Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 That stupid question sums up the entire The Blue Scum FC 2012 Fanbase. Even the St Mirren fans must cringe at your patter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 You're jobless and mentally ill, if that wasn't bad enough you support St Mirren. How much can one man be afflicted with?That's 3 times now. Anyway why do you wave Union Flags and sing about the Queen and Rule Britannia when your Club and Fans are a disgrace to Britain and bring great shame to our Country and Football. Decent British people abhor the lot of you. But you'll guard Londonderry's Walls. Ha ha ha ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 That's 3 times now. Anyway why do you wave Union Flags and sing about the Queen and Rule Britannia when your Club and Fans are a disgrace to Britain and bring great shame to our Country and Football. Decent British people abhor the lot of you. But you'll guard Londonderry's Walls. Ha ha ha ha ha You are mentally ill. Seek help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Even the St Mirren fans must cringe at your patter.All St Mirren fans are decent football supporters. Not mouthbreathing knuckledragging bigots like the The Newcunto FC 2012 fannybase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 You are mentally ill. Seek help.Four times Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 All St Mirren fans are decent football supporters. Not mouthbreathing knuckledragging bigots like the The Newcunto FC 2012 fannybase. You have your good and bad in all supports, you are bad, but I can understand why you are that way. Prescription medicine will help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 You have your good and bad in all supports, you are bad, but I can understand why you are that way. Prescription medicine will help.5 times. You help me because you are one of the Peepil What does that mean, Wiggly? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Read his ruling. So that's a big fat no then? Thanks for clearing that up wee man. Knew you were just a lying supporter of dead scumbag cheats. But nice of you to confirm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 So that's a big fat no then? Thanks for clearing that up wee man. Knew you were just a lying supporter of dead scumbag cheats. But nice of you to confirm. http://stv.tv/sport/football/215802-key-points-from-lord-nimmo-smiths-ruling-on-rangers/ Ask for help if you can't understand any of the big words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Another rangers fan who provides a news story as evidence, instead of the actual item. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Another rangers fan who provides a news story as evidence, instead of the actual item. If STV news is too much for your brain to cope with then you are in trouble. You have been spoon fed enough, the facts are there for you to see and it is up to you whether you accept them or continue to deny reality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Stv are obviously part of the dreaded SMSM dear readers and as such we have to discredit them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 That STV link is actually a very good source. It illustrates that Rangers kept their trophies on a mere technicality, whereby retrospective withdrawal of eligibility is problematic. There is absolutely no suggestion that retaining the titles is moral or correct. As a fan, I genuinely cannot imagine what would possess other ones to take pride in things 'won' in such circumstances. It's actually stunning that anyone would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 That STV link is actually a very good source. It illustrates that Rangers kept their trophies on a mere technicality, whereby retrospective withdrawal of eligibility is problematic. There is absolutely no suggestion that retaining the titles is moral or correct. As a fan, I genuinely cannot imagine what would possess other ones to take pride in things 'won' in such circumstances. It's actually stunning that anyone would. What 'stuns' you matters not a jot. The titles were won fairly and no rewriting of history by those with perverse agendas and with more hatred for Rangers than love for their own club matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 I loved your dead Club more than you Wiggly Waggly . They gave me many hours of laughter. You and your bigot fans stood by a Wall while your verminous Club died. What a fucking hoot that was. The cry wis naw... Blue Fannies Ha ha ha ha ha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Your old team broke a rule (which you admit) and gained financial advantage (which only a liar would deny) because of it - this is pretty much the definition of cheating. Oh the bombastic and idiotic diddies! I thought the usual (brain-dead) claim was that we gained a sporting advantage. As if this wasn't stupid enough we've now gained 'a financial advantage'. Hands up any football fan who would like their club to obtain a 'sporting advantage' and/or a 'financial advantage'? So that's every hand on the thread up, then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 That STV link is actually a very good source. It illustrates that Rangers kept their trophies on a mere technicality, whereby retrospective withdrawal of eligibility is problematic. There is absolutely no suggestion that retaining the titles is moral or correct. As a fan, I genuinely cannot imagine what would possess other ones to take pride in things 'won' in such circumstances. It's actually stunning that anyone would. If it's the one I think it is, it shows that the fat low level paper gatherer never understood the rules correctly and misled the SPL regarding title stripping. Doesn't it also state that the payments did not breach SFA/SPL rules and that the players were registered correctly..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 If it's the one I think it is, it shows that the fat low level paper gatherer never understood the rules correctly and misled the SPL regarding title stripping. Doesn't it also state that the payments did not breach SFA/SPL rules and that the players were registered correctly..... Indeed. Proper payments and properly registered players. Don't you remember The QC having at least a three month campaign about player registration? Dummies thrown out the pram and toys spat. Oh to have a proper plastic rather than these plastic plastics! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Where the f**k is Tedi when you need him???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Doesn't it also state that the payments did not breach SFA/SPL rules and that the players were registered correctly..... It very specifically says that rules were breached. What do you think the fine was for? The players were however not deemed ineligible, because they could not apparently be rendered so retrospectively. Do you really hate reading stuff for yourself, that much Bennett? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.