DanMan

Would be interesting to see if your club hierarchy think it's a joke club, and would perhaps consider refunding the gate money that the joke clubs many fans paid. Be a sizeable refund I would imagine.

A 2-1, a pen shootout and a 3-2.

Where are you pulling this "aging" squad from? Maybe 5 or 6 over 30 out of a squad of 25 ..... You do like to manipulate the truth Mr Rhubarb.

The content on this Forum would imply otherwise.

Hampden is not good for watching football. Behind the goals is miles from the action. Low down dug out side is unwatchable as the subs ets stand in front of you. The camber on the pitch doesn't help low down either side as you cannot see the far touchline. It is a terrible place to watch football.

That will be Inter & AC, Roma & Lazio Fkt then if they ever want to join the WOSFL ...

That makes no sense. Did the Bankies not win 3-0 on your "good" pitch.

So you enjoy teams shooting up and down a hill. Away and give me peace. Good level? Darvel, hardly any rain in the last 2 weeks, but needs a pitch inspection. Glens, a mud heap at the best of times.

How many "well maintained" natural surfaces are there at this level? Apart from Talbot, which is always exceptional, there aren't too many others, especially this deep in the season. So if you are asking would I rather watch my team on a good quality astro, on on the "problem pitch" that is Darvel, or the mountain slope that is Beith, then yes I would rather watch on astro.

One of them

Is it not 4 times in a row in the league?

I think most teams treasurers are delighted when Clydebank roll into town. Still if you don't see that benefit, maybe arrange for Clydebank fans to get into Darvel for free next month.

I don't suppose Clydebank & Yoker operate a dual contract with players either. Maybe, just maybe you shouldn't have laid a pitch that full time clubs couldn't afford, or indeed kitted out the finest changing rooms in Scotland. Especially with a very poor home support, unless of course the Big Teams are in town to boost the coffers.

Away and howl at the moon .......

1. Do St. Cadocs have experience of getting things over the line. 2. Whilst I agree Beith are slight favourites, they have already lost the same number of games this season as Clydebank, so maybe better with points on the board. 3. If you think Talbot deserved to win on Saturday, you must have been in The Lovat at opening time. Although, if Talbot are going to influence the eventual winners, then I am glad we have played them twice already (and beat them twice). 4. Not much of a secret meeting if you know about it.

For what it's worth, my take on this is quite simple. The "powers that be " cannot do anything other than award the game to Glenafton. Somebody earlier in the thread summed it up. A few key players missing with injury/ suspension, turn up with 7, have an injury and abandon the game. Then get a replay when everybody is back. It cannot be allowed to happen. Time for the blazers to show a bit of leadership.

Not being funny, but is Clydebank's responsibilty not to themselves and their fans? Massive game tonight, couldn't change position in the league no matter the outcome. Imaging the outcry from the Bankies fans if they had gone full strength on Saturday and picked up a few injuries. Clydebank over the season gained enough points to allow themselves the right to play whatever team the manager chose.

Can you name 1 decision the ref gave wrong that impacted the game? Red Card was just stupidity from the Darvel player. Other than that, the ref never really had a game changing decision to make. Please feel free to point any out though

Does it not mean though that smaller squads can perhps give key players a break, maybe not having to play through an injury for 20 mins. Might also encourage more u20's to get an opportunity.

As the English Premier League have voted to allow 5 subs next season, with all their sport science, massive medical teams and huge squads, surely it would make sense to have the same in the WOSFL. Boys working all week and maybe having to play 2 or 3 games, no wonder players get injured.

Although given that there are 4 Tier 6 clubs in the last 32, and they have played 10 games v teams higher and not lost one, with 90% played infront of crowds of over 1,000. Are these clubs not being held back by the lack of opportunity and the self preservation of SPFL teams?

I will now go and leave you to discuss how expert you all are and how the real experts have it all wrong... Ps. Are any of your teams actually competing this year ?? If not why are you even bothered... and why have your club allowed players to go on loan elsewhere?? Enjoy the rest of the season, as long as it continues. If/ when the real experts pull the plug then fair enough, while all you "self proclaimed experts" are asking for an end to the season... Forgive me for not listening. Unless any of you can pull a degree in Virology or Public Health out of your pocket....

As it stands the real "experts" are happy to keep football going. However the "experts" on here want it stopped... You tell me who's advice I should take?

Sorry if I interupted your SAGE meeting to comment...

Sorry Mick, I thought all the experts were on here....