Jump to content

Livingston - all the threads merged


Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, EdinburghLivi said:

The statement in the accounts suggests they were on target to break even last season. 3rd section circled. 

Did you actually read that highlighted section? How has your club delivered on those back on a fag packet provisos in the 12 months since? 

You can set pretty much any target for breaking even - the hard part is actually doing it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit unclear on the figures as the financial reports are ass as Kieran Maguire says. 

£1.6m of the profit and loss negative reserve were there while Hogarth was involved (the figure was -£2.85m in 2018 so very similar to now so £3m being quoted as losses under Ward is either being intentionally misleading or misunderstanding the figure.

The key figures that concern me are the £462k loss and the £1m in net liabilities which of course includes the £1.6m due to Scottish Government. While we had £900k in the bank, I'm annoyed that is going towards court cases (including the seemingly frivolous pursuit of Hogarth for fraud) rather than paying that debt off at the earliest opportunity/putting money towards the playing budget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, virginton said:

Did you actually read that highlighted section? How has your club delivered on those back on a fag packet provisos in the 12 months since? 

You can set pretty much any target for breaking even - the hard part is actually doing it. 

You're right that they can set any target. It's the last line that suggests they are "confident that this break even position will be delivered or improved upon supported by performance to date" which I took to mean performance in FY 2024 YTD. They will have been putting these accounts together roughly around March this year which will have come after two away quarter finals to the old firm. The statement suggests to me that they are anticipating a profit for FYE June 2024, presumably attributable to those unexpected cash boosts.

Edited by EdinburghLivi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EdinburghLivi said:

I'm a bit unclear on the figures as the financial reports are ass as Kieran Maguire says. 

One of the three key assumptions for your target involved the club's final league position in the SPFL [sic] in 23/24 - which is now known. 

Another was transfer revenue generated, for which a general outcome (a lot; some; hee-haw) can also be derived. 

When those key assumptions underpin the break-even target in your account statement, I think it would be safe to conclude that last season's performance did not actually meet the target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, EdinburghLivi said:

I'm a bit unclear on the figures as the financial reports are ass as Kieran Maguire says. 

£1.6m of the profit and loss negative reserve were there while Hogarth was involved (the figure was -£2.85m in 2018 so very similar to now so £3m being quoted as losses under Ward is either being intentionally misleading or misunderstanding the figure.

The key figures that concern me are the £462k loss and the £1m in net liabilities which of course includes the £1.6m due to Scottish Government. While we had £900k in the bank, I'm annoyed that is going towards court cases (including the seemingly frivolous pursuit of Hogarth for fraud) rather than paying that debt off at the earliest opportunity/putting money towards the playing budget.

Is the 1.6mil the COVID loan,   geez,   League 1 clubs had to get by on 150k from Scot Gov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, EdinburghLivi said:

I'm a bit unclear on the figures as the financial reports are ass as Kieran Maguire says. 

£1.6m of the profit and loss negative reserve were there while Hogarth was involved (the figure was -£2.85m in 2018 so very similar to now so £3m being quoted as losses under Ward is either being intentionally misleading or misunderstanding the figure.

The key figures that concern me are the £462k loss and the £1m in net liabilities which of course includes the £1.6m due to Scottish Government. While we had £900k in the bank, I'm annoyed that is going towards court cases (including the seemingly frivolous pursuit of Hogarth for fraud) rather than paying that debt off at the earliest opportunity/putting money towards the playing budget.

I think without seeing the full breakdown of profit and loss its hard to get the full statement.

My take is there is a fine line being taken on where the club is solvent or not. I am sure note 1.2 was used the previous year also.

It was stated we have a top 4 budget this year but can we really afford that ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, EdinburghLivi said:

You're right that they can set any target. It's the last line that suggests they are "confident that this break even position will be delivered or improved upon supported by performance to date" which I took to mean performance in FY 2024 YTD. They will have been putting these accounts together roughly around March this year which will have come after two away quarter finals to the old firm. The statement suggests to me that they are anticipating a profit for FYE June 2024, presumably attributable of those unexpected cash boosts.

