Burnieman

They have already applied to the EoS.

If Harthill want to press on with an application for WoS then they do have a case, but now that they can't encourage anyone to join them as a comfort blanket perhaps they won't pursue it.

Bathgate release statement saying they have applied to the EoS [emoji106]

Well done to both leagues for applying common sense.

Common sense prevails, well done to the officials of both leagues.

https://www.fifetoday.co.uk/sport/football/east-of-scotland-season-looks-to-be-over-says-dundonald-bluebells-general-manager-3158406

UK now around 60/100k over 7 days, Scotland now behind that average on 64/100k

You're posting articles you haven't read and then using them as evidence to hold the SG to account. Are you serious? I want to read the article so I know what it says before coming to any conclusion. Maybe you should do the same.

It levelled off at 800 for a couple of weeks before schools went back.

Wednesday - 500, Thursday - 498, Friday 555, so todays numbers consistent with that.

Whit?

You didn't read the article you have posted above, yet you think some may "choke on it". How can you conclude that if you have no idea what the article actually said?

We won't.

So you haven't actually read the full Times article on on-field transmission to understand context, but you're happy to post it here, there and everywhere claiming it proves it's safe to restart fitba, along with your usual sly dig at the SG. Glad that's cleared up.

Aren't you trying to do that by posting that Times article on half a dozen non league threads? Have you read the full article as I'd like to read the whole thing and not a headline, can you post it? Does it differentiate between full time professional football/sport that regularly tests, to part time amateur sport that doesn't?

Did they consider football matches where no testing at all is taking place? Can you post up the full article please as it is behind a paywall.

I've not read the article as it is behind a paywall, but surely the story here is that pre-match testing of players prevents spread on the pitch, do they cover those matches where no testing was taking place at all?

If they all test negative pre-match, then the risk of on pitch transmission is surely negligible due to that, isn't that the point of testing? The article is behind a paywall, but did their research include matches where neither team were tested?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/07/dutch-clubbers-dance-study-easing-lockdown-music-event-coronavirus?utm_term=Autofeed&CMP=twt_gu&utm_medium&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1615133737

I'm guessing that when NS announces some relaxations over the next week or so allowing 4 people from 2 different households to meet outside on a park bench, everyone bursts out laughing?

UEFA won't give a shit.

No leagues below the SPFL can play at the moment.

Yip keep things tight throughout March, relax a wee bit upto 15th April when all 1-9 groups done and then you may even see pubs open by election day.

Nobody in politics is above criticism for their actions, but it is plainly obvious you have an agenda and will squeeze it into every post you make. Maybe ease up a wee bit.

It's probably just you dragging party politics into every single post you make on here these days, is there an election coming up, or am I just being cynical....