Fife Saint Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Is Susan Boyle being used as a political reference there? I wouldn't trust her to open a poke of crisps. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Archie MacPherson. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 keith jackson @tedermeatballs 3m Exclusive Q&A with Sandy Easdale in tomorrow's @Daily_Record. But that's not really the half of it. Exclusive Q&A, And that's not even the half of it? He's not running with the ALLY THE RULE BREAKER headline, is he? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Must be more to it than that headline suggests, otherwise it'll be one hell of an empty stadium. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Not even new Chucky sold it a while ago to Ashley. God bless you Sir Charles 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Maybe the board want Ahmed to finish them so the blood is on his hands. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Must be more to it than that headline suggests, otherwise it'll be one hell of an empty stadium. Why? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Why? Can you be a bit more specific? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Can you be a bit more specific? Sorry, did think that was a bit vague after I'd posted it, why would the stadium be empty? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Poundland FC Where All Things a Pound 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Dhenboy post progression: 1. Makes a ridiculous, raging spittle-flecked statement. 2. Is humiliated by virtually everyone else on thread. 3. Posts a load of evasive and smiley-laden pish in response. 4. Accuses piss-taker of being a Rangers season ticket holder. What an absolute atrocity of a poster. Actually worse than Seamus. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Thousands of celtic fans down at their local garages waiting for the record to be delivered then. Naw I'll just haunt Ragers Medjia for a good laugh. I think meltdown mode for some of them is imminent at the deal. http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=273380 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Sorry, did think that was a bit vague after I'd posted it, why would the stadium be empty? If the headlines spot on and it's as simple as here's the naming rights and here is a quid, then i'd like to think that would be the final straw for the rest of the bears. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Must be more to it than that headline suggests, otherwise it'll be one hell of an empty stadium. According to RM Ashley has the naming rights but still has to pay the club money for renaming it ? I vote for "Liquidation Direct" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bing (2) Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 The rage is strong already.............. Originally Posted by Grandmaster_Suck For fox sake! Originally Posted by bellevueloyal What the **** is this Originally Posted by johnny v Record back page Originally Posted by ajross36 surely be front page headline if true ... Originally Posted by grantanti What the actual. Originally Posted by INVERURIEBEAR Seriously ? If thats true then the club is truly f00(ked ! Originally Posted by johnny v Today is a special edition with Alistair Darling the editor. Originally Posted by HateleyScores This cannot be right. Originally Posted by The Peoples Piper Q&a with easdale tomorrow as he talks his way out of it. Shower of ****s Originally Posted by Grandmaster_Suck I'm afraid it is. Originally Posted by thetoptier When you take into account what he's probably already made it probably hasn't cost him anything - certainly once the onerous contracts have run their course anyway.sickening and horrifying. Originally Posted by HHSS Of course it's a play on the wording.FFS, I'd have given a bit more for my business name on it. Originally Posted by andy5836 I'm guessing it will be a misleading headline. At least I hope that what it is! Originally Posted by larrydavid The lastv****ing straw. Originally Posted by HateleyScores But would you underwrite the share issue Originally Posted by blueger Won't be back.Anyone going to tell me we need to avoid administration at all cost's? Originally Posted by Kirbys House Fuck sake.When does this nightmare end?! Originally Posted by truebluerfc Absolutely sickening 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 If the headlines spot on and it's as simple as here's the naming rights and here is a quid, then i'd like to think that would be the final straw for the rest of the bears. Im not sure there is such a thing as the final straw tbh. If they'll excuse me, our own Ted and 8 are akin to the proverbial lab rats going back time and again for the hit regardless. Don't think enough bears are actually prepared to follow you benny and starve spivs out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
actonsheep Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 If the headlines spot on and it's as simple as here's the naming rights and here is a quid, then i'd like to think that would be the final straw for the rest of the bears. Hmm, but if it was a choice of merchandising deal plus stadium name for a quid, or no merchandising deal then it might make sense. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Im not sure there is such a thing as the final straw tbh. If they'll excuse me, our own Ted and 8 are akin to the proverbial lab rats going back time and again for the hit regardless. Don't think enough bears are actually prepared to follow you benny and starve spivs out. I renewed my season ticket and gave one up. I am coming off the CCCS for cup games and have not bought any Rangers merchandise for quite a while. I reckon all in i ll spend £450 Follow Following this season which is about what i spent on a weekender at Peterhead. In comparison to what i usually put into the club in a season that is absolutely nothing. There are more and more like me...We might have renewed our season tickets but are hitting the club financially elsewhere or did you think we only put our season ticket money into the club? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 (edited) I renewed my season ticket and gave one up. I am coming off the CCCS for cup games and have not bought any Rangers merchandise for quite a while. I reckon all in i ll spend £450 Follow Following this season which is about what i spent on a weekender at Peterhead. In comparison to what i usually put into the club in a season that is absolutely nothing. There are more and more like me...We might have renewed our season tickets but are hitting the club financially elsewhere or did you think we only put our season ticket money into the club? Don't be coy, give us the figure, how much do you usually put in to your club, that makes £450, in comparison, absolutely nothing. Edited September 3, 2014 by dave.j 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
No8. Posted September 3, 2014 Share Posted September 3, 2014 Hmm, but if it was a choice of merchandising deal plus stadium name for a quid, or no merchandising deal then it might make sense. Ashley paid £1 million upfront to take 49% of our merchandise profit for 7 years. If that is true and those are the figures i have seen published then that is fucking theft on a huge scale!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.