The Official Former President Trump thread

[banana]

3 hours ago, dorlomin said:

Haidt is pretty clear that social justice is a very good thing. He is also clear that this is about liberalism of both the left and the right vs a small but vocal group of activists, he is very clear things like woman's rights have been beneficial to society but his contentious issue is that a over molly coddled generation is turning to institutional authority to enforce their own values and this reducing the diversity of opinion on campus.

Worth listening to this minute or so bearing in mind this is a thread about Trump. Haidt places him and the Alt Right in their place.

 

I refer you to the comments you made moments ago, which I agree with.

3 hours ago, dorlomin said:

I like Haidt, he has provocative things to say. I dont agree with them all but its a good kind of stirring.

A good amount of his position and the video I linked to are making a quite accurate sense of what's going on, but I have a fair amount to quibble with too, such as Social Justice (caps) being in your summary of his words 'a very good thing'.

You may be underestimating the reach and impact of 'small' vocal group of activists. This infestation of authoritarian 'Progressive' bullshit goes way beyond university campuses, and it absolutely is not only turning to the authority of institutions, it's becoming that authority.

[banana]

8 hours ago, NotThePars said:

The first person I saw write about post truth was Jim Murphy. Is this how far right posters are that Jim Murphy's a progressive?

Reality definitely revolves around when you personally first saw something

One of your bizarrest ever posts, which is saying something. Have a greenie.

[banana]

7 hours ago, pandarilla said:

Right wing conservatives blatantly opposed civil rights in the 50s and 60s. It's a bit rich to turn round and criticise king for not being a feminist.

Perhaps he was aware of Feminism's racist history (you are aware of this, being even a coffee shop feminist, right?).

If he were alive today, he'd certainly be horrified with the systemised racism of modern (intersectional) Feminism.

[welshbairn]

39 minutes ago, banana said:

modern (intersectional) Feminism

Scribbling on pad..

[banana]

Scribbling on pad..

Drunk again?

[welshbairn]

Compiling a modern dictionary is not a 9-5 job. Hopefully you'll help me out with the definitions?

[welshbairn]

Bullet points from Trump's interview with Michael Gove:

Brexit: It was a "smart" decision by the UK
UK-US trade deals: "We're gonna get something done very quickly"
Angela Merkel: She made a "catastrophic mistake" by letting in 1m migrants
The EU: "It's basically a vehicle for Germany" and other countries will also leave because of anger over immigration
Nato: It's "obsolete" but "very important to me" and other members should pay "their fair share"
Iran nuclear deal: It's "one of the dumbest deals I have ever seen"
Iraq war: It was "like throwing rocks into a beehive"
Twitter: "I'll keep it [as president] - I can go bing, bing bing" and respond to "dishonest" news

[banana]

1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

Compiling a modern dictionary is not a 9-5 job. Hopefully you'll help me out with the definitions?

Oppression Top Trumps, basically.

Whereas previous waves of feminism were almost entirely focussed on gender issues facing women (a single axis of measurement of how oppressed someone is), this started morphing into Intersectional Feminism in the 2nd wave and has all but taken over modern 3rd wave, introducing more and more additional axes (race, religion, ethnicity, sexuality, trans, disability, ...) to measure how 'oppressed' someone is.

As a tool for understanding the world, it's a fairly useful for making broad statements/observations. However, in actuality it's wielded as a weapon against alleged oppressors (those axes with the most perceived 'privilege'), to claim permanent inherent victimhood regardless of your choices, and to advocate for special treatment and rights based on this. It's where the current trend of open castigation of straight white men comes from (Straight being the most 'privileged' on the Sexuality axis, White being the most 'privileged' on the Race axis, Men being the most 'privileged' on the Gender axis).

Basically, an utterly vile, divisive ideology of systemised bigotry.

Edited January 16, 2017 by banana
fucking app formatting

[welshbairn]

In the mean time. straight white men still run the World, so it's them you should be complaining to.

[banana]

10 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

In the mean time. straight white men still run the World, so it's them you should be complaining to.

That would be extremely bigoted not to mention fallacious, kiddo. Hence, my preference for Trump over Reptillary to hopefully stem the tide.

Edited January 16, 2017 by banana

[Deplorable]

5 hours ago, DrewDon said:

Fair play to Mikey Gove for landing the first UK post-election Trump interview: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/donald-trump-interview-brexit-britain-trade-deal-europe-queen-5m0bc2tns (£). I don't feel like I am exaggerating when I say that some of Trump's responses genuinely read like they have come from the moaning man down the pub who has had one too many. Incoherent, intellectually featherweight and his speaking style is really quite strange. Full interview in spoiler. 

