wingsoverperthshire

Good post and although I believe yes is nearer 35% solid, I largely agree the middle ground is where it will be won and lost.

The problem with the Polls is we simply don't know who to trust. The No campaign is either just in front or way in front so either Panelbase or YouGov hasn't been honest and should be discredited. The Daily mail polls can be completely shredding for the bin. Their results "Claiming" labour is polling considerably higher than the SNP renders any information gathered worthless. They're polls are skewed.

Commenting on the debate in the House of Commons today on the Lords amendment to the Energy bill - and in particular Amendment 54 which removed the Scottish parliament’s powers in respect of renewables obligation in Scotland, SNP Energy spokesman Mike Weir said : “This is an outrageous example of the unionist parties ganging up to remove powers from the Scottish parliament . Worse still they did so by introducing last–minute amendments in the un-elected House of Lords, rather than even having the courage to debate it on the floor of the House of Commons. “There was no consultation with the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliament prior to the introduction of this amendment, nor when challenged in the Commons did the minister or his Labour front bench counterpart have any reasonable explanation as to why this happened in such an underhand manner. “This is yet another example of Tories and Labour ganging up at Westminster against Scotland’s interests and removing powers from Scotland. Whilst the NO campaign talk about vague promises of more powers if people vote NO, the reality is they are removing Scotland’s existing powers by stealth. “The only way it can be stopped is with a YES vote next September.”

nhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-25187623

The Yes Camp are behind and private polling suggests this. It also suggest that Daily Mail/ Yougov polls are rigged.

Funny video this if you haven't seen, released tonight.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuX_NJwu6L4

Just shows what happens when conversation flows and negatively is trumped by facts and vision. I've been calling for a section our better Yes posters to diversify into other forums (Celtic and womans forums).

Cameo cinema, situated in tollcross might be what you're looking for. Although I'm not certain if your are allowed drink. You were allowed 10 years ago.

Pleasing to see a swing away from NO in the latest Daily Mail Joke poll. Remember the last poll? IIRC on the Scottish voting intentions Labour was miles ahead.

Kevin McKenna's piece was going good until........ "The following day at Holyrood, Johann Lamont, Labour's Scottish leader and an increasingly impressive performer in the chamber"

If a chopper lands on a pub last night, there is nothing to suggest it wont happen tonight. You're coming across as a very irresponsible parent.

Really depends when you lay. If No Scotland have a 15 point lead a month next August you will get bigger than 5's. Back now and lay after the big Tv debates involving Salmond would seen sensible.

Good to see Lex still utterly obsessed with odds.

I will do but only when we move into the latter phases of the campaign. This is your thread guys so direct questions on the campaigns page please Busta Nut (on the gel seat)

I will be putting something on Yes, but only a sum that wont overly bother me if we lose. Perhaps £100.

I'm not a bookmaker my idiotic onionist friend. I believe you were a ba' hair away from asking me for a direct bet. Should I take 5's from a credited bookie or evens from a seething bitter onionist?

If 5/1 reflects the chances of a YES victory then that's about the same as Chelsea winning the EPL. Absolutely all to play for and if I was pricing the odds I would go 10/11 Yes 11/10 No

Indeed. So why are you voting for westminister control? It was better together that spunked this money on the trams.

Lex in being obsessed with odds shocker. 5/1 wont last so get on it.

What questions would you like answered and who are you blaming for not answering them?

Should we have a sub-forum for Cycling ? There is two cycling threads on the first page. Surely as a matter of consistency, unionist Div should add a sub-section for the sub-human death merchants ?

Incorrect again. A chain joins together and attaches onto the bike therefore it absolutely hinges. Mate, your having a mare on here again and yet again like most cyclists you resort to personal abuse like 'Retard'. My advice goes beyond cycling, you need to calm down and stop being to aggressive and personal. I've choose not to report your offensive words but please change your ways and your cycling manner. Or you will be dead.

A chain can attach or join and therefore can hinge, and I hope yours falls off tomorrow on your daily death ride. HTH.

Please stop defending the indefensible and making light of serious violations. I hope your chain unhinges.