you are in a rational state of mind, you rarely are these days. Think I will just giggle at you instead. I'm perfectly rational Ted, which we both know. I explain what I post and although I wouldn't claim to be devoid of prejudices of my own, I try to reason my way through it all. I know you now mock the sentiment, but you once did the same. You really did, you know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flyingrodent Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The really remarkable thing here is an editor refusing to stand behind one of his hacks who insists point blank that he heard a person make a statement. A hack who's willing to sacrifice a good paycheque for a cushy job on principle, no less. It's hard to explain how rare it is, for this kind of thing to happen - for an editor to jettison a hack and cave to pressure. Maybe the BBC with Andrew Gilligan, when they were in direct confrontation with the UK Government over the Iraq War. Editors are usually required to stand behind their hacks, much like chimney sweeps are required to sweep chimneys. And that's all gone out of the window, for Rangers. That's how odd it is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Well dave claimed the herald might have sacked them due to pressure from an advertiser connected to rangers , the herald stated in their statement this was not the case , so i hoped dave was not going to accuse the herald of lying about that fact based soley on his hatred of rangers , as the honourable monkey would be disgusted at such an accusation Fair enough. I wouldn't totally disregard the notion of advertising revenue, but I don't know that it necessarily featured here. The establishment, you see. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-MAN Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Charlottes back....... And he has the emails 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The apotheosis of high dudgeon. How's the passive/aggressive thing working out for you Monkey? How comfortable are you in following Rangers fans about the board and posting the same shite? I've just been following the thread. I've not been following any individual. Why the outright aggression? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 The really remarkable thing here is an editor refusing to stand behind one of his hacks who insists point blank that he heard a person make a statement. A hack who's willing to sacrifice a good paycheque for a cushy job on principle, no less. It's hard to explain how rare it is, for this kind of thing to happen - for an editor to jettison a hack and cave to pressure. Maybe the BBC with Andrew Gilligan, when they were in direct confrontation with the UK Government over the Iraq War. Editors are usually required to stand behind their hacks, much like chimney sweeps are required to sweep chimneys. And that's all gone out of the window, for Rangers. That's how odd it is. "Something inside so strong" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Parks of Hamilton. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 Yes, several points actually, but I'd imagine they'd have escaped you. Apart from the this is your life type introductions to jum and spiers what on earth was it ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.