Jump to content

Drug deaths in Scotland hit record high


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Bairnardo said:

What about anyone else who commits a crime? Are you saying there is no rehabilitation from crime?

If that is what you are saying, then you are a moron.

If you are saying that only drug related crimes, perpetrated by people whom you have acknowledged may be in that state, at least partly, becauee of medical issues, are irredeemable, then you....... well..... yoy are a moron.

Hmm

You're making no sense. I think it's because you're a moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

There is a difference between correlation and cause/effect.

Poverty doesn't explain the epidemic levels of cocaine abuse in the middle and upper classes where poverty is absent.

Drug use transcends poverty, mental illness and psychological trauma.

Cocaine and heroin are vastly different in price and are taken for vastly different reasons so that's a bit of a daft comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tibbermoresaint said:

 

That all sounds fine and dandy. What if it isn't safe to do so?

If it's not safe to do so then we obviously don't give them the opportunity.

Just now, oaksoft said:

I would agree with that first sentence in principle but there are caveats.

For example, do repeat criminals deserve equal opportunities with law abiding citizens?

I'll use a driving analogy here - if you lose your licence and want to drive again when your ban is up then you need to resit a more rigorous test to prove that you're deserving of the opportunity to drive again. I'm not saying we sit a recovering junkie in a room with a bag of smack and see if he takes it, but generally repeat offenders should need to prove they are suitable for engaging with society again, in my opinion. Once they've done that, mon in, the waters lovely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, oaksoft said:

OK. In that case I don't know what I would personally do. I'm not convinced I would get involved unless they asked directly for help. That tends to be my default position on any difficulties people I know get themselves into. I don't see it as the place of one human to interfere in the life of another unless that second person is doing harm to others or unless that second person is incapable of genuinely looking after themselves. People with learning difficulties or disabilities or illness would come into that last category. Drug abuse wouldn't IMO. I don't consider addiction as mental illness though so that might explain my thought process.

Tibbermore is behaving like a dick on this issue but I agree that drug taking is a choice and that addiction is also a choice. Those who help other break addiction allude to this when they say you that the addict has to WANT to go clean for rehab to work. In other words, the addict has to choose to go clean. That is not how illnesses work.

I suppose that's where we differ. I would absolutely step in if I saw my kid or my pal burrowing into a drug hole, if they refused that help I still wouldn't give up.

I agree that an addict needs to want to come off it for it work, but if an addict doesn't see themselves with a problem they won't agree to coming off anything. I think there's grounds to say that a drug addict has a mental illness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Moomintroll
Some people get upset when I call others snowflakes. So I won't. Can we just take it as read that you are?
I don't think Conservative voting Brexiteers are allowed to be snowflakes tbh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moomintroll said:
20 minutes ago, Tibbermoresaint said:
Some people get upset when I call others snowflakes. So I won't. Can we just take it as read that you are?

I don't think Conservative voting Brexiteers are allowed to be snowflakes tbh.

You think wrongly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Tibbermore is behaving like a dick on this issue but I agree that drug taking is a choice and that addiction is also a choice. Those who help other break addiction allude to this when they say you that the addict has to WANT to go clean for rehab to work. In other words, the addict has to choose to go clean. That is not how illnesses work.


This is staggeringly ignorant. I agree that choosing to go down the route of taking drugs is a choice. The reasons why folk do it have been done to death on here so there's no point in giving my views on it. But to say addiction is a choice is just completely wrong. Physical addiction is a real thing. The body craves the fix. If the person woke up the next day and decided "right, no more drugs". They couldn't get up and carry on a normal day, the body would need the hit. Just look at withdrawal effects on any health website. Are you seriously suggesting the person chooses to have these symptoms? It gets to a point the person wants a hit as much to get rid of the physical withdrawal symptoms than the (likely) psychological problems that made them start in the first place. You're right in that people do have to want to go clean but that's because they need to be in a place where they are going to be able to first get over the struggle of withdrawal and then be able to deal with the problems that made them start in the first place.

Babies born to drug addicts will be on methadone programmes a lot of the time because their bodies are addicted. If addiction wasn't a real thing can you give your thoughts on why this happens?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bairnardo said:
1 hour ago, Dee Man said:
I can sympathise with anyone who ends up a user for escapism due to being sexually abused or any other traumatic experiences that they'd rather block out but lets not pretend every junkie is a victim of a terrible childhood. 
Purely anecdotal, but when we were growing up one of our mates had a brother who was a skaghead - the guy was a state. We told our mate to avoid taking that route at all costs as his brother started regularly offering him 'a fix' but unfortunately he ended up following the same path. This in turn led to his easily influenced best mate getting hooked as well. Both of these guys came from stable backgrounds and were well warned by their peers of the consequences which they were already well aware of anyway. I was talking to his girlfriend one day who said he came home with a black bin bag which she later went through and found a load of stolen goods including war medals. She broke up with him, all of us told him to do one and he left town soon after. He's dead now after deliberately taking an overdose while his brother who got him into it is still alive.
Obviously there is no way to calculate the percentage of junkies who have chosen to do so for escapism linked to trauma and those who have chosen to out of boredom but I'm quite uneasy seeing junkies getting labelled as victims of society when that is not always the case. 
 

Once someone tries heroin for the buzz, they can then become victims of the illness that is addiction. It doesnt have to be one or the other. The other person saying its one or the other is tibbermoresaint, who in doing so is making a raging arse of himself.

 

Really?

Just for coming on here and expressing his opinion?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...