Burma Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So... any chance of some evidence to support your stance that the text of the Claim of Right Act to any extent whatsoever supports your popular sovereignty account of Scottish constitutional law? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 At the risk of diverting the thread from this highly entertaining and pertinent topic, has anyone pointed out to Reynard the quote in his sig is from Henry McLeish, not Salmond? It isn't. Unlucky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 It isn't. Unlucky Yes it is. To clear up. http://www.scotsman....leish-1-1978035 Quote Mr McLeish, who supports full financial powers for Holyrood, or “devo max”, said: “It’s a Scottish matter and the mischief making that we’ve seen at Westminster isn’t of any help. Westminster should keep out of the referendum and not meddle. “How can anyone at Westminster be so divorced from reality to deliver an insult to the Scottish people in this way and to heap contempt upon them. “It would be insulting and contemptuous to the Scottish people for Westminster to get involved and anyone suggesting this at Westminster needs to grow-up instead of ranting in an anti-Scottish way. So as I said before, apart from the person, the year and the context in which it was used, Reynard is bang on with his signature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Yes it is. To clear up. http://www.scotsman....leish-1-1978035 Quote So as I said before, apart from the person, the year and the context in which it was used, Reynard is bang on with his signature. I am indeed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So you conceed that it wasn't Alex Salmond who said it then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 So you conceed that it wasn't Alex Salmond who said it then? There is the quote below. Read it and weep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 There is the quote below. Read it and weep. Ah I see, well I suppose we can all make things up. "I've changed my mind, I'll be voting Yes next year. Also, Greenock Morton are ace" Reynard 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Ah I see, well I suppose we can all make things up. "I've changed my mind, I'll be voting Yes next year. Also, Greenock Morton are ace" Reynard 2013 Yours is ridiculous though. I have another one coming up. I,m sure you'll like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Finally admitted defeat on that one, well done Reynard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Finally admitted defeat on that one, well done Reynard It took a while, but well played. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H_B Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Has this Burma clown done this shit in college too or something? I'm not sure he even has. In some ways, he's been unlucky. I'm sure this wise "knowledgeable" act plays well in Labrador Nat circles. He's probably referred to as "The Prof" or "our legal expert" amongst the stupid Nat clown collective. Unfortunately, there are actually people here, Ad Lib and I, who understand law, having studied it. Unlike chicBurma. Which means, surprise surprise, that his cut and pastes from terrible websites that can't spell David Hume's name right, are quickly and thoroughly shredded. Leaving him the bumbling, shambolic, incoherent mess he has become on this thread. As I said before. A salutory lesson. One I hope he has learned from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I'm not sure he even has. In some ways, he's been unlucky. I'm sure this wise "knowledgeable" act plays well in Labrador Nat circles. He's probably referred to as "The Prof" or "our legal expert" amongst the stupid Nat clown collective. Unfortunately, there are actually people here, Ad Lib and I, who understand law, having studied it. Unlike chicBurma. Which means, surprise surprise, that his cut and pastes from terrible websites that can't spell David Hume's name right, are quickly and thoroughly shredded. Leaving him the bumbling, shambolic, incoherent mess he has become on this thread. As I said before. A salutory lesson. One I hope he has learned from. You hitting the drink early today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam. Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 It isn't. Unlucky I see you've changed it. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I'm not sure he even has. In some ways, he's been unlucky. I'm sure this wise "knowledgeable" act plays well in Labrador Nat circles. He's probably referred to as "The Prof" or "our legal expert" amongst the stupid Nat clown collective. Unfortunately, there are actually people here, Ad Lib and I, who understand law, having studied it. Unlike chicBurma. Which means, surprise surprise, that his cut and pastes from terrible websites that can't spell David Hume's name right, are quickly and thoroughly shredded. Leaving him the bumbling, shambolic, incoherent mess he has become on this thread. As I said before. A salutory lesson. One I hope he has learned from. :lol: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1320Lichtie Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 You hitting the drink early today? Don't think he has been aff it mate! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reynard Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 I see you've changed it. Thanks. Yes this one is even better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wingsoverperthshire Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 Nothing wrong with Salmonds quote its absolutely factual Reynard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 You hitting the drink early today? 1. Do you stand by your assertion that section 5 an 30 of the Scotland Act are relevant to the Axa General Insurance v Lord Advocate case? 2. Do you have any verbatim evidence in the Claim of Right Act 1689 that the people of Scotland, and not the Parliament of Scotland, were asserting a sovereign right to remove the monarch? 3. Do you have evidence for your assertion that Lord Cooper endorsed the principle of the sovereignty of the people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 In respect of the post that you are replying to, I have left your the relevant points in the above quote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ad Lib Posted December 12, 2013 Share Posted December 12, 2013 1. Do you stand by your assertion that section 5 an 30 of the Scotland Act are relevant to the Axa General Insurance v Lord Advocate case? 2. Do you have any verbatim evidence in the Claim of Right Act 1689 that the people of Scotland, and not the Parliament of Scotland, were asserting a sovereign right to remove the monarch? 3. Do you have evidence for your assertion that Lord Cooper endorsed the principle of the sovereignty of the people? In respect of the post that you are replying to, I have left your the relevant points in the above quote. Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.