Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

The EBTs were managed by a trust, which had "no connection to the club/company" - I think that was the line peddled on here. So you're probably - legally - right. I leave the moral side of it to others.

This phrase has to be one of the worst legal jargon pile of crap that exists.

If it was not connected to the club why was it loaning paying the players and officials of the club big wads of tax free cash - Random Acts of Fecking Kindness ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This phrase has to be one of the worst legal jargon pile of crap that exists.

If it was not connected to the club why was it loaning paying the players and officials of the club big wads of tax free cash - Random Acts of Fecking Kindness ?

I don't know, you'd have to ask the trustees of the trust that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, you'd have to ask the trustees of the trust that.

Or just ask what connects the trust and the club - SDM,

the man that started Sevco on the path to destruction long before The Motherwell Billionaire Whyte or Chuckles Green,

and has left the mess that the bottom feeders like GASL King for the scraps that remain that aren't tied to pumping Cash to Cashley.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, you'd have to ask the trustees of the trust that.

The wee tax case was a EBT scheme why did the company owe £2million in tax for it when it was liquidated and not the trust? Why is the Murray group and Rangers PLC (IL) or whatever they are called still in court to this day disputing the Big tax case if it is the trusts liability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The wee tax case was a EBT scheme why did the company owe £2million in tax for it when it was liquidated and not the trust? Why is the Murray group and Rangers PLC (IL) or whatever they are called still in court to this day disputing the Big tax case if it is the trusts liability?

I don't know - and I don't care.

I merely threw the post below in because, as far as I can recall, the bolded bit was what was bandied about on here.

The EBTs were managed by a trust, which had "no connection to the club/company" - I think that was the line peddled on here. So you're probably - legally - right. I leave the moral side of it to others.

At the time this first surfaced I took the "no connection between the trust/club" with a dose of salt. I still do, apologies if people thought I was putting it forward as a serious proposition, and a defence for not administering the scheme correctly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooooh popcorn time, can this be the start of further chaos. When will Dave dip his short hands into his deep pockets, where's the warchest, when he paying Ashley, why hasn't he paid off mccoist yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...