Jump to content

Jinky67

Gold Members
  • Posts

    6,515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Jinky67

  1. I think you will find i was pretty quick to condemn anyone singing that song in the relevant match threads on here. I also did the same on twitter it’s a fucking horrible song as should be nowhere near a football game. I’m hardly a shrinking violet when it comes to calling this shit out in both directions
  2. Is there any other country in the world that would allow such an organisation to exist nevermind allowing them to publicly flaunt their hatred?
  3. One of the very first things the OO started to do way back in the 19th century was to campaign pro actively against any legislation allowing Catholic worship. Please explain how the f**k that isn’t anti-Catholic? Anyone defending the existence of this organisation especially in the 21st century needs to take themselves away and launch themselves in the sea. Segregation, exclusivity based on religion is the very foundation sectarian grows from and thrives in. The once believed fair minded Rangers fans on this forum have properly let themselves down here….
  4. Care to explain what those cultish, religious origins are and make yourself look even more intolerant?
  5. You have to be a complete simpleton to be ignorant to the context. Gazza could claim ignorance when he 1st done it, he can’t now and is pandering to the fuckwit orange element of your support. It isn’t a bigoted gesture in itself but add context of where it is and to whom then it is a really really stupid thing to do and incites a sectarian response however Gazza will do just about anything to be liked. I wish I could feel sorry for him but I don’t
  6. We are laughing everywhere not just at the back. An organisation that stands to campaign against Catholic worship, has its member declare the never have been a RC or papist and even today don’t allow members to marry a practising Catholic Yeah they are a beacon of tolerance and inclusivity
  7. Yeah he was dropping sly references in the Rangers thread about what we should be more worried about. However he outed himself as an absolute fucking weapon on that thread.
  8. We have a site in Stockport so in Manchester a couple of times a year and I can’t recall ever being asked if you re Rangers or Celtic as the first question You have some talent for talking shite you. Anyway back on point what is it I should be so worried about?
  9. I don’t see Manchester rolling out the red carpet anytime soon do you? You aren’t even welcome in your own city centre after last seasons nonsense. What about Celtic mate? Is it possible for you to reply to a point about your own club without going whit aboot Celtic? You claim you don’t want to be associated with us yet at the first opportunity you try make it about Celtic Don’t you see the irony in that? And what problems do we have that i should be worried about? You have dropped this a couple of times in this thread so feel free to spell it out for us as you are fucking itching for a nibble on it
  10. Celtic were 67% pre pandemic however that rose to 85% during the pandemic. I imagine this should come down now fans are back and we have fat we can cut in the likes of Ajeti, Barkas, Bolingoli etc
  11. True but rich people don’t stay rich by continuing to throw millions down a black hole and there inevitably comes a point even for them that it becomes unsustainable. And a return for them doesn’t necessarily mean a return on the £ but they will want to see success, if Rangers don’t win the league and get entry to the Champions League and they lose many of their best players during the summer which is likely (Morelos, Kent and Goldson being the most likely) then these investors who are obviously smart people will start to question if it’s worth it.
  12. No mate I’m not, in any scenario a company posting losses equivalent to half their turnover and reliant on borrowing to survive from investors, who will want to see a return on that and not more losses, have a need to generate more revenue not a want especially in a unique point in time where a recession is at its highest level in generations, Rangers costs to operate are going up significantly and fans have less money to spend. Rangers have to win the league this year, have to…… majority of your sellable assets are in the last year or going into the last year of their contracts. The Europa League money helps however it’s only 1 stage further than last year and you still posted higher losses than the entire league combined. Generally you are the solitary sensible Rangers poster on here but for you to be firmly in the denial camp is surprising. You lot are asking the wrong questions of your board and when (not if) it goes tits up and your investors stop funnelling loans to cover losses because they are loosing millions then I highly doubt there will be another 5 way agreement to give you a backdoor back in, this time the lid on the coffin will be nailed shut. However for us on the outside looking in, the denial to what the reality is is much more amusing so crack on. We laughed then, we will laugh again
  13. Turns over 50 million a year but posts 24 millions losses a year but they don’t need the money in a league where payments for TV and winning the league is pittance Like i said head in the sand even your board have stated they need to raise capital to plug holes. In fact aren’t you due your new monthly share issue? The clubs good name? Where in the world apart from maybe NI do Rangers and their fans have a good name? Regularly fined and banned by UEFA for racist and anti- catholic singing, known for rioting away and amongst themselves and the club being financially mismanaged and avoiding paying their debts. In what circles does this constitute Rangers having a good name?
  14. Their entire songbook is devoted to that team and their fans so this notion that they want nothing to do with anything we are a part of is as you say … shite. It’s solely because they are the B side of this particular fixture and reportedly being paid less for it too
  15. He wasn’t his most effective but hes never at his most effective from out wide but ineffective? No not completely especially if you compare that to the performance of Kent and Diallo in the reverse fixture.
  16. Heard this line a few times and whilst you guys keep swallowing this shite that investors will keep swallowing losses it will be the undertaker your club needs (again) and not an undertaking. 24 million loses and it’s a shrug of the shoulders….wild
  17. These are losses that amount to more than half of your annual turnover, you think that’s sustainable or is a functional way to operate your business? We are also about to hit the worst recession in a generation or 2 which will impact your revenue and operating expenses further. So again you fellas don’t seem to learn do you?
  18. Are his pockets 25 yards deep? I seem to remember said centre back being completely missing in action when Kyogo was in yards of space to square for Eddie to fluff
  19. If your posting 24 million quid losses then it would suggest your budgeting strategy is fubar and all revenue becomes necessary and not a bonus. You fellas really don’t seem to learn do you?
  20. Yet the club needs the money so will go where the money is because if recent history tells us anything is that they can’t rely on those fans currently complaining to put their hands in their pockets to pull them out of the shit
×
×
  • Create New...