Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

This is what the desperate diddies would like to think but the ownership of Rangers/assets isn't in dispute here. As I've said before, it's not a case about buying a stolen car it's a case about stealing money to buy a car.

As far Chuckles and his legal fees? The diddies getting it wrong again is no surprise.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/fraud_act/

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/a_to_c/corporate_prosecutions/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stoney thinking that random links* legitimises the diddies' ignorance.

*Aye, I know.

If you know, why post this shite?

Sevco was created for the sole purpose of owning the assets formerly owned by Rangers. Sevco's controlling minds are now in the dock.

If the court finds that those persons were guilty of fraud then Rangers will get their stuff back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would they not?

 

I'm assuming the argument is that, if I steal a thousand quid and use it to buy a new laptop, it's the person who I stole the money from that gets the money back, not the guy that sold me the laptop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...