Kuro

I also find it bizarre, wilfully ignorant and counter productive to not just dismiss but refuse to even consider someone's professional views on an entirely separate platform because they use colourful language on Twitter that wrongly leads you to conclude (though inevitably you only even 'know' this second hand as you don't read them) that they are a bigot. I have invited you twice to dissect and refute any one of his hundreds of articles eating back seven years, you have failed to do so. What you can't see here is it's really you who shouldn't be taken seriously.

You'll need to provide evidence of 1- transphobia, and 2- that it's necessary to agree with every other indy supporter. I don't think I've ever heard anyone say that. What I find amazing is someone like you, it's so common, clearly have a high opinion of yourself, probably think you are a paragon of intellectual rigour, yet you literally make stuff up out of thin air to.support your views, then when asked to are incapable of backing up your statements. That's just lying, that's all that is. So evidence please...

https://medium.com/@glinner/one-week-in-the-war-on-women-bc070591198a

I think you've lead a very sheltered life if you think there's been any abuse here, and it's simply naive to.think.all discourse should be what you perceive as civil. Some people are wankers, that's just the way it is, it's not unreasonable to call a spade a spade. You, for example.

I'm repeating what actual rape victims have said and you are dismissing it from a position of ignorance. I suggest you read wings article above to understand why organisations have been intimidated into toeing the line, when in fact separate spaces can easily be created for trans women as they now are beginning to be in prisons.

But many do, so if you know better what rape victims are comfortable with in the aftermath of being raped than actual rape victims do knock yourself out. Astonishing arrogance. On wings timeline just today is a rape victim saying she would only be comfortable with a female conducting an intimate examination and being labelled transphobic for saying so. People like you facilitate this.

Exactly, and actual women in the most vulnerable moments of their entire lives are objecting to this and complaining about it, and being labelled tranephobic for doing so. This is exactly the sort of thing WoS is also objecting to, as it's clearly wrong. Here is the crux of his views https://wingsoverscotland.com/the-law-that-nobody-wants/

I couldn't give the slightest fk and am not qualified to say what somebody actually is post op. Like wings, I don't care what people choose to call themselves or live as. I know identifying as female doesn't change biology though. I also know you have not followed this debate which has been going on for years, in which wings has such transphobic supporters as Sharon Davies and martina navratilova, and have lifted a single quote entirely out of context with which to misrepresent his views.

All four of them are actually Tory representatives not just two.

That's not transphobic. He is not and never has objected to anyone identifying as female, the point is identifying as female doesn't mean you actually ARE female and therefore allowed to invade female only spaces like sports, toilets, changing roos, rape crisis centres and professions. You are lifting a quote entirely out of context and misrepresenting it, trans women are men who identity as women, that's not the same as just being a woman, that's why the prefix 'trans' is required. If you believe that's transphobic report it see how you get on, the last person failed and only avoided damages cause she was deemed too stupid to know her allegation was untrue.

Or England

Can you provide a single transphobic quote from him?

Sure you did. Would you like to provide even one shred of evidence of said homophobia or transphobia? I don't think you know what abuse is tbh, but you sure know what concern trolling is.

Awesome. I'm sure your protests are very effective. More power to you.

This is how normal people speak. Wings is a normal person, as am I. You are a fanny. As for your 'refutations' one concerns a post not contained in any of his articles already ruled by a judge not homophobic,the other may well turn out to be correct. He predicted trump, brexit and Tory majority. Nobody else did. Politically he's the best mind the UK has seen for a long time. He's literally always bang on, forensically researched and very well written. He also shows his working. You are an ignorant fool.

Shocker that sanctimonious wanksocket when asked to back up his views fails to do so. And you didn't challenge me in the slightest, you talked shite and I pointed out it was shite. You have years worth of articles numbering in the hundreds, you can't refute even one. A judge ruled his remarks categorically not homophobic btw, unlucky.

Evidence then....

You genuinely believe its coincidence Tory activists, volunteers, candidates and representatives keep getting in the audience and asked to comment?

You're an idiot.

Moray voted remain and support for remain is over 60%, support for the SNP is 40%. Even right in front of you you still deny reality.

Wilfully ignorant or lying. This is a subversion of democracy and would be a major news story if we actually lived in a democracy.

Do they? Let's see some evidence please.

On the big issues you wouldn't expect to see that at all. If you don't support brexit for example, you should be resigning from a party that supports it if you have any principles.

Fanny talk.

You're being a fanny is what you're doing. As I said, refute one of wings articles, any one you want, there's hundreds. You won't be able to and we both know that.