The Master Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 The meeting has already past if you believe some of liars and wind-up merchants on this thread. Passed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 So you gave up your career in the grammar police to get into the spelling business? Any better pay? That's a rookie error, I'll say that much. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 The meeting has already past if you believe some of liars and wind-up merchants on this thread. Oh I dunno, I don't have you actually quoted on it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 The meeting has already past if you believe some of liars and wind-up merchants on this thread. On a more serious note... what if no punishment is ever meted out? If Berwick play an ineligible player - and get a points deduction, a fine and the player a ban - can we just decide not to play our next game until appeal process ends (or until such time as we feel satisfied, which is what Livi did)? Does ignoring this not tacitly set a dangerous precedent? I realise the SFL just want the whole debacle to go away, but doing nothing isn't an acceptable policy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 Two different kettles of fish. I don't really think you can set a precedent for your situation by rightfully giving us no punishment. Then again, you didn't care about setting dangerous precedents when we were demoted 2 divisions. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marty_j Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 I'm not convinced it is done and dusted yet. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantoms-livi-lass Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I'm not convinced it is done and dusted yet. I'm not either, & won't be until some kind of statement is issued, but it seems we are all being kept in the dark about this. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OTIG_FTOF Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Thursday 17th December, SFL will have a meeting and announce their Chritmas present to Liviscum - 20 point penalty, £10k fine, and order to pay ES £5k compo for lost revenue etc. Job done 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Then again, you didn't care about setting dangerous precedents when we were demoted 2 divisions. Go on, make my day - in what way is that precedent 'dangerous'? Feel free to consult a dictionary for the definition of 'dangerous' if you feel the need. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Go on, make my day - in what way is that precedent 'dangerous'? Feel free to consult a dictionary for the definition of 'dangerous' if you feel the need. In the same way that Hibee Jibee's example was. It's called using repetition for effect. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AND180Y Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 You gotta laugh, £2500 to hire the pitch at the West Lothian Community Charitable Stadium for a junior match. Reason for extortionate rate; "we need to make money". I wonder if Bathgate Thistle charged them the same rate? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 "West Lothian Charitable Community Stadium"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vikingTON Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 In the same way that Hibee Jibee's example was. It's called using repetition for effect. Um no, because by punishing the administration the disincentive is made clear by precedent (one that had already ben set in the case of Gretna) whereas by not punishing the fixture scratch, the previous disincentive is, apparently, null and void. It's completely the opposite effect. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I meant using the word 'dangerous' before the word precedent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Then again, you didn't care about setting dangerous precedents when we were demoted 2 divisions. That was not a precedent, because it was a punishment that had already been handed out to Gretna. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdinburghLivi Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Are you trying to be vikingTON's sniveling sidekick? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phantoms-livi-lass Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 That was not a precedent, because it was a punishment that had already been handed out to Gretna. Not the same set of circumstances in the Gretna case though, it was a different reason for relegation to third. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Master Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Not the same set of circumstances in the Gretna case though, it was a different reason for relegation to third. Not really. Gretna's relegation was brought on by financial irregularities; your relegation was brought on by financial irregularities. As my good friend Aleksandr would say: "simples". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimbo Posted November 2, 2009 Share Posted November 2, 2009 Not really.Gretna's relegation was brought on by financial irregularities; your relegation was brought on by financial irregularities. As my good friend Aleksandr would say: "simples". Gretna went to the third division because their ground was not fit for first division football. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.