Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo

Worst Village People tribute act ever IMO.

I'm afraid that isn't how it works. This year's season ticket money isn't included as turnover - £8.2 million is included in 'Deferred Income' and will be included in the next set of accounts as Turnover. Note 2 'Revenue' gives a breakdown of the £19 million total.

£1.8 million outstanding per the accounts.

There is still £2.4 million season ticket cash to come in (Note 15).

Note 20 - Deferred Tax 'No deferred tax asset has been recognised as it is not considered probable that there will be future taxable profits available in the foreseeable future to utilise the losses' Doesn't look like anyone expects Champions League in the foreseeable future then. Shame. Also I notice Imran Ahmad received a £50k 'Arrangement' fee on a £200k loan. Great work if you can get it. Where is HBCA anyway? Nobody has had a 2+2=50,000 moment yet.

Is there an upper limit for a 'hassle free' bank transfer? I want to transfer cash between accounts but can't be arsed with additional security nonsense or having to wait days for it to clear.

Logic tells me that having those type of players causes an insolvency event.

I'd like to know who sponsors the sprint competition in the Tour Of Britain. I'm not sure if the ITV commentators have mentioned it.

I'm not sure if this absolutely counts as a different style, but one of my all time favourite tracks is: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSqgAP67vAQ The Bee Gees version is utter pish.

I'm fairly certain I went to Fir Park for a final once. Many moons ago. Doesn't change the fact that it has always been played at a diddy stadium. ETA: Fir Park has hosted the final 4 times.

Sky Sports News have just reported Horner missed an out of competition test last night/this morning. Allegedly he was staying at a different hotel than the rest of the team so wasn't there when the testers showed up. More to come on this, I'm sure.

Great keeper. IMO.

HBCA?

Not according to Alan Kilpatrick. He's 'studied' Criminology: I think he should be sent to Peru as an expert witness with marvellous insights like that. ETA: Has anyone worked out where the 'Peru' photos were actually taken yet? I don't know what Peru in August is like but I'm guessing it isn't bikini weather?

I'm sorry, but your comprehension is fucking abysmal: You asked me: I replied: To anyone that isn't a retard that sounds like I would 100% put my life savings on omission, not that I was 100% certain that it was omitted. Twat.

I never said for a second I was 100% certain that was not the case.

Omitted. 100%. I bet you can't work out why either. This is from the original post: Seriously, WTF?

To be fair to Bennett you just made that bit up. There is no guarantee that figure is inclusive of the IPO money.

Passed my final Professional Accountancy exam. No more exams to do. Ever. Beer tonight, methinks.

This = amazing. This + baking sunshine = fucking amazing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGvcdr1A0p0

£5 each way on Bertie at 16/1. Let's hope he had steak for dinner last night.

There is absolutely zero need for me to point you to the same thing I have referenced more than once in the last couple of pages. You must have the accounts open anyway since you are going to refer me to the bit that says the potential tax liability is included.

Exactly how taking numbers straight off the accounts is guessing I don't know? I have told you exactly where to go on the accounts for a breakdown. I have told you that there is nothing in the accounts alluding to a £30+million potential tax liability. I have told you that in each section of the breakdown there isn't a single number that could cover the potential tax liability. I haven't guessed on anything. As I said earlier why would liabilities be published in the accounts not be liabilities (unless they are contingent liabilities which would be mentioned in the notes)? I've lifted it all from the Rangers accounts. In black & white. Yet you mysteriously seem unable to tell me where the accounts tell everyone that the potential tax liablity is included. I think we can all draw our own conclusions from that. ETA: to clarify the liabilities line

No I haven't. I've taken Creditors due within a year and added it to Creditors due outwith a year. To give, well, Total Creditors.