Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

They're printing some article by Phil Mac fhdjdsjdhfjbhain about Rangers fans being a genetic experiment gone wrong, it's proabaly the most cringeworthy thing that he's ever wrote.

Don't buy the sun anyway so not an issue.

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone explain why the Scottish Football League website has Sevco as Rangers and not The Rangers, why they have them founded in 1872 and why they have a dead clubs honours listed

Because they are more concerned about retaining the financial aspect over truth. The authorities have formulated this lie to ensure the maximum revenue by not alienating fans of the tribute act . I would say once liquidation occurs they may have to change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.

The only problem with that quote is that it was 'fiction' :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can anyone explain why the Scottish Football League website has Sevco as Rangers and not The Rangers, why they have them founded in 1872 and why they have a dead clubs honours listed

It's good for a laff - keeps the Cevco wallahs on the hook.

Also if they former Rangers honours weren't listed it'd less of a hoot when when they are stripped :lol: :lol: :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They're printing some article by Phil Mac fhdjdsjdhfjbhain about Rangers fans being a genetic experiment gone wrong, it's proabaly the most cringeworthy thing that he's ever wrote.

Don't buy the sun anyway so not an issue.

This sort of thing is inflammatory and a disgrace but then I'd say point and laugh at anyone who took such ramblings as serious. Then again it is a delibrate attempt to keep a rivalry that is now deceased , no more old firm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with it all !

Just one wee thing though, Anfield is no longer as Stirling now play at the Doubletree Dunblane Stadium !!

He will recall Annfield though !! ;)

I might stand corrected as Wykipedia states Stirling's old ground as Annfield as well ! I always thought they had the one n !!

A slight distraction from the current topic , but carry on anyway !

It seems Liverpool is the single 'N' You have just got them confused. Bet you're not young.:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes. Another "unbiased" point of view from a ranting lunatic who left the NUJ before he was booted out on his arse.

Leggatt has very little credibility,no argument there but this was a blog put forward by McGillivan who hasn't denied it was him. It was crass and tbh shows him up as having very little credibility either. He has shown his bigoted attitude against Rangers supporters with such a blog.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Historically, on here, is this type of bet ever honoured? Just asking. I hope you both licked your thumbs.:D Bet ye, bet ye.

:unsure: I think so, did StandFree not recently post a screenshot after winding folk up about whether or not he had paid one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah yes. Another "unbiased" point of view from a ranting lunatic who left the NUJ before he was booted out on his arse.

He's now got to the point where anyone who writes anything against Rangers is a bigot and a vatican conspirator. Perhaps he ought to take a step back and consider whether his anti-Celtic hatred and disdain of the fans of other clubs is not turning him into a much greater bigot than any of the others he attacks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tell you what Youngsy, re charity bet offer.

If I am right I donate a ton to the charity of your choice, if you are right, vice versa.

The Rangers must die before the start of next season and no 3rd Zombification allowed.

*subclause 1 of 1 , as long as your charity isn't Cancer Research or RSPCA.

Oh dear, I'm afraid you've made a dodgy bet there. They'll just get Haudit and Daudit to look after the admin again and they'll carry on for ever more. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear, I'm afraid you've made a dodgy bet there. They'll just get Haudit and Daudit to look after the admin again and they'll carry on for ever more. :lol:

Not really, if they go tits up I win a shed load of cash so can easily afford the ton, if they last until the start of next season The RNLI get some tainted money.

Best result for me (financialy) would be they finish 2nd and don't go out of business :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leggatt has very little credibility,no argument there but this was a blog put forward by McGillivan who hasn't denied it was him. It was crass and tbh shows him up as having very little credibility either. He has shown his bigoted attitude against Rangers supporters with such a blog.

I agree totally. They are both an utter disgrace to journalism. (And that's really saying something when the media is stuffed with throbbers like Traynor and Young).

I just find it beyond belief that a bigoted blogger is berating another bigoted blogger...for being a bigoted blogger!!!!

Oh....the irony......unsure.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I will ask green where are you getting all the money to save on huge wage bills for Boca, Edu, Broadfoot, Bedoya, Boain and the rest and replace them with lower wage bills for Shiels, Black, Temps and so on, he will laugh at me like I am laughing at you

Are you going to ask Pacific Shelfs Chairman why he gets 22M from player sales and champ league money and shows marvelous ambition By spending what £1M?or perhaps he thinks he can realise your own managers dreams of guiding them to a CLF?with the current squad

Or is it the truth that he will bank this money to make up for the loss of revenue for the loss of the old firm games (source Radio Scotland)

Tedi

I like some of your posts but you are pissing into the wind here. You cannot use the savings on the huge wage bill as justification for the players you are signing. You couldn't afford these players before calling in the administrators, or during the administration (with them on 25% of their wage) as you still lost a fortune during administration. So if we go by what has been reported on the wages of Broadfoot etc, then you are paying these new signings more than 25% of what the other players were being paid and this dilutes the argument. Also, Boca is away on loan and there has been no confirmation that you are not continuing to pay part of his wages (not uncommon on loan deals).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...