AUFC90 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 You are the only person trying to turn this into a race debate. If anything religion is more important. Although we had boots on the ground in Ireland so your point, not that you ever had one, is rendered invalid No its not. Our government would never risk innocent whites appearing on the tele with their body parts all over the street. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 No its not. Our government would never risk innocent whites appearing on the tele with their body parts all over the street. If need be the government would kill you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 No its not. Our government would never risk innocent whites appearing on the tele with their body parts all over the street. What colour were the people of the former Yugoslavia ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedRob72 Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 It seems to be only when the military's involved where we have to do 'something' regardless of the potential outcome and facts. Bombing a few hillsides isn't going to make us safer. Actually trying to prevent social discontent and including young Muslim men in society might make a difference but that flies in the face of the Conservatives programme of being arseholes to just about everyone. Social discontent! So that's the reason eh!? You think these nutters crave social harmony? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Couple of interesting bits of bad news being sneaked out today (coincidence of course). There's Gove scrapping Graylings court charges shambles and interestingly the National Audit office's report on the utter disgrace that is the e-borders integrated "are you a terrorist" IT system for the UK Border force. Call me mad, but since we have a very large and very cold moat surrounding our country would it not be easier to protect against terror using an effective border control force rather than bombing an oil field?UK spending watchdog criticises failure over e-borders programme 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Who does the other girl support Fidey and is she a Yes or No voter? Jeezo Not sure, Bobby. The other girl isn't as gobby as the other two so hard to tell where her feelings are on the matter. The two Rangers supporting girls are pies of the highest order though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forever_blue Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 It seems to be only when the military's involved where we have to do 'something' regardless of the potential outcome and facts. Bombing a few hillsides isn't going to make us safer. Actually trying to prevent social discontent and including young Muslim men in society might make a difference but that flies in the face of the Conservatives programme of being arseholes to just about everyone. the government are not going out their way to exclude young Muslim men from anything 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I was afraid I'd crawl out of bed hearing of air strikes. Okay. So, those of you who support it, do you actually think this will end anything? Are you so fucking thick that you can't see this would at best be a band aid, and at worst multiply things? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Why didn't we carpet bomb Belfast when the IRA were actually SUCCEEDING in attacking brits on British soil ? Oh that's right, the citizens of Belfast are the correct colour. Had there been a YES victory at the referendum who knows how the No camp would have reacted. Doubt they would have rolled over. Maybe a few Uber Unionists on here might have turned to terrorism. Would the British Establishment have supported them? Would most us being white mattered? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 If need be the government would kill you. Dr David Kelly? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Illuminati Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 If you voted no don't fucking complain or be upset about the actions of the government you wanted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I was afraid I'd crawl out of bed hearing of air strikes. Okay. So, those of you who support it, do you actually think this will end anything? Are you so fucking thick that you can't see this would at best be a band aid, and at worst multiply things? Sadly, those who support it ARE that thick. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Illuminati, on 03 Dec 2015 - 13:05, said:If you voted no don't fucking complain or be upset about the actions of the government you wanted. Oh f**k off. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Worth noting that anyone who harks back to the referendum on this is as big a c**t as anyone who supports it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fide Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Worth noting that anyone who harks back to the referendum on this is as big a c**t as anyone who supports it. I'd beg to differ on that one. I think someone who supports the strikes is a *little* worse, imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Worth noting that anyone who harks back to the referendum on this is as big a c**t as anyone who supports it. You speak bollocks. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ira Gaines Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 I don't. If you're so bitter that you hark back to it on every bad decision, then you're an absolutely massive c**t. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScotSquid Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 On the airstrikes.. It's a lot more complicated than being for or against them in total. I have no problem with this oil field being bombed. I'd have voted for that. Its a wider campaign that risks civilian lives too much I don't like. For those vehemently against the decision, is that also true for attacks against for example the oil field? I don't see a downside to that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glenconner Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 Dr David Kelly? Dr Michael Kelly? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 3, 2015 Share Posted December 3, 2015 On the airstrikes.. It's a lot more complicated than being for or against them in total. I have no problem with this oil field being bombed. I'd have voted for that. Its a wider campaign that risks civilian lives too much I don't like. For those vehemently against the decision, is that also true for attacks against for example the oil field? I don't see a downside to that. Not too sure there is a downside. Just a little bit surprising that the combined might and intelligence of the US, France and the others managed to have missed it. Doubt it's been hiding in a cave up until now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.