Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Legally and none of this club is separate from company pish Stoney, the Inter parent company can sell the subsidiary company "Rangers Football Club Ltd" intact as a going concern with all it's licences, players & registrations etc etc etc. What may not get sold is the assets where the parent company can just hire the assets to the now homeless bears club. But because the Ltd club owes the parent company PLC a staggering £16 million anyone who does buy the club will owe the Inter board the clubs debt and who would buy a club with millions of debt.

The spivs have played a blinder separating the club and company.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legally and none of this club is separate from company pish Stoney, the Inter parent company can sell the subsidiary company "Rangers Football Club Ltd" intact as a going concern with all it's licences, players & registrations etc etc etc. What may not get sold is the assets where the parent company can just hire the assets to the now homeless bears club. But because the Ltd club owes the parent company PLC a staggering £16 million anyone who does buy the club will owe the Inter board the clubs debt and who would buy a club with millions of debt.

Have you ever thought about setting up your own blog/website, there i believe is a niche in the market for a legal minded celticminded type expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Legally and none of this club is separate from company pish Stoney, the Inter parent company can sell the subsidiary company "Rangers Football Club Ltd" intact as a going concern with all it's licences, players & registrations etc etc etc. What may not get sold is the assets where the parent company can just hire the assets to the now homeless bears club. But because the Ltd club owes the parent company PLC a staggering £16 million anyone who does buy the club will owe the Inter board the clubs debt and who would buy a club with millions of debt.

As we know QC the club can change it's legal form, leaving one Co and entering another. RFC 2012 PLC are proof of this. Why can't they change into Rangers Football Club 1972 next admin? The credotor vote will not be an obstacle thanks to 16M reasons. The rules are in place to facilitate such a move within the SFA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I assume you actually mean "they separated the Ltd club from the PLC holding company" ? and yes they have played a blinder here. :)

Of course, "club" purely used in simplistic terms for the less intelligent rangers fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not possible.......Even if he got 30,000 to sign up it would give him what? 4 or 5 million quid tops.

To buy control, even with the share price a year ago starting to fall as well as plummet, would cost him many times this :)

Then add in the £30m warchest, and eh, naw.

Greenie for mentioning the warchest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we know QC the club can change it's legal form, leaving one Co and entering another. RFC 2012 PLC are proof of this. Why can't they change into Rangers Football Club 1972 next admin? The credotor vote will not be an obstacle thanks to 16M reasons. The rules are in place to facilitate such a move within the SFA.

I get what you have posted there Stoney but in this instance you are a tad off, only to the SFA and the SFA alone can a club change from company to company by way of a newco and still be the very same recognised member.

It is not a legal change in the clubs corporate structure but the SFA will claim it is with their fudged up and farted out new rules on how they view on what to them constitutes a club.

Rangers FC died and then the SFA cloned the club back to life so we could witness this miraculous occasion of seeing two Rangers clubs in Govan going tits up from a high height dying a humiliating and embarrassing death a few years apart. :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not possible.......Even if he got 30,000 to sign up it would give him what? 4 or 5 million quid tops.

To buy control, even with the share price a year ago starting to fall as well as plummet, would cost him many times this :)

Then add in the £30m warchest, and eh, naw.

to be fair, think sally said that when on the mortal kombats mate

post-26358-0-83990300-1398371560_thumb.j

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be arsed reading back through the thread but I just read the BBC article where Sandy Easdale talks about how the club wouldn't survive a 2nd administration. They didn't even survive the first!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be arsed reading back through the thread but I just read the BBC article where Sandy Easdale talks about how the club wouldn't survive a 2nd administration. They didn't even survive the first!

the club did. It was the company that died
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...