Billy Jean King Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 How does that boot leather taste?I suspect an error rate of 0.5% in registering individual vaccine doses is probably well under the NHS / Public Sector average. Add in the timescale the vaccine was administered over and the nature of the roll out ie away from surgeries and computer access I'd say it was no great surprise. What sort of error rate would you expect in such a scheme ?A hell of a lot of my work is compiling LA statistics and I've seen way worse accuracy on a regular basis. As I said I'm genuinely surprised there isn't more than 42k issues. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 6 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: I suspect an error rate of 0.5% in registering individual vaccine doses is probably well under the NHS / Public Sector average. Add in the timescale the vaccine was administered over and the nature of the roll out ie away from surgeries and computer access I'd say it was no great surprise. What sort of error rate would you expect in such a scheme ? A hell of a lot of my work is compiling LA statistics and I've seen way worse accuracy on a regular basis. As I said I'm genuinely surprised there isn't more than 42k issues. How many of those errors stop the people affected from doing things they want to? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest_Man#1 Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 6 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: I suspect an error rate of 0.5% in registering individual vaccine doses is probably well under the NHS / Public Sector average. Add in the timescale the vaccine was administered over and the nature of the roll out ie away from surgeries and computer access I'd say it was no great surprise. What sort of error rate would you expect in such a scheme ? A hell of a lot of my work is compiling LA statistics and I've seen way worse accuracy on a regular basis. As I said I'm genuinely surprised there isn't more than 42k issues. It’s actually far more than that as the 42,000 is only the number with major issues that weren’t solved quickly. I have no idea what typical error rates are, and frankly don’t care, as over 1% of double dosed people being excluded from many of the things that make life enjoyable is not acceptable for me, regardless of what a typical app error rate is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billy Jean King Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 It’s actually far more than that as the 42,000 is only the number with major issues that weren’t solved quickly. I have no idea what typical error rates are, and frankly don’t care, as over 1% of double dosed people being excluded from many of the things that make life enjoyable is not acceptable for me, regardless of what a typical app error rate is.I'm not saying it's acceptable especially not for those affected but it's not surprising given % error in public sector bodies. Housing benefit error runs between 3.5 and 5% a year. That has a far more reaching effect on people's lives but goes mostly ignored (that's error not fraud). In public sector settings 0.5% is a low error rate but obviously those directly affected are understandably not concerned by such facts. I'm just surprised that such an error rate is shocking people. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest_Man#1 Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 3 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said: 10 minutes ago, Honest_Man#1 said: It’s actually far more than that as the 42,000 is only the number with major issues that weren’t solved quickly. I have no idea what typical error rates are, and frankly don’t care, as over 1% of double dosed people being excluded from many of the things that make life enjoyable is not acceptable for me, regardless of what a typical app error rate is. I'm not saying it's acceptable especially not for those affected but it's not surprising given % error in public sector bodies. Housing benefit error runs between 3.5 and 5% a year. That has a far more reaching effect on people's lives but goes mostly ignored (that's error not fraud). In public sector settings 0.5% is a low error rate but obviously those directly affected are understandably not concerned by such facts. I'm just surprised that such an error rate is shocking people. I’m certainly not shocked at all, more furious that people are being fucked over by it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 50 minutes ago, Honest_Man#1 said: How does that boot leather taste? SIMPly delicious 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 Hahahahahahahaha 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 (edited) How many times do you think our 'experts' need to get it wildly wrong before they shut up and stop making bold claims? It simply shouldn't be the case that posters on a thread in P&B's General Nonsense forum can look at historic and current data trends and more accurately predict future positions than our supposed experts on a regular basis. They come across as being so entrenched in their view that Covid is new and unique (and absolutely not flu so nothing that flu related can apply) that decades of scientific data from previous respiratory virus outbreaks is just cast aside, and the wheel tried to be re-invented at every turn, to the point that what appears rather obvious to a layman not only seems invisible to them, but must be wrong. Edited November 4, 2021 by Todd_is_God 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 13 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: It simply shouldn't be the case that posters on a thread in P&B's General Nonsense forum can look at historic and current data trends and more accurately predict future positions than our supposed experts on a regular basis. On 19/08/2020 at 12:17, Todd_is_God said: 3 deaths on the NRS weekly report this week (around 0.3% of total deaths), and deaths 8% below the 5 year average. And people still think it's a public health crisis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 "Regular basis" ≠ "always" But, as always, thanks for simping. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 1 minute ago, Todd_is_God said: "Regular basis" ≠ "always" But, as always, thanks for simping. Your misplaced arrogance never ceases to amaze. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Todd_is_God Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Your misplaced arrogance never ceases to amaze. I said "posters." Plural. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 4, 2021 Share Posted November 4, 2021 4 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said: I said "posters." Plural. @Elixir will be delighted. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted November 4, 2021 Author Share Posted November 4, 2021 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glennie Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 9 hours ago, oaksoft said: The Tories probably cannot believe their luck that they have managed to get an idiotic public to blame non-mask wearers and the unvaccinated for the current situation simply by continuing to publish and highlight case numbers as being the be-all and end-all. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Glennie Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 (edited) 5 hours ago, Todd_is_God said: How many times do you think our 'experts' need to get it wildly wrong before they shut up and stop making bold claims? they will never admit theyre bullshitters on the take the news and papers will give them air time as long as theyre saying the right things Edited November 5, 2021 by Glennie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 8 hours ago, welshbairn said: @Elixir will be delighted. One thing is for sure: the Main Event would be providing far better advice to the Scottish Government than Jase, Linda and Devi. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elixir Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 8 hours ago, ICTChris said: Absolutely farcical that we are still employing track and trace - sorry, 'test and protect', at this stage. An utter pantomime. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellaboz Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 This is all a fucking sham now. Everywhere. If lockouts start happening again, there'll be proper riots. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigDoddyKane Posted November 5, 2021 Share Posted November 5, 2021 10 hours ago, ICTChris said: Id demand a not guilty verdict based on no entry 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.