stonedsailor Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said: Nervous about heehaw , the result could go in our favour and I could not give a flying f**k . Which part of this are you failing to understand ? No matter the outcome this thread will continue with the same debates day after day , month after month and year after year Forever in denial. How can the result go "in your favour" neither you nor your club are involved in the case. It's between a punter and bookie. Edited January 12, 2017 by stonedsailor 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 12 minutes ago, stonedsailor said: Forever in denial. How can the result go "in your favour" neither you nor your club are involved in the case. It's between a punter and bookie. Exactly , so why on earth should I give a f**k then you have just backed my own point -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 2 minutes ago, Forever_blueco said: Exactly , so why on earth should I give a f**k then you have just backed my own point But it may prove the new club theory. Will you give a f**k then? Will Rangers appeal do you think? :lol: 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, stonedsailor said: But it may prove the new club theory. Will you give a f**k then? Will Rangers appeal do you think? You just said it did not involve my club , make up your mind please -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 1 minute ago, Forever_blueco said: You just said it did not involve my club , make up your mind please It doesn't directly involve them. They have no input. It will have a bearing on how many trophies they can claim to have won though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbycoxblue Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 I'm a dee so knoe a bit about relegation .. as far as I recall when we have been relegated it's always been to the league directly below.. not to the 4th tier 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Just now, stonedsailor said: It doesn't directly involve them. They have no input. It will have a bearing on how many trophies they can claim to have won though. nae bother mate , I will pencil it into my diary the now shall I . A dispiuted bookies payout , gies piece -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 1 minute ago, bobbycoxblue said: I'm a dee so knoe a bit about relegation .. as far as I recall when we have been relegated it's always been to the league directly below.. not to the 4th tier Courts don't make judgements based upon sports history. They go by definition of wording. I won't repost the definition of relegate, you can look back yourself. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 It's usually about this time that I post their own articles association and ask note be taken of the word synonymous. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnstoun Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 5 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said: It's usually about this time that I post their own articles association and ask note be taken of the word synonymous. That can't relate to Rangers, it clearly states they have 12 grand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbycoxblue Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Courts don't make judgements based upon sports history. They go by definition of wording. I won't repost the definition of relegate, you can look back yourself. Haha.. you complete fud.Courts might make a judgement based on sports history when the case is based on betting on that particular sport ..You can't be that thick... surely 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 19 minutes ago, bobbycoxblue said: Haha.. you complete fud. Courts might make a judgement based on sports history when the case is based on betting on that particular sport .. You can't be that thick... surely They will make a judgement on the contract. Betting slip in other words. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forever_blueco Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 21 minutes ago, bobbycoxblue said: Haha.. you complete fud. Courts might make a judgement based on sports history when the case is based on betting on that particular sport .. You can't be that thick... surely Please don't . Are you wanting him to post the definition of relegation screen shots for about the eighth time ? -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbycoxblue Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 Please don't . Are you wanting him to post the definition of relegation screen shots for about the eighth time ? Only if you want the definition of liquidation? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted January 12, 2017 Share Posted January 12, 2017 The Coral story is diverting enough, but it's still not going to decide anything. It's likelier to hinge on whether Rangers cropping up in the bottom tier can be termed a 'relegation' than it is on any notion of continuity. It's an interesting little twist though. Some terrific posts on here from Sugna. Some might call it fence sitting, but he's got to the nub here of the idea that in some respects it's a new thing; in others it's not. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sting777 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Anyway on other matters looks like money is tight at Sevconia Towers. Bad news with the Big Mike case just round the corner....lol https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/426188/celtic-withhold-40k-ticket-money-from-hogmanay-old-firm-to-pay-for-toilet-damage-caused-by-rangers-fans-after-5-1-game/ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottxs Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 Anyway on other matters looks like money is tight at Sevconia Towers. Bad news with the Big Mike case just round the corner....lol https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/426188/celtic-withhold-40k-ticket-money-from-hogmanay-old-firm-to-pay-for-toilet-damage-caused-by-rangers-fans-after-5-1-game/ If there was damage done to ibrox why has no one come forward to say what it was. Edit After all they love a statement or 2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 The filthy, thieving tramps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 7 hours ago, Sting777 said: Anyway on other matters looks like money is tight at Sevconia Towers. Bad news with the Big Mike case just round the corner....lol https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/scottish-news/426188/celtic-withhold-40k-ticket-money-from-hogmanay-old-firm-to-pay-for-toilet-damage-caused-by-rangers-fans-after-5-1-game/ 'It comes after a minority of yob Gers fans trashed toilets in the away end at Parkhead during the clash back in September '. Is that because they could only fit twenty of them in the bogs? Stupid and inflammatory reporting. Of course it was a minority - if a majority of visiting fans had gone on the rampage, they could probably have dismantled half the stand. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbycoxblue Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 The Coral story is diverting enough, but it's still not going to decide anything. It's likelier to hinge on whether Rangers cropping up in the bottom tier can be termed a 'relegation' than it is on any notion of continuity. It's an interesting little twist though. Some terrific posts on here from Sugna. Some might call it fence sitting, but he's got to the nub here of the idea that in some respects it's a new thing; in others it's not. But what if the judge thinks a new club cant be relegated?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.