Let's look through the whole statement.
First paragraph is academic. Correct.
Second Paragraph. To be honest, I'd regard most of that as correct as well. Griffiths will play for Scotland and we could have earned a lot more than £100k for his sale. Brightest prospect part? Perhaps not the brightest, but up there.
Third paragraph once again, very much correct.
Fourth paragraph is completely wrong. Halving the crowd by saying the wrong time? I think not.
From the fourth paragraph, I'd say you're correct when you think we don't have a core support of 1500. The rest is correct because as fans we do have those memories we can cherish.
Finally, the following is correct from the last paragraph.
"This is a club that has contributed massively to Scottish football in recent years." - Like it or not, it has. Our CIS Cup win can't be erased and through our youth system we have produced talents that will without a doubt, play for Scotland in the future. And before you say it, by developing the youngsters correctly we have contributed in recent years. Our jaunt into Europe also raised Scotland's coefficient until recently.
Our club isn't rotten to the core simply because the fans aren't rotten to the core despite what many on here think. Just normal fans who want to enjoy their team's success as much as any other club's fans. Assetless, I'll give you.
Financially viable, I'd like to think this could be correct in the future if we are given the chance.
Next sentence is correct in my mind despite there being a few clubs in the Performance league.
The following part about keeping us up, most likely isn't.
"Take away this platform so cheaply and you could lose at least 1 future Scotland star from the game" - Correct because of the fact he has put the word could in the sentence.
And with the final sentence, I'd like to think it's correct. Perhaps you don't agree but I'd imagine you'd miss getting the chance to beat us four times in a season, just a little bit.