Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Went a bit off topic it seems. Can I bring it back? Seems Mark is saying today he's just about got three signing targets over the line for next season...one of which is surely Rossiter of Liverpool. Perhaps McParland deserves credit for that..... Looks to be a good player. Liverpool fans certainly seem perplexed he's moving. He is the type of player we should be after, young and hungry ex-academy players who can't get a game because Liverpool etc got in another foreign import. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 If there was no sporting advantage as the case decided then they were won fairly. A bottom feeder 'supporter' of Queen of the South doesn't alter history. The 'no sporting advantage' part has been widely ridiculed and indeed challenged in subsequent rulings on the big tax case. Even then, LNS was only saying that the registration deceit did not in itself confer such an advantage. What it clearly did do though was attempt to conceal a method of paying players, that was designed to do just that. What's with the "bottom feeder" stuff anyway? Why so quick to leap to infantile insult, when all I'm doing is discussing the issues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 Liverpool fans certainly seem perplexed he's moving. He is the type of player we should be after, young and hungry ex-academy players who can't get a game because Liverpool etc got in another foreign import. Agreed. From reading their forums he's a two-footed defensive midfielder who reads the game well and breaks up opposition attacks whilst initiating his own. Exactly what we need. From what I've seen, it's 50/50 from Pool fans on losing him but when you factor in the old "he's leaving us, he's crap" factor that all football supporters do then it seems this guy is really regarded as a loss. Good bit of business......again.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 The 'no sporting advantage' part has been widely ridiculed and indeed challenged in subsequent rulings on the big tax case. Even then, LNS was only saying that the registration deceit did not in itself confer such an advantage. What it clearly did do though was attempt to conceal a method of paying players, that was designed to do just that. What's with the "bottom feeder" stuff anyway? Why so quick to leap to infantile insult, when all I'm doing is discussing the issues? Can I ask Monkey, as you have been so passionate. How are you so emotionally affected by what happens to Rangers? I find it strange. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 Lols Indeed. Good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 The 'no sporting advantage' part has been widely ridiculed and indeed challenged in subsequent rulings on the big tax case. Even then, LNS was only saying that the registration deceit did not in itself confer such an advantage. What it clearly did do though was attempt to conceal a method of paying players, that was designed to do just that. What's with the "bottom feeder" stuff anyway? Why so quick to leap to infantile insult, when all I'm doing is discussing the issues? Widely ridiculed by who? A nobody like you? Do you think your weasel words carry the same weight as LNS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 It's got Benny bye for ages. I'm sorry. I've no idea what that means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 The 'no sporting advantage' part has been widely ridiculed But only by the brain-dead. A duty of any team is to gain a sporting advantage. This is absolutely why they exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 Surely not by fraudulent means though ? Disagree with my statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 Have another wine. hic ! Seems that your only reply to me. If you have a point, make it. Else, you're just a sad troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 I just did... You didn't. I said, simply, that, "A duty of any team is to gain a sporting advantage. This is absolutely why they exist." Now what flaw is their in what I've just said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waggy's Grin Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 There are rules and regulations for a reason. Thanks, Buzz Killington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solitaire Posted May 9, 2016 Author Share Posted May 9, 2016 Thanks, Buzz Killington. The guy has nothing. He's not even funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 No No, genuine, birth was sudden, 4 weeks early, thankfully all went well. All of which has nothing to do with Warburton...unless you are going to tell us he is the father that you are referring to. Congratulations BTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 You didn't. I said, simply, that, "A duty of any team is to gain a sporting advantage. This is absolutely why they exist." Now what flaw is their in what I've just said? There are rules and regulations for a reason. Right you are. So nothing you can think of. No surprise. Stick to, "You make me sick.". The Diddies are always on firmer ground when they show aggression rather than pretending they can talk sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 9, 2016 Share Posted May 9, 2016 First team in history to be liquidated, reformed, fined, voted on to enter league system That can't be possibly true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 You're right, I made up some shite to make it sound better. I liked the 'reformed' bit, though. Sadly you put it in the wrong place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Nederlander Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 But only by the brain-dead. A duty of any team is to gain a sporting advantage. This is absolutely why they exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 I'd hoped you'd say something interesting but it's the same derivative shite. You really are a damp squid. A damp squid? Trolling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BinoBalls Posted May 10, 2016 Share Posted May 10, 2016 You didn't. I said, simply, that, "A duty of any team is to gain a sporting advantage. This is absolutely why they exist." Now what flaw is their in what I've just said? I guess we can give Ben Johnson back his 1988 100m gold winners medal then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.