  Reveal hidden contents

During the race for the Republican presidential nomination, Donald Trump had an insult for every rival. Marco Rubio was “little Marco” and Jeb Bush was “low energy Jeb”. These jibes were more than just debating techniques to unsettle his opponents. They were carefully designed to draw a contrast between The Donald and The Others. Because when you meet him you realise there is nothing, absolutely nothing, small-scale or low-wattage about America’s president-elect.

Donald J Trump appears like a man who has been plugged into some power source where the dial has been turned up to levels well beyond what the safety regulations would recommend. His skin glows a sodium orange, his hair is blonder than any human you will have encountered and his clothes are in primary colours so bold they make everyone else in the room seem dowdy.

Ever since a Virginia farmer called George Washington launched his bid for glory, the British have had a tendency to underestimate American presidents. Especially Republicans. When Abraham Lincoln was in the White House, our government sympathised with the Confederacy. When Ronald Reagan was commander-in-chief, the British foreign policy establishment derided him as a trigger-happy cowboy who was in danger of pitching us into a third world war.

But no Republican, indeed no president, has come to office facing anything like the level of scorn and condescension from British politicians and commentators as Mr Trump. When we talked last Friday, however, he had nothing but kind words and generous sentiments for a nation he believes will be his strongest ally.

I was invited to see the president-elect, along with my colleague Kai Diekmann, from the German newspaper Bild, because Mr Trump wanted to chat about Britain, Brexit, Europe and the world. The Trump team knew that Kai was close to German chancellors, from Kohl to Merkel, and was aware of my role as a campaigner for Brexit. We chatted, on and off the record, for an hour in his corner office in Trump Tower, surrounded by mementoes of his past successes, commercial and political.

British politicians tend to hide photographs, cartoons and front pages that chronicle their careers in the loo to appear self-deprecating. With Mr Trump, everything is on display in his glitzy, golden man cave, from admiring profiles in magazines to Christmas cards from world leaders.

And, ultra-competitive as he is, the president-elect was particularly keen to remind me that, almost alone among international figures, he had had the natural good judgment to foresee our departure from the EU.

“I sort of, as you know, predicted it. I was in Turnberry [his Scottish golf course] and was doing a ribbon cutting because I bought Turnberry, which is doing unbelievably, and I’ll tell you, the fact that your pound sterling has gone down? Great. Because business is unbelievable in a lot of parts in the UK, as you know. I think Brexit is going to end up being a great thing.”

And would he, as our government hoped, move quickly to seal a new trade deal with the UK? “Absolutely, very quickly. I’m a big fan of the UK, we’re gonna work very hard to get it done quickly and done properly. Good for both sides. I will be meeting with [Theresa May] — in fact if you want you can see the letter, wherever the letter is, she just sent it. She’s requesting a meeting and we’ll have a meeting right after I get into the White House and . . . we’re gonna get something done very quickly.”

The president-elect is much less sanguine about the future of the EU itself. A combination of economic woes and the migrant crisis will, he believes, lead to other countries leaving. “People, countries, want their own identity and the UK wanted its own identity. But, I do believe this, if they hadn’t been forced to take in all of the refugees, so many, with all the problems that it . . . entails, I think that you wouldn’t have a Brexit. This was the final straw that broke the camel’s back. . . I believe others will leave. I do think keeping it together is not gonna be as easy as a lot of people think. And I think this, if refugees keep pouring into different parts of Europe . . . I think it’s gonna be very hard to keep it together because people are angry about it.”

While he expresses admiration for Angela Merkel, Mr Trump believes that she made “one catastrophic mistake” by welcoming an unlimited number of Syrian refugees. More than one million migrants from north Africa and the Middle East arrived between 2015 and 2016. He adds that he believes the West should have built safe zones in Syria — paid for by the Gulf — to limit the surge. “I think she made one very catastrophic mistake and that was taking all of these illegals, you know taking all of the people from wherever they come from. And nobody even knows where they come from.”

There is no rancour or glee in his prediction of the break-up of the EU, quite the opposite. His demeanour is warm and genial, the flame-throwing rhetoric of his rallies and press conferences replaced with showers of compliments. He describes Jean-Claude Juncker as a very fine gentleman, and says that he has great respect for Mrs Merkel.

His pessimism about the EU is rooted in his view of it as anti-jobs and anti-growth. And it springs, as so much of his world view does, from his experience as a businessman rather than any ideological preconception.

“I own a big property in Ireland, magnificent property called Doonbeg. What happened is I went for an approval to do this massive, beautiful expansion — that was when I was a developer, now I couldn’t care less about it . . . but I learnt a lot because . . . they were using environmental tricks to stop a project from being built. I found it to be a very unpleasant experience. To get the approvals from the EU would have taken years. I don’t think that’s good for a country like Ireland. So you know what I did? I said forget it, I’m not gonna build it.”

