Big Dougie

There was no vote to end the season, the season was ended working within the rules of the league. If Tier 5 teams had been given a fair and equal amount of money in line with Div2 then maybe they could have “burst their arse” to get it completed.

Yes you are correct, but looking in from the outside the reverse happened from this year. There was no chance of promotion last year, so it probably wasn’t right to relegate either. I am all for there being relegation this year if Kelty have a chance at the other end.

That was done to accommodate Bo’ness and to honour their part of the pyramid, despite no play off at the top.

It wasn’t a rule

I would say that the top 5 tier 5 sides are certainly equal to the bottom 5 League 2 sides.

Agreed, sounds like a cop out. Genuine question, do any of the teams actually want promotion out of the league?

Also makes sense to give themselves a bit of extra time incase of anymore stoppages during the season.

Why don’t you check for yourself. Instead of peddling your conspiracy theories on here.

Why don’t you ask him then, his contact details are readily available?

I think the board referred to is the SFA board.

Fair comment. Personally I’m not sure if it would go that far, but you just never know.

I don’t think anyone mentioned taking the SPFL to court??

Not a clue, carry on trolling.

You can’t use common sense with him Jerry. I posted the relevant rule and he has ignored that, he will not engage with anything that doesn’t suit his agenda.I suspect he is deliberately trolling, and is best ignored.

So why ask what circumstances changed??

Here is the rule which counts - E5 The Board shall have the power to temporarily suspend, amend or add to the rules as circumstances may dictate from time to time, as it deems appropriate in its reasonable discretion, to facilitate the smooth running of the competition, or in order to ensure the League is capable of meeting any commitments put upon it under the terms of any contracts or agreements with other bodies or sponsors. Edit - I see Bonnyrigg have included this rule in their statement just issued.

I’m not “In the know” but you have missed the various pieces where it has been stated that the SFA informed the league last Tuesday that null and void would not be acceptable for the purposes of putting a champion club forward, and only PPG would allow them to take part in the playoffs. Robbie Horn mentioned on Friday among many others.

Nobody can surpass the charlatans at the SPFL when it comes to lack of sporting integrity, and that goes for some of their clubs as well.

You have been asking for days, and you were given an answer the last time! What do you not understand about the circumstances changing after discussions with the SFA, it’s not difficult to understand.

Can you advise where you get your tinfoil hats from?

You really have a bee in your bonnet about this don’t you? It has been made clear that the goalposts were moved last week by the SFA, leading to a decision based on that information.

The EoSFL and SoSFL haven’t declared anything as far as I am aware, unless you know something?

The SFA most likely. You can’t use a rule at one end of the table and not be consistent and use it at the other end as well.

Oh piss off