Todays scores 2/4

[Talbot supporter]

in all honesty that first half was 45 minutes of rudimentary kick-and-rush dung during which  neither team laid a glove on the other, and a let down for any neutral turning up expecting a cracker. The over-reliance on the long ball would have made you greet as the game was reduced to an exhibition of who's CBs could heid the ball away the best.
the Pollok 4 and 5 looked like they were strolling it until Talbot changed things about with the triple sub. This introduced some vision and trickery from Shankland and the industry of Wilson and Boylan, and  Pollok were put on the back foot.  Talbot can trouble most teams when Samson is getting workable service, and for the last 20 mins he ran Pollok ragged at the back and could/ should have had a hat trick.  
Also, I didn't catch who made the wee dinked pass to Shankland before the equaliser but it was absolutely superb and a great example of the things that can happen when Talbot attempt to play the ball on the deck a bit more plus it actually looks like less effort than chasing lost causes!  

This is bang on , said something similar myself

[Killiepiyo]

1 hour ago, andy25 said:

Killiepiyo will be on saying your a troll .

Not at all, he uses the caps lock when required, has a balanced view, weights it in evidence and doesn't feel the need to target specific players in his summary.

[jimbaxters]

2 hours ago, andy25 said:

Killiepiyo will be on saying your a troll .
Perfect summary.

See what a bit of meat on the bones does, pal? That's an objective view there by Shanner. You obviously agree that it's not all bad based on the part of your post I've put in bold. For us miles away, it's much better to see Talbot fans being realistic. 

You know it makes sense!