aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Lots of bitter plastics then, I agree. To be fair to the other ugly sister, they've never actually marched on the bbc have they? In the bitterness stakes trifc really are world beaters. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 for the 54th time, I do not care But you keep commenting on it. A bystander without any preconceived notions would find you protestations of indifference hard to swallow. People familiar with the thread will just laugh. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 To be fair at least our march was legal. The 8000 complaints to the BBC were illegal? Really? Or are you just spouting irrelevant nonsense again in a bid to deflect? I think we all know the answer to that one. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 for the 54th time, I do not care You don't care that in the only cases where a ruling was made by the home association and the federation of interntional associations on the subject of the two clubs being the same shows they are not? Yet you are quite happy to claim the relevant authorities recognise continuation? Are FIFA, the SFA and UEFA not the only relevant authorities? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graeme_p Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Same old tricks from the Ranger ripping off their won charity. The Scottish Charity Regulator has now ruled that the decision-making of the trustees "constituted misconduct". However, it decided not to take action against any of the trustees. The regulator's report states that the Rangers Charity Foundation had three trustees at the time of the game - all of whom were employed by or held senior positions at the club. Why has the regulator decided not to take any action. If they have decided that the decisions making constituted mis-conduct why are they not pursuing this? The OSCR are a taxpayer funded service. Why are they not acting on our behalf to follow this up. Must be a conspiracy as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I could say the exact same thing back of course You could? Go on then. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty_Arab Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Boardroom must resemble the Reservoir Dogs showdown. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Same old tricks from the Ranger ripping off their won charity. The Scottish Charity Regulator has now ruled that the decision-making of the trustees "constituted misconduct". However, it decided not to take action against any of the trustees. The regulator's report states that the Rangers Charity Foundation had three trustees at the time of the game - all of whom were employed by or held senior positions at the club. Why has the regulator decided not to take any action. If they have decided that the decisions making constituted mis-conduct why are they not pursuing this? The OSCR are a taxpayer funded service. Why are they not acting on our behalf to follow this up. Must be a conspiracy as well. Rangers are dead, how can action be taken against them? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Yep that sounds about right, sorry stoney, you will not find me caring any time soon. Then stop lying about the relevant authorities recognising continuation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 I haven't lied, stop lying. You are a proven liar. You just make shit up and pass it off as fact, you confused yourself over UEFA and lied about FIFA and the SFA. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 where did I say the complaints were illegal, stop making stuff up Stop pretending to be stupid (unless you are really this thick, in which case I'm sorry). When you said, "To be fair at least our march was legal." you inferred that celtics complaints were not (since they were the subject we were discussing). Unless you were claiming Celtics non-existent march on the BBC was illegal but that would be moronic. Of course the third possibility is you were just spouting pish completely irrelevant to the topic in hand in a bid to deflect from your fellow supporters obvious bitterness. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Double Jack D Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Same old tricks from the Ranger ripping off their won charity. The Scottish Charity Regulator has now ruled that the decision-making of the trustees "constituted misconduct". However, it decided not to take action against any of the trustees. The regulator's report states that the Rangers Charity Foundation had three trustees at the time of the game - all of whom were employed by or held senior positions at the club. Why has the regulator decided not to take any action. If they have decided that the decisions making constituted mis-conduct why are they not pursuing this? The OSCR are a taxpayer funded service. Why are they not acting on our behalf to follow this up. Must be a conspiracy as well. Rangers are dead, how can action be taken against them? Who were the trustees? Surely it is their responsibility rather than Old Rangers? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 You said we are bitter about Rangers, safe to say we both know this isn't true Nice try and deflection though. Next time you should consider holding a protest outside Hampden and blame the SFA It was you who changed the subject to the BBC, not me. 8000 complaints 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Lots of bitter plastics then, I agree. Even now i still can't believe just how bitter towards us they are. At the end of the day it's only a game. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLip69 Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Can someone help me with my WATP acronym? The first half is 'Walter Ambulates' but I'm stuck with the second part. I'll offer a greenie as a prize for the best suggestion. The Plank 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aofjays Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Simmer I have done such thing. Well at least you admit it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 Simmer I have done such thing. http://www.haber3.com/besiktas-allan-mcgregorun-lisansini-aldi-1474663h.htm http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/21268775 I beg to differ, unless you can show eveyone where FIFA & th SFA say the two clubs are the same? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkey Tennis Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 (edited) Another fail for the bitter green yins.... In relation to the conduct of the foundation, the regulator concluded: "After careful consideration of the circumstances in which the decision to assign the charity’s interest in the agreement was made, we have concluded that although the decision was a breach of legal duties the circumstances were such that it would not be a proportionate use of our regulatory powers to take further action. "The decision to assign the charity’s rights in the contract was made in good faith and in the interests of the charity given the risk that otherwise the event may not have taken place, in which case the charity would have received no benefit at all." FFS Bennett. Stop trying to claim these highly damning conclusions represent some sort of victory for Rangers. You might have a point about the complainants and their motives, but the point is that Rangers people have again been found to have behaved wrongly, and displayed a disregard for regulations and procedures. It's like the FTTT and title stripping all over again. Rangers have been extremely harshly criticised. They've not co-operated with the inquiry. However, they've not been given the ultimate sanction and people like you therefore claim a kind of vindication and triumph. Fortunately, we can all see through it. Edited August 6, 2013 by Monkey Tennis 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 The Plank Hellboy QC? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted August 6, 2013 Share Posted August 6, 2013 FFS Bennett. Stop trying to claim these highly damning conclusions represent some sort of victory for Rangers. . That is not what i've done though, is it? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.