Why would they be aware of this handy guarantee of going concern status in March this year - while also being fully aware about your league position - but mention the latter as the key condition for break-even but not the former? 

What you claim simply does not square with your club's published financial statement. 

Edited by vikingTON
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Livi said:

I think without seeing the full breakdown of profit and loss its hard to get the full statement.

 

At a time of the club’s relegation, with the only known job cut seeming to be the mandatory GK coach… would be transparent of the club to show how much is being spent on salaries.
 

 

3 minutes ago, Livi said:

It was stated we have a top 4 budget this year but can we really afford that ? 

Not if Ward keeps using the club as a piggy bank to fight court cases that he should be paying for himself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, CharlieWhisky said:

If the losses for 23/24 were projected as £800k and you add £500k court costs.. well I feel faint. At least we won’t find out until next June.

Now for the optimism: we beat a bunch of part timers from the nowhere leagues last night!

In a meaningless pre season friendly that only happened because of Martindale and Scott Pittmans previous connection with Broxburn.Get real FFC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Roger the cabin boy said:

At a time of the club’s relegation, with the only known job cut seeming to be the mandatory GK coach… would be transparent of the club to show how much is being spent on salaries.
 

 

Not if Ward keeps using the club as a piggy bank to fight court cases that he should be paying for himself. 

Notice in last year the staff count has increased by 7. 

If playing department has about 35 ish people then that leaves 42 people. Stewards and turnstile staff wont be part of that number then that seems a-lot of people when the mantra is we have lots of volunteers? 
 

I wonder how much of the losses accounts for the team bus that also needed a nee engine? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Troy.1995 said:

In a meaningless pre season friendly that only happened because of Martindale and Scott Pittmans previous connection with Broxburn.Get real FFC.

Compared to what’s going on behind the scenes, the happenings on-pitch are a fucking sideshow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Livi said:

Notice in last year the staff count has increased by 7. 

If playing department has about 35 ish people then that leaves 42 people. Stewards and turnstile staff wont be part of that number then that seems a-lot of people when the mantra is we have lots of volunteers? 
 

I wonder how much of the losses accounts for the team bus that also needed a nee engine? 

The playing department will be considerably more than 35. Apart from the squad there's also the coaching staff which seem to number ten according to the official site. Added to this there is the Woman's team and Academy. Some of these are manned by part time or volunteers but presumably the numbers are relevant.

In addition didn't the Woman's team get promoted last season; presumably that meant that the coaching team increased? I seem to remember the they also had a change of team coach as well.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Durnford said:

The playing department will be considerably more than 35. Apart from the squad there's also the coaching staff which seem to number ten according to the official site. Added to this there is the Woman's team and Academy. Some of these are manned by part time or volunteers but presumably the numbers are relevant.

In addition didn't the Woman's team get promoted last season; presumably that meant that the coaching team increased? I seem to remember the they also had a change of team coach as well.

 

you been hiding recently? Missed your chat 😀
 

Volunteers are not staff members. I think this is just the mens team otherwise the staff numbers as you indicate would suggest a deeper under inflation of staff members.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Durnford said:

In addition didn't the Woman's team get promoted last season; presumably that meant that the coaching team increased? I seem to remember the they also had a change of team coach as well

Woman’s team should be heavily subsidised by either the government, SFA, UEFA etc, or all of the above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Livi said:

you been hiding recently? Missed your chat 😀
 

Volunteers are not staff members. I think this is just the mens team otherwise the staff numbers as you indicate would suggest a deeper under inflation of staff members.  

Think you'll be seeing a number of us returning now the Euros are effectively over (for us anyway).

The woman's team are part time employees aren't they?  I suspect the same goes for the coaching team although I think you're correct about the academy being staffed by volunteers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...