Nicely, if sarcastically, explained.
I 'understand' the System ©, though I'm not as enamoured by it as some seem to be. Yes, we've made a decent fist of contending for 3rd place with it, but it's all been a bit desperate at times, with a fair few trundling OGs winning or snatching draws for us. I'd buy into it more if the three behind had a decent tally to balance out Fletcher's zero goals (leaving Gibraltar out of it), but instead we have (again leaving Gibraltar out of the equation):
Anya: 1 goal
Maloney: 2 goals
Naismith: 1 goal
OG: 3 goals
That's very poor IMO. I don't expect each of them to be in double figures, but that tally above is really bare minimum stuff.
It kind of feels to me like the System (Ltd) is:
a) easier on the eye than the Levein tosh
b) more steady than the Levein era (not hard to achieve)
but
c) while we have the players we do, it'll never be more than a treading water approach.
Going for something bolder would be a massive risk and could shatter the morale (though that's already feeling a bit shaky) that WGS has built up.
I'd still love to see us develop the 4-4-1-1 that saw us play Croatia off the park 2-0, Naismith and Snodgrass linking up as the two forward players. That just felt a lot more dangerous without being a massive shift from the 4-2-3-1... probably because it meant that at least one striker could spend his time looking forward while the other offered the defensive/hold up stuff.