Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 5 minutes ago, pawpar said: Aussies ken the score - http://metro.co.uk/2017/04/21/major-breakthrough-in-madeleine-mccann-case-discovered-by-film-crew-6588140/ No shit Sherlock. And criminal profiler Pat Brown reveals she believes Kate and Gerry McCann are ‘lying and concealing guilt’ about the disappearance. Right you P&B convicts, keep us appraised. The exact details about the latest ‘major breakthrough’ will not be revealed until the TV show airs on Sunday evening in Australia. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerberus Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 They c***s probably think a dingo stole it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shotgun Posted April 21, 2017 Share Posted April 21, 2017 And criminal profiler Pat Brown reveals she believes Kate and Gerry McCann are ‘lying and concealing guilt’ about the disappearance. Groundbreaking stuff there. Has anyone considered this option before? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swarley Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 No shit Sherlock.And criminal profiler Pat Brown reveals she believes Kate and Gerry McCann are ‘lying and concealing guilt’ about the disappearance. Right you P&B convicts, keep us appraised.The exact details about the latest ‘major breakthrough’ will not be revealed until the TV show airs on Sunday evening in Australia. I'd rather not. It's just shit tabloid tv for morons. But, if I remember, I'll watch and report back. I'll guarantee that it won't be anything ground breaking. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 (edited) 32 minutes ago, Swarley said: I'd rather not. It's just shit tabloid tv for morons. But, if I remember, I'll watch and report back. I'll guarantee that it won't be anything ground breaking. What, they won't be digging her up? Edited April 22, 2017 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swarley Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 What, they won't be digging her up? We'll find out tomorrow night 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 22, 2017 Share Posted April 22, 2017 18 minutes ago, welshbairn said: What, they won't be digging her up? They could dig Gerrymandering up. "Gerry, you're a smarmy, lying cùnt". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 23, 2017 Share Posted April 23, 2017 She was either kidnapped................ ................or the spooks covered up her demise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 8 hours ago, Zen Archer said: She was either kidnapped................ ................or the spooks covered up her demise. What these c***s will stoop to to try and sell their crap papers. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reggie Perrin Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 If she was snatched to order, I wonder if the new "family" leave her alone whilst they go out on the pish. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Lambies Doos Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 Smuggled into Africa? Surely someone would have noticed this happening 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted April 24, 2017 Share Posted April 24, 2017 10 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said: Smuggled into Africa? Surely someone would have noticed this happening Depends what she was smuggled in for. Adoption, maybe. Spare ribs, not so much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zen Archer (Raconteur) Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Her mother Kate described the approaching 10th anniversary as a "horrible marker of time, stolen time". Is this what she's calling the time she was away from the apartment now? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39706194 This c**t is worse than Inspector Clouseau. Asked if police were any closer to solving the case than they were six years ago, Mr Rowley said: "I know we have a significant line of inquiry which is worth pursuing, and because it's worth pursuing it could provide an answer, but until we've gone through it I won't know whether we are going to get there or not." But he added that "there was no reason whatsoever" to suspect Madeleine's parents were involved in her disappearance. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dindeleux Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 If the parents weren't involved then I think the worst part now would be that they really don't know what she looks like. As a result every time they see a child anywhere with any sort of resemblance it must be hard not to want to ask the people with said child a lot of questions about their kid in an accusing manner. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 7 hours ago, Dindeleux said: If the parents weren't involved then I think the worst part now would be that they really don't know what she looks like. As a result every time they see a child anywhere with any sort of resemblance it must be hard not to want to ask the people with said child a lot of questions about their kid in an accusing manner. Nah, she's got that funny eye thing we were all supposed to be looking out for. A bit like the twitch Gerry gets anytime he sees a spade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sugna Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 7 hours ago, Zen Archer said: Rowley said: "I know we have a significant line of inquiry which is worth pursuing, and because it's worth pursuing it could provide an answer..." Completely misunderstands causality IMO. It would be reasonable to say, "... because it could provide an answer, it's worth pursuing..." Also, while there may be no reason to conclude that G&K were involved, there's plenty of reason to suspect it. Again, Rowley's thinking seems a bit addled. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTJohnboy Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 8 hours ago, Zen Archer said: Her mother Kate described the approaching 10th anniversary as a "horrible marker of time, stolen time". Is this what she's calling the time she was away from the apartment now? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-39706194 This c**t is worse than Inspector Clouseau. Asked if police were any closer to solving the case than they were six years ago, Mr Rowley said: "I know we have a significant line of inquiry which is worth pursuing, and because it's worth pursuing it could provide an answer, but until we've gone through it I won't know whether we are going to get there or not." But he added that "there was no reason whatsoever" to suspect Madeleine's parents were involved in her disappearance. 8 hours ago, Dindeleux said: If the parents weren't involved then I think the worst part now would be that they really don't know what she looks like. As a result every time they see a child anywhere with any sort of resemblance it must be hard not to want to ask the people with said child a lot of questions about their kid in an accusing manner. 57 minutes ago, sugna said: Completely misunderstands causality IMO. It would be reasonable to say, "... because it could provide an answer, it's worth pursuing..." Also, while there may be no reason to conclude that G&K were involved, there's plenty of reason to suspect it. Again, Rowley's thinking seems a bit addled. The parents were involved. It was entirely due to their neglect that this child disappeared. That they've never been charged with child neglect, and have since gone on to become some kind of celebrities in the eyes of the media is a fucking obscenity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 18 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said: The parents were involved. It was entirely due to their neglect that this child disappeared. That they've never been charged with child neglect, and have since gone on to become some kind of celebrities in the eyes of the media is a fucking obscenity. That's the good old fair-minded MSM and PCS for you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 2 hours ago, ICTJohnboy said: The parents were involved. It was entirely due to their neglect that this child disappeared. That they've never been charged with child neglect, and have since gone on to become some kind of celebrities in the eyes of the media is a fucking obscenity. I don't think they want to be celebs but if publicity keeps the hunt going for their daughter then fair enough. Being a father of a little girl I can't think of anything worse than her going missing, especially if I could have prevented it. Fair play to the parents because I would have probably topped myself by now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Ferrino Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Can't be long now 'till the Express / Mail are doing photofits of her in a Bikini / Lingerie. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.