Couldn't agree more everyone has a right to criticise the bad stuff & praise the good even when its the same player doing both.
Everyone can have a go at the manager even call for him to resign if they are sick and tired of the negative play, the set-up not to lose until we go a goal down then start to attack, the 75 mins of slow build up only to panic in last 15 or when a goal down, the refusal to play our best goalscorer as a centre forward (winger or leave on bench) in favpour of two guys not quite cutting it.
Could you imagine the 'abuse' previous managers would have got if they left Coyle/Ryan out the team or played them as wingers.
I was one who was willing to get behind this team & manager but something is not right & that lays squarely with the managerwho a quarter of the season in still doesn't know what his best team is.
I get that projects like this take time but you also expect to see continued improvement not a steady decline, if I had this sort of pattern of results in my workplace I would be revisiting the model & making changes. The most worrying thing for me in the managers decision process is that certain errors are repeated.
IF our DF or Chairman want the happy clapper 200 crowds then good luck with that but I thought they had bigger ambition than that.
However, if they want to reduce crowds further by critising the loyal PAYING fans instead of addressing the core issues then managed decline continues & shame on them.