Yank Mike Posted May 12, 2016 Share Posted May 12, 2016 Trump has closed a 13 point gap in the Reuters poll in one week. It's not 41% Clinton, 40% Trump, and 19% undecided. Check out the latest ad from each campaign to see why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted May 13, 2016 Share Posted May 13, 2016 Trump's old butler believes Obama should be killed. This is making worldwide headlines. I get that Trump is a fud, but is there really any need for such a widespread smear campaign over, ultimately, irrelevant information? Trump has more than enough areas to attack without resorting to gutter journalism. And going by the primaries, the more negative press Trump gets, the more people vote for him... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted May 14, 2016 Share Posted May 14, 2016 Looks like ol Billy Boy is still up to his old tricks. http://nypost.com/2016/05/13/clinton-charity-arranged-2m-pledge-to-company-owned-by-bills-friend/ Clinton charity arranged $2M pledge to firm owned by Bill’s ‘friend’ And it looks like he was taking even more rides than previously known on pervert Jeffery Epstein's sex plane. Turns out there were 26 trips instead of 11, and he ditched his secret service detail for 5 of these previously unreported flights. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/05/13/flight-logs-show-bill-clinton-flew-on-sex-offenders-jet-much-more-than-previously-known.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Worktheshaft Posted May 16, 2016 Share Posted May 16, 2016 !5Four Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banana Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 What a corrupt farce by Clinton in Nevada now, why does Sanders even bother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 What a corrupt farce by Clinton in Nevada now, why does Sanders even bother You mean that Sanders caucus bullies weren't able to change the result of the first poll?http://www.thepeoplesview.net/main/2016/4/4/ratfucking-in-nevada-the-sanders-campaign-just-made-the-most-effective-case-for-superdelegates-to-back-clinton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Clinton won Nevada. The Sanders folks were trying to finagle delegates through backroom parliamentary procedures and the Democrat bigwigs shut them down by ignoring the official rules. Side bar: Trump people had their delegates stolen in scores of states they actually won. No riots. The Sanders people responded by causing a mini riot throwing chairs. The police had to shut down the convention because they couldn't guarantee safety. The Democrat Party buildings in Nevada are now shut down because of threats. The personal information of Democrat party officials have been posted online and they've been receiving death threats. This is Bernie Sanders "democracy." We've witnessed it at the Trump rallies and now we witness it turned on the Democrat Party. I wonder what narrative the media will paint. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Loved that NY Times hit piece on the women in Trumps life. We learned that he was basically the only person to put women in charge of Manhattan building projects in the 1980s. We learned that the NY Times misled Trump's ex-girlfriend about the nature of the story and took her quotes all out of context. She's all over tv today. We learned that Trump expected beauty pageant contestants to actually do their job and stay in shape. "Oh, the humanity!!! What an asshole!" The Republican Party chairman is saying that Clinton people put some of these beauty pageant contestants in touch with the NY Times. It just shows how out of touch they are. He expected these women to do their jobs and nothing else. Their job was to look hot. Nobody cares that he inspected their beauty or insisted that they stay in shape. The business depended on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banana Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 You mean that Sanders caucus bullies weren't able to change the result of the first poll? The Sanders people responded by causing a mini riot throwing chairs. The police had to shut down the convention because they couldn't guarantee safety. I've absolutely no love for these crybullies either. Still, Sanders was never going to nor will he get the nomination, bar a miracle beyond Clinton's / establishment control. Loved that NY Times hit piece on the women in Trumps life. Pathetic and transparent hit piece, shit's only going to get dirtier. Also still waiting for anyone here to back up this incessant 'everyone knows!' claim that Trump is a misogynist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Bairn Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 donald.JPG I really want Trump to win this just for the unparalleled seethe and meltdowns all over the internet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 I really want Trump to win this just for the unparalleled seethe and meltdowns all over the internet It's more the actual nuclear meltdowns all over the planet I'd be concerned about. The only saving grace is that they guy has such a massive ego that'd he overstep his authority by some measure, doing something criminally stupid and getting himself impeached and punted a'la Tricky Dicky in the process. