JMDP Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 This named person scheme sounds utterly bizarre. I've been told at work I could be one but I had no idea what it was. That's because you are pretty thick tbf. It is fairly straightforward. As a primary teacher in London, I would like a scheme with the same principle rolled out down here. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BerwickMad Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 That's because you are pretty thick tbf. It is fairly straightforward. As a primary teacher in London, I would like a scheme with the same principle rolled out down here.More likely it hasn't been well explained. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 More likely it hasn't been well explained. No one on the Panel managed to explain it properly either last night, but it's Ok, the P&B Nats have got it all sussed, anyone else who has the audacity to question how this SNP policy will work in practice is just thick! On a separate note, what an absolute c*nt Hamza Yousaf is, a mouthy professional politician and the epitome of a bitter seething Scottish Nationalist. He couldn't manage one single answer last night without an attack on the UK/UK Government, nothing else matters, his judgement is completely blinded by a naked hatred for all things British. Who needs enemies with friends like that etc.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Who needs enemies with friends like that etc.. I doubt he would consider seething Mason Boyne types as his friends to be honest. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Rob playing the 'enemies' card again. Humza isn't even a kafflicky name as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMDP Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 More likely it hasn't been well explained. It is a very straightforward scheme clouded by utter nonsense in the media. Do some reading. Not a surprise to see resident frother redrob getting his panties in a mess watching a confident, articulate politician represent the most trusted government in Europe. -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 It is a very straightforward scheme clouded by utter nonsense in the media. Do some reading. Not a surprise to see resident frother redrob getting his panties in a mess watching a confident, articulate politician represent the most trusted government in Europe. Aye, so trusted, it lost seats last Thursday, so trusted it governs by a minority. There's no froth here, just a quiet knowing that the belief's that Hamza holds about Britain and Scotland's partnership within the Union were firmly rejected by the electorate in Sept 2014. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Aye, so trusted, it lost seats last Thursday, so trusted it governs by a minority. There's no froth here, just a quiet knowing that the belief's that Hamza holds about Britain and Scotland's partnership within the Union were firmly rejected by the electorate in Sept 2014. Hiya David Coburn, hiya pal 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antiochas III Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Aye, so trusted, it lost seats last Thursday, so trusted it governs by a minority. There's no froth here, just a quiet knowing that the belief's that Hamza holds about Britain and Scotland's partnership within the Union were firmly rejected by the electorate in Sept 2014. You're actually seething. Bringing up September 2014 in a discussion on the named person scheme For the record, once it goes to vote the NPS will pass with flying colours without much of a chance of failing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 NPS breaks the parental monopoly on how children are brought up, very good policy IMO 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 No one on the Panel managed to explain it properly either last night, but it's Ok, the P&B Nats have got it all sussed, anyone else who has the audacity to question how this SNP policy will work in practice is just thick! In all fairness, you've ably demonstrated yourself to be a fucking moron on many, many occasions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rugster Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Jim Sillars makes a compelling case for a Brexit. Jim Sillars makes a compelling case for euthanasia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Jim Sillars makes a compelling case for euthanasia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 I'm not sure if rugster understood the double entendre he just made 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Fluffy Mundell really suits his beard. I wasn't aware he was still married. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 I find it strange that it's always the unionist parties bringing up the subject of another referendum. Can they not move on from it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Aye, so trusted, it lost seats last Thursday, so trusted it governs by a minority. There's no froth here, just a quiet knowing that the belief's that Hamza holds about Britain and Scotland's partnership within the Union were firmly rejected by the electorate in Sept 2014. What a seething unionist mess you truly are Rob! Is "lost seats" the best you can come up with? How about the SNP gaining 234,000 more votes than in 2011? How about getting more constituency votes than your Tories and Labour combined? How about winning in 6 out of 7 of Scotland's cities? How about being returned for a historic third term? How about a party getting over 1,000,000 votes for the first time in a Scottish election? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 What a seething unionist mess you truly are Rob! Is "lost seats" the best you can come up with? How about the SNP gaining 234,000 more votes than in 2011? How about getting more constituency votes than your Tories and Labour combined? How about winning in 6 out of 7 of Scotland's cities? How about being returned for a historic third term? How about a party getting over 1,000,000 votes for the first time in a Scottish election? After the UK parties bleating on about how the WM and SP elections are completely different, they are now scrambling to show the difference in the numbers voting SNP between the two, completely different, elections. Did you know that the SNP lost 400k votes? No. Me neither. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 The Named Persons Act seems like an inherently good idea and appears to be tightening up things that already exist (or did exist, certainly from my own experience). Credit where credit is due though, the tabloid press have managed to make it sound like some sort of totalitarian way of the state bringing up your child with parents ending up in the Caithness gulags. And, going by the QT audience last night, a lot of people have lapped it up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 You could put it like that or you could say that the government hasn't explained it very well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.