Mr Trump’s view is that Europe is dominated by Germany, and Britain was wise to extract itself: “You look at the European Union and it’s Germany. Basically a vehicle for Germany. That’s why I thought the UK was so smart in getting out.”

Mr Trump’s hostility to the EU has been matched by his scepticism towards another pillar of the postwar order, Nato. But the president-elect was at pains to emphasise that he is committed to the defence of Europe and the West. His concerns are, principally, that Nato had not reformed to meet the main threat that we face — Islamist terrorism — and its members had relied too heavily on America. “I said a long time ago that Nato had problems. Number one it was obsolete, because it was designed many, many years ago. Number two the countries aren’t paying what they’re supposed to pay. I took such heat, when I said Nato was obsolete. It’s obsolete because it wasn’t taking care of terror. I took a lot of heat for two days. And then they started saying Trump is right.

“And the other thing is the countries aren’t paying their fair share so we’re supposed to protect countries. But a lot of these countries aren’t paying what they’re supposed to be paying, which I think is very unfair to the United States. With that being said, Nato is very important to me. There’s five countries that are paying what they’re supposed to. Five. It’s not much.”

Strengthening US defences was at the forefront of Mr Trump’s mind during our conversation and he went into significant detail off the record about weapons programmes, procurement and Pentagon reform.

He’s no Kissinger and you’d no more expect him to discuss Clausewitz and Kennan than set fire to his own hair. But intelligence takes many forms. And Mr Trump’s number-rich analysis of defence spending reflects a businessman’s ability to cut through jargon to get to the essentials of a case.

The same Trump who uses gladiatorial press conferences and CAPITALISED tweets to hurl huge crude blocks of rhetoric at opponents is also the master of the P&L accounts and the determined negotiator who sees government as a failing corporation ripe for re-engineering.

Mario Cuomo, former governor of New York, once said that American politicians campaign in poetry and govern in prose. Mr Trump campaigned in 140-character Twitter storms and intends to govern by spreadsheet. So when I ask about, for example, Iran he makes it clear that his approach is that of a man who doesn’t want to see his country suckered again.

“Well I don’t want to say what I’m gonna do with the Iran deal. I just don’t want to play the cards. I mean, look, I’m not a politician, I don’t go out and say, “I’m gonna do this” — I’m gonna do, I gotta do what I gotta do . . . But I’m not happy with the Iran deal, I think it’s one of the worst deals ever made, I think it’s one of the dumbest deals I’ve ever seen . . . Where you give . . . $150 billion back to a country, where you give 1.7 billion in cash. Did you ever see $100 million in hundred-dollar bills? It’s a lot. 1.7 billion in cash. Plane loads. Many planes. Boom. 1.7 billion. I don’t understand. I think that money is in Swiss bank accounts.”

It is not just foreign leaders at whom he vents spleen. The invasion of Iraq, he argues, was “one of the worst decisions, possibly the worst decision, ever made in the history of our country. It’s like throwing rocks into a beehive.”

Mr Trump’s transactional approach to politics means he wants to avoid taking up fixed positions towards other leaders too soon. He intends to give them the benefit of the doubt initially. And he hopes such an approach can lead to de-escalating international tensions. Specifically, he floated the idea of reviewing sanctions on Russia if President Putin is prepared to move away from confrontation. “They have sanctions on Russia — let’s see if we can make some good deals with Russia. For one thing, I think nuclear weapons should be way down and reduced very substantially, that’s part of it. But Russia’s hurting very badly right now because of sanctions, but I think something can happen that a lot of people are gonna benefit.”

Despite a strong desire to improve relations with Russia, Mr Trump was unequivocal in his condemnation of its role in Syria. He was also implicitly critical of President Obama for failing to restrain President Assad and Mr Putin. “It’s a very bad thing, we had a chance to do something when we had the line in the sand and . . . nothing happened. That was the only time. And now, it’s sort of very late. It’s too late . . . But Aleppo was nasty. I mean when you see them shooting old ladies walking out of town — they can’t even walk and they’re shooting ’em — it almost looks like they’re shooting ’em for sport — ah no, that’s . . . a terrible situation.”

Talking of Russia inevitably brings us to the allegations that the Kremlin has compromising material garnered during a Trump visit to Moscow for the Miss Universe contest. The president-elect is, unsurprisingly, dismissive of the allegations but he did express disquiet at the involvement of a former MI6 officer.

“That guy is somebody that you should look at, because whatever he made up about me it was false. He was supposedly hired by the Republicans and Democrats working together. Even that I don’t believe because they don’t work together, they work separately and they don’t hire the same guy. What, they got together?

“When I just heard it I ripped up the mat . . . If I did that in a hotel it’d be the biggest thing. They’d have me on the front page of the New York Post, right? And the other thing, I can’t even, I don’t even want to shake hands with people now I hear about this stuff.”

