bkay Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Smackdown Elimination Chamber participants; Daniel Bryan, Cody Rhodes, Randy Orton, Wade Barrett, Big Show and The Great Khali. The last two are fucking awful 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Patterson Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I'm sure he's been growing it for a while now, and he's got two whole months to continue said growth! I just hope he won't cut it short like when he turned heel when he was still in the American Badass gimmick. It's still gonna be pretty short in comparison to what it was. It was only a few months back that he was seen with a shaved head and plus his hairline has been clearly receding for a few years now. Surely they'll need to work something into the storyline so that he ends up with short hair/bald as Taker surely wouldn't wrestle in a wig . I thought after seeing those photos that he'd return with the short hair in an updated incarnation. The wig looks bloody stupid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulo Sergio Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Smackdown Elimination Chamber participants; Daniel Bryan, Cody Rhodes, Randy Orton, Wade Barrett, Big Show and The Great Khali. The last two are fucking awful Khali. Dreadful. When was he last even about, anyway? -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#Gary Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Khali. Dreadful. When was he last even about, anyway? At the Royal Rumble. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkay Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Khali. Dreadful. When was he last even about, anyway? Exactly. Could have flung say Justin Gabriel just for some high spots in the match 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 (edited) Aye. Gabriel. Okay. Edited February 1, 2012 by DomDom 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bkay Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Aye. Gabriel. Okay. Don't why I had him on my head think because of Rhodes. He is better thank Khali anyway 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big River Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I'm assuming Khali is only in there because Henry is injured then? Either way its a dreadful inclusion. Big Show may be awful but at least it makes sense for him to be in it because he's been in and around the title picture. Khali is nothing but a massive jobber. Should have either brought Christian back or stuck Ezekiel Jackson in there. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
forehead7 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Dreadful. When was he last even about, anyway? You see the spoiler bar thing? Yeah, it's there for a reason, f**k stick. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Don't why I had him on my head think because of Rhodes. He is better thank Khali anyway Rhodes would have been a good inclusion. The only reason I can think of for leaving him out would be to have him defend the IC title. Big Show may be awful but at least it makes sense for him to be in it because he's been in and around the title picture. Indeed, and he's been good for the last 12 months anyways. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 To be fair forehead, this sort of spoiler could probably be seen as a public service? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginge123 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I wish I had the will power to ignore the Internet for even a day. I would have loved that 'Taker return if I hadn't went on ewrestlingnews.com. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DomDom Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 I didn't realise people were even reporting that before it happened. I had forgotten about The Undertaker.Anyways, we relaxed the rules of Smackdown spoilers in here the minute we had an actual match spoiler posted with no complaints. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#Gary Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Chyna's having a mental breakdown on Twitter and levelling all sorts of insults at WWE and Vince McMahon. She's also an illiterate fckwit, unsurprisingly. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Since it's already been discussed without spoilers.....Khali? Fucking hell. Had they booked him even relatively correctly in the last 6 weeks, they could have even stuck McIntyre in. He was brilliant in the chamber last year (or was it 2 years ago?) I thought it was the start of a push for McIntyre, now I think he's paying the price for having a fucking nutjob of a wife (ex-wife?) who made him look stupid by assaulting him, much like Morrison and Melina situation, but with less shagging of Mike Knox involved. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginge123 Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 If Khali wins, I'm completely done with WWE. I'm sure he won't but you never know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marshmallo Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Drew McIntyre is shite. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 The sudden return and push of Khali is very strange. Could it be due to Ring Ka King being well recieved in India? I'm sure TNA would have been very keen to sign him up for that once he'd sat out his WWE contract. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big River Posted February 1, 2012 Share Posted February 1, 2012 Rhodes would have been a good inclusion. The only reason I can think of for leaving him out would be to have him defend the IC title. Rhodes is in the chamber match. He won't win it, but I think he will be made to look pretty strong, adding to his impressive showing in the rumble. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paulo Sergio Posted February 2, 2012 Share Posted February 2, 2012 At the Royal Rumble. Really? I fell asleep for the first half hour or so of the Rumble match itself, it must have been then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.