Shades75 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Selling club? Rangers can't pay yesterday, Warburton is missing the day before, donated all his kids birthday money to Phil ^^^ You're a worry. By all means celebrate paying a bill. We all know that there's cause for it. But can you please keep your fairy stories to yourself? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Entered? Has the sense of a beginning about it. 'Re-entered at' would have confirmed continuity. Why would those who insist that they are very, really - we promise, secure require such confirmation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Entered? Has the sense of a beginning about it. 'Re-entered at' would have confirmed continuity. That would have suggested that we'd been in the fourth tier before, a straight move from top to bottom according to our friends at Uefa. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Resolution 12 is absolutely tragic, what a waste of energy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shades75 Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 That would have suggested that we'd been in the fourth tier before, a straight move from top to bottom according to our friends at Uefa. Where does it say that? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 That would have suggested that we'd been in the fourth tier before, a straight move from top to bottom according to our friends at Uefa. No it wouldn't, you illiterate tumshie. You're right to say that 're-entered the fourth tier' would suggest they'd been at that level before but 're-entered at the fourth tier' would have suggested re-entering a league structure they had graced before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Why would those who insist that they are very, really - we promise, secure require such confirmation? Ran that through Google translator but I'm still none the wiser. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Resolution 12 is absolutely tragic, what a waste of energy. £8k on two car crash adverts, thousands more apparently spent on research and lobbying. One Celtic fan threatening to go to the polis because he thinks he was conned out of a grand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 No it wouldn't, you illiterate tumshie. You're right to say that 're-entered the fourth tier' would suggest they'd been at that level before but 're-entered at the fourth tier' would have suggested re-entering a league structure they had graced before. Read the Uefa quote again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Read the Uefa quote again. I read it properly the first time. The quote said Rangers entered the fourth tier. 'Entered' has a sense of a beginning about it. 'Re-entered' doesn't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The DA and the Shady H2bs fan being unable to comprehend what is right in front of them, why are we not surprised. Why don't you elucidate? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Translation of the above .. "We didn't bother going after Rangers since they no longer existed". (deliberately expressed in vague terms to confuse and appease the rioting hordes) The whole statement has that air of not wanting to piss off the Rangers fans while still tipping the wink to the rest of us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 The whole statement has that air of not wanting to piss off the Rangers fans while still tipping the wink to the rest of us. Nah, it's more indifferent than that. It's basically saying that they can't be arsed taking an interest in this because of what subsequently happened. I don't think that on this occasion, any opinion is being offered on continuity at all, although they have recognised it in the past. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Hands up those that bought a Persistence Beats Restwelvetance T-Shirt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Philpany and the lads can't believe that uefa ignored the tax justice networks report (not a blog). Twitter's fun tonight. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 A UEFA spokesperson told STV: "As a consequence of decisions taken against Rangers FC in 2012 as well as the administration of the club and the events and measures that followed (including the club being ineligible to apply for a licence to participate in UEFA competitions for three seasons), there is no need for UEFA to investigate this matter any further since the club was not granted a licence to participate in the 2012/13 UEFA club competitions, the club entered the fourth tier of Scottish football and it was not able to play in UEFA competitions for the next three years in any event." Confirmation of continuity as well 'and it was not able to play in uefa competitions for the next year in any event's Why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 'and it was not able to play in uefa competitions for the next year in any event's Why? That question's never been answered before Wunfy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Njord Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 That question's never been answered before Wunfy. Don't think I've seen a uefa reply before. Pity you hibsd it otherwise we would've found out this year. When was the companies last audited signed off accounts? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted June 20, 2016 Share Posted June 20, 2016 Don't think I've seen a uefa reply before. Pity you hibsd it otherwise we would've found out this year. When was the companies last audited signed off accounts? Why are you trying to flog this particular dead horse? Your pathetic group of demented obsessives got their collective arse kicked on this issue. They tried to make a point about Rangers, spent thousands in the attempt and UEFA gave them short shrift. Just dry your salty tears with your £20.11 t-shirt. It's all it's useful for now. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted June 21, 2016 Share Posted June 21, 2016 Why are you trying to flog this particular dead horse? Your pathetic group of demented obsessives got their collective arse kicked on this issue. They tried to make a point about Rangers, spent thousands in the attempt and UEFA gave them short shrift. Just dry your salty tears with your £20.11 t-shirt. It's all it's useful for now. Lol. Nice whataboutery there Kinky. You know, if you were as secure in your view as you pretend you'd have no problem responding to Njord. Resorting to making stuff up and playing to a crowd of idiots (well, just Tedi in this case) makes you look like a rangers board member. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.