H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 a member of the Advisory Council to the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology And it's Roland. Wow... the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology you say! Who better to ask about International Law than an Economist! Does he have any views on string theory? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 You'd be as well asking Ronald McDonald about it. This guy did PPE as his undergraduate and did a Masters in economics. Did Ronald McDonald go to the Universities of Munich, Oxford and Columbia then? Does he teach economics at Mannheim Uni? We can all Google, sonny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Are the nat blogs peddling the same sort of wrist clapping fail that Baxter is coming away with here or something? Or are him and XBL simply enjoying winding up Ad Lib and HB? Either way, it hasn't worked out well for either of them. Also rattled ^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Wow... the German Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology you say! Who better to ask about International Law than an Economist! Does he have any views on string theory? So...no answer then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 . I'll also be interested to hear Alistair Darling's opinion on why the BT campaign wasn't good enough for Labour. It's clearly a split of some kind. . I'll also be interested to hear Alistair Darling's opinion on why the BT campaign wasn't good enough for Labour. This has been explained multiple times. Labour are still invovled with BT, they are also running their own distinct campaign. Why is this so difficult to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Did Ronald McDonald go to the Universities of Munich, Oxford and Columbia then? Does he teach economics at Mannheim Uni? We can all Google, sonny. Unfortunately for you, you can't even Google well. So, have you thought about "whatever" reason it is that South Sudan are a new state under international law? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 So...no answer then? What was the question? I wasn't aware one had been asked. I've asked you a question though. Go on, have a go at answering it. I could do with a laugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the jambo-rocker Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This has been explained multiple times. Labour are still invovled with BT, they are also running their own distinct campaign. Why is this so difficult to understand? I have simply stated it is a pretty much a lateral move even if it does alledgedly appeal to the working class, or am I missing something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Incidentally, anyone remember when HB and Ad Lib claimed that David Scheffer knew nothing about international law and was actually a criminal lawyer and clown? That would be David Scheffer, American Ambassador, who teaches international law, runs a large international law institute, and started his career practicing international law. But is also a "clown", a "nobody", and is less qualified than HB and Ad Lib. So I'd take their sneers with a degree of caution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xbl Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This has been explained multiple times. Labour are still invovled with BT, they are also running their own distinct campaign. Why is this so difficult to understand?As are the Yes campaign and the parties within. We just wonder why the papers weren't bigging up tales of "Splits" and "CIVIL WAR", like they do for the independence side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Unfortunately for you, you can't even Google well. So, have you thought about "whatever" reason it is that South Sudan are a new state under international law? Deflection! A point to me, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Incidentally, anyone remember when HB and Ad Lib claimed that David Scheffer knew nothing about international law and was actually a criminal lawyer and clown? I still say he is a clown and he is indeed a criminal lawyer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Deflection! A point to me, I think. Yes, keep dreaming. It's already 6-0 5-0 and 40-0, and your first serve has hit the fence. Deflection indeed though. Why won't you answer the question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This has been explained multiple times. Labour are still invovled with BT, they are also running their own distinct campaign. Why is this so difficult to understand? It hasn't been explained at all, why would Labour need their own distinctive campaign? Isn't the case for the Union perfectly straightforward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Yes, keep dreaming. It's already 6-0 5-0 and 40-0, and your first serve has hit the fence. Deflection indeed though. Why won't you answer the question? The ball's in the net and you're weeping in the dressing room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 I have simply stated it is a pretty much a lateral move even if it does alledgedly appeal to the working class, or am I missing something? You called it rank hypocrisy a few posts ago As are the Yes campaign and the parties within. We just wonder why the papers weren't bigging up tales of "Splits" and "CIVIL WAR", like they do for the independence side. Are there distinct Green and SNP campaigns, in the vein of what Labour launched yesterday? I haven't seen anything? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 The ball's in the net and you're weeping in the dressing room. Yes, if you aren't going to answer the question, and are instead going to toddle off with your tailk between your legs, like yesterday's humiliating climbdown, that's fine. Cowardly, but understandable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Incidentally, anyone remember when HB and Ad Lib claimed that David Scheffer knew nothing about international law and was actually a criminal lawyer and clown? That would be David Scheffer, American Ambassador, who teaches international law, runs a large international law institute, and started his career practicing international law. But is also a "clown", a "nobody", and is less qualified than HB and Ad Lib. So I'd take their sneers with a degree of caution. I'll take Roland Vaubels's education over Ad Lib's HND in Hotel Management any day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 Yes, if you aren't going to answer the question, and are instead going to toddle off with your tailk between your legs, like yesterday's humiliating climbdown, that's fine. Cowardly, but understandable. Frantic ^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 14, 2013 Share Posted May 14, 2013 This really has been a disaster for you hasn't it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.