Despite all of Mr Trump’s expressions of admiration for Mr Putin and Mrs Merkel, he revealed that he was prepared to cut ties with both: “Well, I start off trusting both — but let’s see how long that lasts. It may not last long at all.”

Mr Trump’s conversation flows like a river in spate, overwhelming interruptions and objections, reflecting the force of nature that is the man. But it would be a mistake to think that he is all instinct and impulse. He wants to bring to governing the same calculating business style that he has brought to communicating. While he has been criticised for tweeting attacks on everyone from Meryl Streep to the civil rights hero John Lewis, he has no intention of abandoning Twitter because he believes it gives him a direct connection to the American people.

“@realDonaldTrump I think, I’ll keep it . . . so I’ve got 46 million people right now — that’s a lot, that’s really a lot — but 46 million — including Facebook, Twitter and ya know, Instagram, so when you think that you’re 46 million there, I’d rather just let that build up and just keep it @realDonaldTrump, it’s working — and the tweeting, I thought I’d do less of it, but I’m covered so dishonestly by the press — so dishonestly — that I can put out Twitter — and it’s not 140, it’s now 280 — I can go bing bing bing . . . and they put it on and as soon as I tweet it out — this morning on television, Fox — ‘Donald Trump, we have breaking news’.”

Breaking news is one thing we certainly won’t be short of with President Trump in the White House.

"It’s a lot. 1.7 billion in cash. Plane loads. Many planes. Boom. 1.7 billion. I don’t understand."

You are questioning the intellect of Trump while having Justin fuckin Trudeau in your avatar? The dude with a literature and education bachelors degrees. That screams trust fund kid who wanted easy degrees to keep the money coming until he was old enough for full access outside of being a student. Then he dropped out of graduate school for engineering and again for something called environmental geography. The guy who just named a social worker Somali immigrant as Immigration Minister rather than somebody who is looking out for Canadians? The One Direction Prime Minister? Vs the guy with an economics degree from an Ivy League school who then went on to become a billionaire?

[Deplorable]

4 hours ago, banana said:

Perhaps he was aware of Feminism's racist history (you are aware of this, being even a coffee shop feminist, right?).

If he were alive today, he'd certainly be horrified with the systemised racism of modern (intersectional) Feminism.

No. If MLK were alive today he'd follow every wacky white led progressive fantasy, just like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton because that's where the money is. No chance MLK would side with the "woke" black nationalists who consider feminism a white plot to destroy the black man and black culture.

[Cerberus]

Anyway Happy MLK Day.
I hope people have a good day off courtesy of the big man.

[banana]

Anyway Happy MLK Day.
I hope people have a good day off courtesy of the big man.

That sudden change of thread tone [emoji23]

[banana]

7 hours ago, Deplorable said:

You are questioning the intellect of Trump while having Justin fuckin Trudeau in your avatar? The dude with a literature and education bachelors degrees. That screams trust fund kid who wanted easy degrees to keep the money coming until he was old enough for full access outside of being a student. Then he dropped out of graduate school for engineering and again for something called environmental geography. The guy who just named a social worker Somali immigrant as Immigration Minister rather than somebody who is looking out for Canadians? The One Direction Prime Minister? Vs the guy with an economics degree from an Ivy League school who then went on to become a billionaire?

A living, breathing virtue signal in human form.

7 hours ago, Deplorable said:

No. If MLK were alive today he'd follow every wacky white led progressive fantasy, just like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton because that's where the money is. No chance MLK would side with the "woke" black nationalists who consider feminism a white plot to destroy the black man and black culture.

If he were of age doing his thing now, perhaps. If the same guy from the 50s 60s could see what it's become, from what I know of him I doubt it.

Edited January 16, 2017 by banana

[Deplorable]

55 minutes ago, Cerberus said:

Anyway Happy MLK Day.
I hope people have a good day off courtesy of the big man.

Don't forget Robert E. Lee Day for our friends in Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi, and Virginia.

 

[Deplorable]

 

[NotThePars]

Reality definitely revolves around when you personally first saw something
One of your bizarrest ever posts, which is saying something. Have a greenie.

Clearly I was just remembering where I first saw the term and then laughing at how the author of that piece would somehow be termed a "progressive". Do continue inverting the oppression pyramid so you're at the bottom, champ.

[banana]

Clearly I was just remembering where I first saw the term and then laughing at how the author of that piece would somehow be termed a "progressive". Do continue inverting the oppression pyramid so you're at the bottom, champ.

I can't remember ever stating my race, ethnicity, sexuality, or gender identity on P&B, you stereotyping bigot.

Reported for transphobia.

[NotThePars]

Right well I mean nobody who doesn't have reactionary opinions on gender diversity in video games is going to have that sort of patter.