PB 4.2

I'm not. I like Thobbz. One of the good guys.

Didn't know you were the carrier.

Deleted the waffle. You will pay your share of road-fuelled taxation if you drive 30,000 miles plus per annum. You would have paid your way. Several times you've suggested cyclists are the richest in society, yet you want them to contribute the least in road taxation. You make IDS appear compassionate.

pull the other one..

So thus far we've established that: 1) Car drivers contribute more in V.E.D. I contribute several thousands of pounds via fuel duties and VAT on petrol to the overall road tax mix. The total road tax receipts in the UK is circa £50 BILLION POUNDS. Cyclists pay nothing. The DVSA turned in a profit of £30 million last year. Cyclists contribute nothing. These roads are ours. We fund them. Either pay up or GTF.

You are awarded zero points and no fuel. Unlucky. Unleaded.

Final answer?

V.E.D is a tiny fraction of overall road tax take.

That's a reasonable response. There is a feeling of stretching and resistance involved when achieving maximum hose length. If its came off its coil, you've broke it. Have you ever broken a petrol pump hose, thobber? Have you ever seen a grown man naked?

The hoses stretch, the pumps remain a constant.

An excellent point. Normal folk pay more transportation tax than bikalists. If your wanting the use our fooking road, here's the 3 point plan: 1. Get a 2nd job. 2. Ditch the fetish gear and buy some trousers with pockets. 3. Put your hand in your pocket and pay for the fuckin roads! ...and have a fuckin' wash. Mink paupers.

Reported for trolling.

I believe he reported @throbber the other day. Sad times when all you have is computer games and annoying the moderators with ridiculous claims.

The forum's drama queen reports me for 'discussing cycling in the cycling thread'. And cycling 250 miles in 5 days deserves absolutely no sponsorship as it requires absolutely no effort level. Pretty much any adult can cycle 125 miles a day so you should be completing that in 2 days max.

I am about to pluralise it, and just to be a bit gallus, I am going to pour a large nip of a yet to be determined single malt to accompany it. Yer a wee rascal. Quiet one for me as I need to be tiptop for tomorrows surveying.

I like several of them. I find Heverlee and Heverlee go together in perfect harmony.

Just ordered myself a 400mm shower head.

The new Hula Hoop puffs are surprisingly magnificent! Tastes like monster munch/wotsits.

Once again you actions validate our decisions. Our survey's cost nothing more than the price of a clipboard and a breakfast roll. Online platforms attract 'overheads & dickheads'. I had hoped you'd have welcomed the news we're surveying; instead you've reached near aneurysm levels of rage, and have been dealing with your problems using denial and whataboutery. We will never act in a kowtowing manner, but frankly we can't be arsed with the reactions of folk like yourself (and you're only a cat 3) and others who wish to suppress frèe speech and abhor road safety. That's why we're predominantly offline. We won't be naming the towns we're data collecting in this year to reduce the risk to a verbal/physical alteration and hospitalization.

Incorrect. It's a KIA Pro-ceed.

Sadly for you, I don't take follow up questions from aggressive cyclists ( in your case a Cat. 3) who's sole intention is to hijack and distort our 2018 Survey results, But, tbh, I didn't think you were capable of such a dreadful response. You've typed that purely to gainsay the validity of my organisation's study, and to present the whiff of superiority which Glaswegians are getting pillared from in another thread. The C.A.S.T team may strive for NGO or charity Status. Perhaps then we'll employ one of the BPC big 6 to carry out our research. In the interim we are a team consisting of only 20-25 ( or if you prefer a pack of cuntin Cyclists delaying traffic for normal folk). As previously stated to you, all our additional funding will be used for advertising and to fund anyone who wishes to make a criminal complaint against a cyclist ( like the case where UTN admitted he verbally abused a normal person). Terms like Qualitative, Quantitative methods brings me back to my uni days. Believe I did modules on both. Absolutely no idea who the Greek sounding chap is but I won't google. TBH I wouldn't take on the whiff of superiority if: 1) I was employed ( snigger) 2) I owned a bike ( snigger) 3) I was asked to carry out a survey on fatigue management ( snigger) 4) I gave my bikes pet names ( snigger) Still. Can't wait for the Leslie bike sale! Should be a cracker!

No. Quite the opposite is true. We survey random members of the public and weigh by housing status to ensure cyclists are appropriately represented. The very reason you cannot be privy to our survey dates and location is to preserve the accuracy it's returns. Plus we can't be arsed with vigilante groups - with a track record for mindless thuggery - disrupting our work. As always we'll publish finding on here when the data has been returned, weighted and analysed.

IIRC Father Dougal McGuire tried to give up the demon Rollerskates for Lent. Perhaps you should repentance by handing in your pedals for Lent? Raise funds for some awful charity like 'Help the aged' and lower your blood pressure. Datasets won't be available for category 3 & 5 offenders. The integrity of the survey is sacrosanct.

Telling that the cycling community are happy to turn a blind eye to such outrageous criminality. Behaviour that's unfortunately consistent with previous cases where denial, and false accusations become popular methods when defending the criminal acts of cyclists. The C.A.S.T team have been distributing our 2018 Big Cycling Attitutes Surveys. End of the month until we have full results to share.

He's cycling along a pavement illegally and very nearly causes the death of the hard-working mechanic. It's always black and white with you cycling types and I don't mean in a racist way. Although you might well be racist OBAG. Are you a racist?