Jump to content

Hibs v Celtic


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Hoose Rice said:

It's not at all.  How many times per week does a player get touched in the box, get a shot off and then the analysis is a players been too honest, if they went down instead of taking the shot it would be a penalty? 

I've not much seen double jeopardy, player gets to take free shot at goal and if not scored they get a penalty regardless.  Why?  Because it's not a rule.  Ref played the advantage, the advantage was to hit a shot at goal and he missed.  A shambles it got brought back and especially when there's no concrete proof it was in the box. 

The referee didn't play advantage for a foul before he hit the shot, because the foul happened after he hit the shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Dunning1874 said:

The referee didn't play advantage for a foul before he hit the shot, because the foul happened after he hit the shot.

There was no foul because the shot had occurred, it’s why the referee never called a foul.  And again, it wasn’t even in the box.

Is there many other examples of this being correct and penalty’s given in these circumstances because I can’t remember many at all. 
 

If Kyogo has scored with the shot would that be disallowed because of the following infringement or does that only come into play if the shot is missed? 

Edited by Hoose Rice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, gannonball said:

I think your eyes are trolling you mate, on a head that has been detached for some time now.

With all due respect, f**k off and you are out of order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hoose Rice said:

There was no foul because the shot had occurred, it’s why the referee never called a foul.  And again, it wasn’t even in the box.

If someone slides right through an opponent after they've played a pass in the centre circle, is there no foul because the pass has occurred?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Dunning1874 said:

If someone slides right through an opponent after they've played a pass in the centre circle, is there no foul because the pass has occurred?

There’s a difference between a pass in the middle of the pitch and a player having a strike at goal.  If there’s not a difference you will be able to provide a few examples of this happening previously? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Hoose Rice said:

Screenshot 2024-02-08 023109.png

I have seen this still going around, but it isn't Johnston who heads the ball from this free-kick; it is Scales, who is about ten yards onside. Johnston only becomes active in the next phase, by which time he is onside. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Hoose Rice said:

There was no foul because the shot had occurred, it’s why the referee never called a foul.  And again, it wasn’t even in the box.

Is there many other examples of this being correct and penalty’s given in these circumstances because I can’t remember many at all. 
 

If Kyogo has scored with the shot would that be disallowed because of the following infringement or does that only come into play if the shot is missed? 

Is that a serious post? Firstly, of course the foul is in the box. Secondly, any foul in the box while the ball is in play, regardless of where the ball is when the foul occurs is a penalty. When Rangers number one fanboy, Kenny Miller, says it was a penalty, you have no case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

Is that a serious post? Firstly, of course the foul is in the box. Secondly, any foul in the box while the ball is in play, regardless of where the ball is when the foul occurs is a penalty. When Rangers number one fanboy, Kenny Miller, says it was a penalty, you have no case.

Can Celtic fans analyse anything without mentioning Rangers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

Is that a serious post? Firstly, of course the foul is in the box. Secondly, any foul in the box while the ball is in play, regardless of where the ball is when the foul occurs is a penalty. When Rangers number one fanboy, Kenny Miller, says it was a penalty, you have no case.

You will have a few other examples to demonstrate this then, should be easy enough.  Go for it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hoose Rice said:

You will have a few other examples to demonstrate this then, should be easy enough.  Go for it. 

No examples required. One of the easier Laws of the Game to understand. Are you seriously saying that a foul on an attacker in the box whilst the ball is in play, isn’t a penalty? 

Just now, Hoose Rice said:

Kenny Miller is a former Celtic player working for old firm tv.  

For anyone listening to the Sky Sports coverage on Tuesday of the Rangers/Aberdeen match, there is absolutely no doubt who former Celtic player, Kenny Miller, is a fan of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...