Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

Surely they can reduce that burn rate as expensive contracts begin to expire

Now now, we have been informed multiple times that its not the playing squad that takes up the turn over....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is cal the new densboy?

Naw, I was just wondering how they are going to afford next season. A quick search of this topic brings up analysis of the accounts where there is more going out on staff wages than the player wages. 28% of turnover apparently. Around the time of mccoist and the 'i don't see contracts offered' and Kevin Kyle claiming he'd have played fore a lot less.

Seemed a valid question at the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Serious question: How does 4 (?) payday loans in a season not count as an Insolvency event?

edit for speellllin

Don't forget share issue. Though I think more than 4 loans, 2 by three bears, easdale and other bloke before Xmas and then you have the Ashley loans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between trading insolvently and an insolvency event.

Rangers are trading insolvently as they do not have sufficient working capital to meet immediate liabilities. Hence the need for short term loans to use as working capital.

An insolvency event is when that working capital is not available and a creditor triggers the event by taking the company to court for non-payment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a difference between trading insolvently and an insolvency event.

Rangers are trading insolvently as they do not have sufficient working capital to meet immediate liabilities. Hence the need for short term loans to use as working capital.

An insolvency event is when that working capital is not available and a creditor triggers the event by taking the company to court for non-payment.

Thanks.

it still seems that the SFA/SPFL are crossing their fingers and hoping that it all works out beofre they have to actually do something :o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks.

it still seems that the SFA/SPFL are crossing their fingers and hoping that it all works out beofre they have to actually do something :o

They probably are but at the moment there's no rule against standing on the precipice of administration so there's little they could do to interfere with the situation.

And, if you put the identity of the club that happens to be in financial distress in this case, that's should seem about right.

Punishing clubs for something they appear likely to do before they actually do it would be peculiar justice indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...