ayrmad

I don't think that's what I posted, I posted that in matches where someone starts the match at 1.1 the most cash is still on them by the end of the match even when they are getting scudded, most of the cash bet on the matches is usually in play by the way.

I suggested it as a reason in this case, I'm not Willie Hill so I've no idea what their exposure is. Why is it on tennis that almost every time there's a player at 1.1 or thereabouts that that player attracts almost all the cash, this is something that happens thousands of times a year not occasionally, you can have a player that started at 1.1 getting absolutely scudded and yet they have still attracted most of the cash. Real Madrid trading at ~1.42 tonight, 89% of cash.

This happens many times a day on Betfair, the shorter the odds the more money it attracts that's why betting the home "certainties" in the EPL returns a profit long term, the bookies are only looking to balance the books not tell you what they're probability of particular outcome is, perhaps they shortened their odds to attract the big wedges so their exposure wasn't so dire in the event of a YES vote, who knows, it certainly wasn't done because of anything that was happening in the independence debate as far as I can see.

Go and look at a game of tennis on betfair, tomorrow Novak is trading at 1.08 against Gilles Simon and Novak has attracted £4795 out of £4861 already bet.

I certainly didn't vote the same way as you up here and Reynard was the only other voice I recall voting my way at Westminster.

When you go down that route you're only highlighting how shite both systems are.

As far as I know that's the norm now, I think it might be 8 out 10 and higher.

You'd be better asking a SNP voter like H_B that question, I got the government I voted for at Westminster and I didn't get the one I voted for at Holyrood.

I agree wholeheartedly, the Labour party that presents itself for election is not the one we will receive if the British public were daft enough to vote them in. They are a bunch of conmen/women who'd run their granny over for a bit of power. The road to hell is paved with good intentions.

I don't know but I'm not sure whether a NO vote or a Labour majority will fill me with more disgust at the electorate, thankfully polls don't make prizes.

Polling the right people.

I didn't realise we were having two.

You must have purchased your calculator from poundland.

John Boyle is the area manager.

It's actually quite worrying that you were able to get into uni.

It will never be anything else unless Westminster wants rid of us. At least I now know for certain that there's no such thing as a fair and balanced media.

A quarter of those polled read broadsheets, nearly the same number that don't read papers.

Why change the habits of a lifetime now that the big 5 0 is appearing on the horizon.

Probably a wise decision.

What do they mean by newspaper type?

Obviously in your part of Ayr running away equates to intelligence, where I'm from it's the sign of a shitebag.

I think my interpretation of that is fine.

You seem to be jizzing in your boxers about the thought of Labour taking over from the SNP up here, are you right in the head?

So they lost the chance of victory that they never had, is that what you're saying?

NO, you pissed off because you made a rip roaring c**t of yourself.