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 It's more the actual nuclear meltdowns all over the planet I'd be concerned about. The only saving grace is that they guy has such a massive ego that'd he overstep his authority by some measure, doing something criminally stupid and getting himself impeached and punted a'la Tricky Dicky in the process. I think Dicky jumped before he was pushed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paco Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 I think Dicky jumped before he was pushed. No shit? Trump wouldn't be as big a disaster as people think. Realistically what would he actually manage to do? He needs support of the House and Senate which he's never going to get when it comes to banning Muslims or building the wall. It would cause internal tensions to rise in the population but let's not pretend racism isn't hugely prevalent in the USA anyway. Maybe the public reaction to the racists would help defeat the thing once and for all. Clinton means the status quo which isn't good news either. What a mess that country is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
banana Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 It's more the actual nuclear meltdowns all over the planet I'd be concerned about. What makes you think a Trump presidency is going to produce "nuclear meltdowns all over the planet"? Honestly, where is this shit coming from? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 I really want Trump to win this just for the unparalleled seethe and meltdowns all over the internet I think you are stupid enough to genuinely mean that. You'd fit in well in the U.S. No shit? Trump wouldn't be as big a disaster as people think. Realistically what would he actually manage to do? He needs support of the House and Senate which he's never going to get when it comes to banning Muslims or building the wall. It would cause internal tensions to rise in the population but let's not pretend racism isn't hugely prevalent in the USA anyway. Maybe the public reaction to the racists would help defeat the thing once and for all. Clinton means the status quo which isn't good news either. What a mess that country is. I agree with both these sentiments. I believe we are faced with two 'evils' and Clinton is the lesser of the two. I also think this primary race has shown just how polarised the U.S. is. Whoever wins the presidency there will be huge unhappiness in the country; it will be interesting to see how it manifests itself. The only positive thing for me is there are large swathes of Democrats who have been willing to support Sanders. I don't think he's without his faults but he's argued on a platform that is more radical that anyone I can recall and has a huge amount of public support, particularly from younger Democrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishop Briggs Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 It's more the actual nuclear meltdowns all over the planet I'd be concerned about. The only saving grace is that they guy has such a massive ego that'd he overstep his authority by some measure, doing something criminally stupid and getting himself impeached and punted a'la Tricky Dicky in the process. If Trump wins, he will have to deal with Congress who will stop his crazy policies. That's the real saving grace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 donald.JPG He's utterly unelectable. Fortunately. And besides, he's an utter cretin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumper Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 No shit? Trump wouldn't be as big a disaster as people think. Realistically what would he actually manage to do? He needs support of the House and Senate which he's never going to get when it comes to banning Muslims or building the wall. Uh, what? You could get House Republicans to pass a bill repealing emancipation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yank Mike Posted May 17, 2016 Share Posted May 17, 2016 No shit? Trump wouldn't be as big a disaster as people think. Realistically what would he actually manage to do? He needs support of the House and Senate which he's never going to get when it comes to banning Muslims or building the wall. What's this Congress thing? We live in Obama's America when it comes to immigration policy. In all seriousness, I believe that the President has the legal authority to block anybody he wants from entering the country on national security grounds. He couldn't build the wall without Congressional approval, but he could order the military to the southern border in his role as commander in chief of the armed forces. The only way the Congress could stop that action is to cut off funding to the military completely. Legally the President has to obtain approval from Congress before attacking another country or within 60 days if America or Americans are under threat (again, lol at the law in Obama's America). The President also can't use the federal army within the US against Americans. The President is allowed to use the State National Guards in domestic law enforcement actions if the police can't handle the situation. It's the same as when Eisenhower used the Guard to integrate Southern schools. Immigration law is not currently being enforced by the proper agencies. You just order the Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, and California National Guards to the border and fortify it militarily until Congress agrees to build the wall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.