Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, Loondave1 said: 6 minutes ago, Peppino Impastato said: The UK champ. And in international law freedom fighters are 100% okay. Only the colonists view them as terrorists. Their behaviour was much better than the UK's and loyalists btw. Is that some sort of "Pep's Law"...or official and I'm really disappointed with the "champ" reference I thought we had turned a corner there. "100% okay" is that an actual quote from said "international law" ? I smell shi.. Yes that's from international law champ. The Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation for example are breaking no laws. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lichtgilphead Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 13 minutes ago, Loondave1 said: Were there any republican "baddies" or was being republican a sort of "free pass" for any behaviour whatsoever ? Just wondering.. Obviously these dammned American republicans were baddies. They rebelled against their lawful King, George III, placed by God himself above them. Evil splitters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Yes that's from international law champ. The Palestinians resisting Israeli occupation for example are breaking no laws.Blowing up pubs was fair game? I’m off to those shiteholes in Royal Exchange Square, then. I’ll claim I’m fighting oppression from the Gammons. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 2 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: Blowing up pubs was fair game? I’m off to those shiteholes in Royal Exchange Square, then. I’ll claim I’m fighting oppression from the Gammons. Did I say that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Shooting a British soldier in the head in Belfast in 1980 was completely legal, justifiable in international law and 100% legitimate. Bombing a pub in English not the same thing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Did I say that?Yes? If you didn’t you’ll need to tighten up on your delivery, because that’s 100% what it reads like. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 3 minutes ago, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: Yes? If you didn’t you’ll need to tighten up on your delivery, because that’s 100% what it reads like. Maybe you should tighten up in your comprehension. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 The UK champ. And in international law freedom fighters are 100% okay. Only the colonists view them as terrorists. Their behaviour was much better than the UK's and loyalists btw.So the guys that bombed the pubs weren’t “freedom fighters”? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Just now, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: So the guys that bombed the pubs weren’t “freedom fighters”? Arguably yes, but that's a criminal act. Targeting the agents of oppression is totally fine, a pub is not one of them. Though the gfa exonerated them btw. Only in the UK the home of colonialism would people even question this stuff, these are very basic long established tenets of international law, resisting illegal occupation is 100% fine and actually protected in the un charter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HTG Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Pep - gonna wrap up so we can get back to calling out the Gammon wankers. Ffs - dug meet bone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 1 hour ago, Peppino Impastato said: Aye cause we'd colonised it in order to try to steal it. You need to go further back champ, our colonialism started long before that. I was under the impression that Northern Ireland was colonized to create a wedge between the Gaelic speakers of the North (i.e. what is now the Highlands of Scotland) and the Gaelic speakers of the South (i.e. what is now the Republic of Ireland). Typically these settlers were Protestants from the Scottish lowlands for whom the countryside of Northern Ireland looked similar to where they were from. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Arguably yes, but that's a criminal act. Targeting the agents of oppression is totally fine, a pub is not one of them. Though the gfa exonerated them btw. Only in the UK the home of colonialism would people even question this stuff, these are very basic long established tenets of international law, resisting illegal occupation is 100% fine and actually protected in the un charter.So the act defines whether they are freedom fighters or not? You intimated they were all 100% fine to do what they did, but now you’ve changed the goalposts.As me and Archie Bell have already said, tighten up, champ. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 I'm actually looking forward to some gammon civil unrest. Street protests will be an excellent recreation of Village of the Damned, long overdue a remake imo. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Just now, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: So the act defines whether they are freedom fighters or not? You intimated they were all 100% fine to do what they did, but now you’ve changed the goalposts. As me and Archie Bell have already said, tighten up, champ. No I didn't. I said resisting occupation in your own country is legal. Bombing a pub in another country is not doing that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 No I didn't. I said resisting occupation in your own country is legal. Bombing a pub in another country is not doing that.No you didn’t. You said freedom fighters are 100% legitimised under international law. Anyway, who cares? No point in arguing semantics. I was merely trying to make a joke about my hatred for The Social or whatever it is called these days. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 6 minutes ago, Fullerene said: I was under the impression that Northern Ireland was colonized to create a wedge between the Gaelic speakers of the North (i.e. what is now the Highlands of Scotland) and the Gaelic speakers of the South (i.e. what is now the Republic of Ireland). Typically these settlers were Protestants from the Scottish lowlands for whom the countryside of Northern Ireland looked similar to where they were from. Partly, also England had been attacked from Ulster several times by France too https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plantation_of_Ulster 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 Just now, Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo said: No you didn’t. You said freedom fighters are 100% legitimised under international law. Anyway, who cares? No point in arguing semantics. I was merely trying to make a joke about my hatred for The Social or whatever it is called these days. They are. People bombing pubs in England are not freedom fighters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 I'm actually looking forward to some gammon civil unrest. Street protests will be an excellent recreation of Village of the Damned, long overdue a remake imo. Charles and Di’s wedding street party meets an Eddy Hearn boxing night. Sounds fantastic. Cocaine, heart attacks and plastic chairs everywhere. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 (edited) 26 minutes ago, Peppino Impastato said: No I didn't. I said resisting occupation in your own country is legal. Bombing a pub in another country is not doing that. What if the majority in your own country don't consider it occupation, and would rather everything stayed the same? If you disagree you have the right to shoot policemen and soldiers trying uphold the way it is because of "but 400 years ago likes"? Edited July 31, 2018 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppino Impastato Posted July 31, 2018 Share Posted July 31, 2018 7 minutes ago, welshbairn said: What if the majority in your own country don't consider it occupation, and would rather everything stayed the same? If you disagree you have the right to shoot policemen and soldiers trying uphold the way it is because of "but 400 years ago likes"? International law decides that. By the same token you can't illegally invade, occupy and colonise somewhere then when people make an issue of it say but we've been here for ages. That doesn't make the colonialism legal or legitimate. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.