If you think anything posted on this last page is 'over the top' then the internet isn't for you. It's little to do with resources that Archie chooses to play the style of football he has done this season. It matters to the extent that we don't have as big a squad as others but team selection suggests it's not down to restrictions placed on the budget. We start most games with 8 defensive players out of 11, 7 if you want to be generous and pretend Welsh is meant to be more attacking than whatever it is he actually does. If it was down to resources instead of a conscious choice of the management then we wouldn't have had Muirhead and Fraser on the bench for the 1st half of the season with the more conservative 3 of Bannigan, Welsh and Osman playing week in week out. Even when another more attacking option was used it tended to be in place of Lawless or Amoo rather than breaking up the midfield 3 whereas in previous seasons we were far more likely to play with 2 central midfielders, the usual 2 attacking wide players and a more attacking player in behind the striker. We've went from being a team where defensive responsbility was left pretty much to the keeper, the 2 central defenders and a holding midfielder whilst the full backs and the rest of the midfield bombed on to 1 where yesterday anything attacking wise was left to 3 players, there's probably an answer to our problems somewhere in the middle of the 2.
The current system makes the team much more difficult to beat but much less easy on the eye. It's hardly sacrilege for pointing it out and discussing what level of progress is required in order to accept a decline in the quality of football.