Jump to content

1985

Gold Members
  • Posts

    131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 1985

  1. I don’t think my concerns will make a difference or my £6 - I must be watching different games from committee - however no committee - no welfare - Wee Andrew a massive loss but I believe he still advising- personally think they’re all a loss to the club
  2. NB your in the kno..... why , when we had hardly picked up a point and players were leaving pretty quick .... why were the given the job permanent - ?? And why have at least 4 of the committee walked since last year? Genuine question
  3. Your right but the comments are from people that are generally concerned for the club. WW were never a big club , they have always been a well respected club that could attract good players and managers , the concern seems to be that we are in danger of losing this
  4. Young players are coached from a very young age now to try and play the game properly- nowadays you can’t get away with bullying opponents and kicking them up and down the park - when the boy S Thompson came in as a coach I thought it was a good move for the young lads but it looks like he’s a yes man to the manager with no input at all , the manager needs to get in touch with the modern game which I doubt will ever happen, the club need to open their eyes and do something positive before we end up playing in the lowest of the leagues. We be moved managers on for less
  5. Spot on , worry for me is that it looks like they could be there for a long time yet, no doing a great job for the clubs reputation with so many leaving and it seems being backed by the powers that be .
  6. Apparently doesn’t fit in to the managers style of football-
  7. And if he’s not been paid?? Got to be managers is it not??
  8. As far as I’m led to believe no fee was paid by WW as some kind of deal was struck with Penicuik that if they wanted him back he could go for nothing - not sure about this , heard at the time . Poor show by WW tbh - anyone know of the other guys ie Andy Fleming , Ryan Gay were simply released or they looking for £££ there as well- if they’ve had nothing out the club and didn’t cost them anything they should let them go - young boys that are clearly not in the managers plans
  9. Because they’d rather put a 19 year old laddie that’s no in their plans out the game or try and get some £££ - no manager gonna pay for a player who can’t hold down a place in that team -
  10. Definitely but will never be able to adjust to whatever style of play landells wants them to play- same goes for Ally Smith who will be next
  11. Reading that Alan ‘windy’ Miller ha taken the craigroyston job
  12. Unfortunately I think you may be right. My worry is the damage between now and the end of the season . Need to be taking advantage of playing against a man down but they seem incapable of changing things. If we could have stayed within touching distance of the teams above we’d have given ourselves a chance of staying up as we have a decent last 6 or 7 games in the run in . WW will still be an attractive job to some
  13. The management have got a struggle because their out their depth - simple
  14. Aye maybe your right - get rid of the players and keep the manager
  15. I said in an earlier post that the majority are 20 and under. Surely if your the manager it’s your responsibility to recruit some decent experience . Leaderless , clueless . Prob be another new face from their old club this week . There are decent young players there but they’re no gonna survive
  16. I’m with YHD on the management should not be anywhere near WW. No coaching skills , no communication , no contacts - no clue !!!
  17. I think we’ve got some decent young lads there who would only get better with decent experienced players and some decent coaching , but my fear is they’ll have gone before they decide to get a decent management team in -
  18. Failed to capitalise against 10 men today . Vale no that good and there for the taking . Second time this season that happened . Only my opinion but I think we’re getting worse , unfit looking .
  19. Heard another E x Aniston midfielder training as well , don't think it's a keeper we need tbh
  20. I personally think changes should be looked at ASAP - or you'll find the you might lose some of them - maybe missed the boat for a good appointment but surely WW is still an attractive job .you'll never know till you advertise
  21. Totally agree but that was 3 months ago , plenty time to replace them - but we still going down the road of 19/20 year olds- that won't save them- the young lads are all decent with the right guys round about them but their all relatively new to "mens" game and can't be expected to get them away from the bottom of the league without some experience- only my opinion again but I very much doubt if the management team have the contacts - every time a new player comes he's under 20
  22. Are Lucas and McIntosh any better? If you read the post it says "good" experienced players needed
  23. My opinion is that we are asking a group of boys mostly 20 and under to take part in a relegation dog fight, we have no decent experience in the squad to help develop these guys Jardine, Dowie, Reid, Fleming, smith, Somerville, Mitchell, Malloy and mckenzie are all 20 and under !! Add to that the 18 year old on loan from Livvy!! Oreilly, manson,Gay and Kerr all walked and Dodds got a bad injury , some good experienced players required very quick
  24. Defence a lot tighter. There’s strikers out there with goals in them. We let a couple go , The boy Knox and Barrett from last years 20 and the lad McCraw who got a bad injury last year . Looks like Yano could land the Bonnyrigg job -
×
×
  • Create New...