DMCs

Why the f**k is no one there Could basically confirm the title today and they aren't even there. Some finish anyway!

b*****d that's annoying. You might have a chance. I'd be looking at alternatives though as supposedly our allocation has been reduced to 9.5k due to segregation seats.

For the threshold for the 2nd stage? Or the 1st?

Some picture

Europa League Final on the Wednesday Back in Scotland on the Friday Scottish Cup Final the day after Away to the Amalfi Coast on the Tuesday Going to be a ridiculous few weeks but not exactly kind on the bank account.

the f**k

I didn't realise how much of a sitter Aribo's chance was. Open goal basically!

Ganz Deutschland erobert with that scenario

What a night! John Lundstram is the best on earth

No one. It bumps up some other teams in CL qualifiers. So teams from Serbia or Austria or whatever have slightly easier qualification paths for the CL.

Diouf was pretty pish to be honest. Only his goal against Sporting Lisbon really stands out. People just look back on that more fondly as we won the league and league cup in the end.

No, it's 3 cards for a booking. Only if someone gets a red can they be suspended.

They were volunteers just like the people in your article are volunteers. Many of them from neighbouring countries like Belarus and even Russia. Nothing to do with "contractors".

"Private military contractors" Guess the Abraham Lincoln brigade were just foreign mercs too then...

No, makes no difference.

Thomson's not a wind-up merchant though.

Poor comparison with Hartson I'd say. He gets too fuming he's incapable of even basic wind up like Boyd is. I'd agree Sutton is smarter than Boyd.

It certainly works a lot anyway. Celtic fans seem unable to not bite at his comments as evidenced by this thread. He's our version of Sutton now. Give me the Petrovs and McCoists over these kind of pundits.

I feel like I'm going insane. The nervous anticipation is too much

And what are those figures relative to their respective opponents of the time? That's the real question rather than the raw numbers.

It doesn't matter how many grannies they have but how many fighting capable men they have. The age split of the population is very different from in 1850. Not to mention that the Ukrainians have a morale advantage. Their young people are much more desperate to fight in their defensive war than Russians are happy to invade Ukraine. From what I've read Transnistra could barely put up a day's fight. The army Russia has there isn't serious in the slightest. It's basically a drunk holiday destination for Russian soldiers. They have no serious equipment.

That makes sense, but it didn't stop them in Crimea (back in 18whateveritwas). They chucked half a million soon to be dead bodies at it despite being technologically inferior and got skelped. Vastly different demographic situation. Russia is now a much older country and has less young men to chuck at it. Plus it's generally the young Russians living in major cities that are most opposed to the war. Which is why their current invasion force has more ethnic minorities and folk from the economically struggling peripheries as they have less economic options and they tend to be younger than the population at large.

The quality of those teams varies so much it's ridiculous. A 2 legged tie against TNS to reach the Europa League would have you laughing.

I don't think there is a hope in hell that Russia genuinely mobilises. It would be a political disaster for them and would be no guarantee of a victory at all considering how much time it would take to get the men to the front lines.

Some weirdos getting themselves in a right state.