Jump to content

welshbairn

Platinum Members
  • Posts

    69,312
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by welshbairn

  1. Better posting here than on the God Botherers thread:

    Where do Scottish churches get their money to pay ministers a half decent wage? I've done a quick Google search and seen answers involving church-goers donating a tenth of their gross income but part of me thinks most of the answers are from across the pond where you get the hardcore "can I get an amen? Yeah! Hallelujah, prasie the lord!" types) and that folk over here won't donate anything close to that.

    If most church goers in a small church like the one in my old village stick in about a fiver during collections, surely there's no way the minister can make a living out of that alone? :huh:

    They used to get a pretty modest wage but a big Manse to live in. Don't know what it's like now, I think they've sold off most of the Manses and they still get a low salary. They probably get to go to Heaven though, which you could see as a non taxable benefit on top of a pension, the scammers.dry.gif

    Correction. Looks like they're on £40,000 a year, not bad for one gig a week. My link

  2. How can they attempt to get money out of an account that they do not have access to (i.e. it's not an account that has anything to do with Rangers FC) to get funds that are there because of a deal they say was flawed and therefore does not stand up.

    If the deal shouldn't have gone ahead, then the money is not theirs!

    Exactly, they can't have it both ways. I think Duff and Phelps are trying anything to make sure there's money to pay their fees..

  3. My reading of the Retard story might suggest that this wouldn't be paid out as the very integrity of the deal is being brought into question (in much the same way that my car insurance wouldn't be paying out for an accident if I had omitted to put it through an MOT).

    It did seem weird that they would hand over the £24 million a month before he even had the keys to Ibrox. Either he's a hugely convincing conman or there's some brown envelopes stuffed with cash been passed around.

  4. You really couldn't make any of this up.

    It seems to me that Ticketus either made a truly insane decision in giving Whyte this money even prior to his purchase of the club, or that, as I've previously suspected, there was a lot more to this deal with Whyte being a patsy.

    Based on this story, assuming the adminstrators aren't simply making a desperate and probably futile throw of the dice attempt to claw back some funds, then the former scenario applies. This is very difficult to get your head round, and actually now looks as though it is Ticketus that was the patsy, and either Whyte or the puppet-master had this outcome in mind all along.

    FFS, talk about murky....

    Ticketus will have Credit Default Insurance to mitigate any loss, but the interesting thing would be if Whyte was telling the truth when he said he was personally liable for the debt. Has he been living it up in Castle Grant and Monaco without a pot to piss in, at the same time as bankrupting Rangers? That would be funny as fcuk! laugh.gif

  5. Because the SPL were mad.

    The fact that they had to join the list of creditors of a busted flush shows the consequences of that madness.

    I don't see the mass disruption. The liquidated team's games to date become null and void, the league table is reset and onward everyone else goes.

    I think the rules are that each game previously played is considered a 3-0 loss to Rangers, which benefits sides who were unsuccessful against them.

  6. As the risk of being pedantic, you may want to pick up a book yourself - a dictionary for a start. It's "Shakespearian", not "Shakesperian".

    :P

    Table 1. Non-literary references (1564-1616):

    Shakespeare

    Shakespere

    Shakespear

    Shakspeare

    Shackspeare

    Shakspere

    Shackespeare

    Shackspere

    Shackespere

    Shaxspere

    Shexpere

    Shakspe~

    Shaxpere

    Shagspere

    Shaksper

    Shaxpeare

    Shaxper

    Shake-speare

    Shakespe

    Shakp

    Table 2. Literary references (1593-1616):

    Shakespeare

    Shake-speare

    Shakspeare

    Shaxberd

    Shakespere

    Shakespear

    Shak-speare

    Shakspear

    Shakspere

    Shaksper

    Schaksp.

    Shakespheare

    Shakespe

    Shakspe

  7. I think that the situation can best be summed up in the immortal words of Donald Rumsfeld as follows.............

    There are known knowns. These are things we know that we know. There are known unknowns. That is to say, there are things that we know we don't know. But there are also unknown unknowns. There are things we don't know we don't know."

    Thank you Roddy Forsyth.

    Rumsfeld got seriously ridiculed for that but it was about the only time he made any sense.

  8. What happens to a bullet when a gun is fired into the air?

    Does it leave the earth's atmosphere or does it disintegrate on it's way back down? :huh: I just have this vision of some guy walking along the street getting hit by a bullet from the sky :lol:

    Take your pick rolleyes.gif

    A) A bullet fired directly upwards will travel at a rate of around 7 miles/second, exceeding the escape velocity of earth and continuing into space. Depending on what direction the earth is facing at the point of firing, the bullet will end it's days drawn into the massive gravity wells of either Jupiter or the sun.

    B)Depending on what kind of bullet and the altitude it is fired from, a bullet can reach up to 3 miles if fired straight up. Terminal velocity on the way back down can be up to 500 feet per second, at 200 ft/sec the skull will usually be penetrated. Although relatively rare, mortality rates for being hit by a falling bullet are much higher than being hit by a bullet fired horizontally despite the much slower speed, because of the likelihood of being hit in the head.

  9. Given the latest revelations in the last few posts, all I can say is... MORE POPCORN! Anybody know who the guests are on tonight's episode of Scotland's favourite soap...or, 'Newsnight Scotland' if you prefer.

    Mark Daly says he's going to be on BB1 Scotland news at 6.30 and Newsnight Scotland at 11, but he said he was going to be on Newsnight last night and wasn't unless I missed it..

×
×
  • Create New...