Todders Posted May 29, 2014 Share Posted May 29, 2014 Salmond cancelled. Alexander said so himself and issued another challenge. Oh...if Danny Alexander said it then it MUST be true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellfan09 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Just to check renton, is there a democratic deficit for the people of Yorkshire? They didn't elect a Conservative/Lib Dem government. Right. Do the people of the Shetland Islands have a democratic deficit in Scotland? They didn't vote for the SNP and their votes don't directly affect election results, so I guess they must have. Lot of democratic deficits about! So your point is, in an election covering 65 million people, 5 million people don't decide the result? Wow. In the Scottish election, the people of Falkirk don't directly get to elect the government. I think this is disgraceful. Why should the party I vote for not get in every time! What a fucking tedious argument but I guess that's no surprise when you consider who's making it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Salmond all talk, does not want to debate with anybody, he is full of "wind and" well you know the rest I am surprised. It's not like a No voter to offer up a barefaced lie like this. How peculiar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Just to reiterate, I gthink we'll get salmond v darling at soem point, and that'll be the only debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Just to reiterate, I gthink we'll get salmond v darling at soem point, and that'll be the only debate. I think that's unlikely. Remember Darling has been replaced in the Better Together campaign. By.. someone. There was a thread on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I think that's unlikely. Remember Darling has been replaced in the Better Together campaign. By.. someone. There was a thread on it. Oh aye, a triumph of folk not reading an article to the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deky Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Just to reiterate, I gthink we'll get salmond v darling at soem point, and that'll be the only debate. I thought you'd be pushing for a Galloway v Salmond debate. That Labour leash obviously still cuts deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 A one-on-one debate is a stupid idea because both campaigns take in a broad range of views from both sides of the political spectrum. I'd prefer to see a 3 part series involving Alex Salmond, Patrick Harvie, Colin Fox, Ruth Davidson, Willie Rennie and Alistair Darling. The first part would look at domestic affairs, the second part would look at defence and foreign affairs, and the final part would be based on the economy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deky Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 A one-on-one debate is a stupid idea because both campaigns take in a broad range of views from both sides of the political spectrum. I'd prefer to see a 3 part series involving Alex Salmond, Patrick Harvie, Colin Fox, Ruth Davidson, Willie Rennie and Alistair Darling. The first part would look at domestic affairs, the second part would look at defence and foreign affairs, and the final part would be based on the economy. Surely Lamont should replace Darling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Surely Lamont should replace Darling? I came up with the idea so I will fucking decide who's involved, thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confidemus Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I came up with the idea so I will fucking decide who's involved, thank you very much. ^^^ get her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banterman86 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I thought you'd be pushing for a Galloway v Salmond debate. That Labour leash obviously still cuts deep. Galloway v Sheridan has a certain rubbernecking quality to it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Surely Lamont should replace Darling?She is debater of the year after all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harry94 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 A one-on-one debate is a stupid idea because both campaigns take in a broad range of views from both sides of the political spectrum. I'd prefer to see a 3 part series involving Alex Salmond, Patrick Harvie, Colin Fox, Ruth Davidson, Willie Rennie and Alistair Darling. The first part would look at domestic affairs, the second part would look at defence and foreign affairs, and the final part would be based on the economy. I see where you're coming from but when you have that many people on a panel the whole thing just sounds more rehearsed and the average voter won't really learn anything new. Those on each side will try to play happy family so that will kill the debate. I suppose the more coverage the better though. I don't want one debate; I'd like at least ten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 I am surprised. It's not like a No voter to offer up a barefaced lie like this. How peculiar. Salmond debates Alexander, wins, no one cares, Salmond debates Darling, wins, no one cares, Salmond debates Cameron, wins, no one cares, Salmond debates either of them and loses, he and the YES campaign are TOAST!, that is why he will run a mile from a debate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Ecto my man, Salmond wouldn't lose.Problem is we will never find out, Eck is running scared Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Problem is we will never find out, Eck is running scared Bad troll trolls bad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Bad troll trolls bad Is that the same as "the truth hurts"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milton75 Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 Is that the same as "the truth hurts"? No. It's the same as ignoring a moronic flat-earther. If you have proof to support your assertion that Salmond ran away from this debate that was going to happen, post it. Linking specifically to quotes. Should be easy, given the media attention and that you said it happened. Otherwise, don't be surprised when people call you a bullshitting troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ecto Posted May 30, 2014 Share Posted May 30, 2014 No. It's the same as ignoring a moronic flat-earther. If you have proof to support your assertion that Salmond ran away from this debate that was going to happen, post it. Linking specifically to quotes. Should be easy, given the media attention and that you said it happened. Otherwise, don't be surprised when people call you a bullshitting troll. Yoinks, the truth does hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.