entropy Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) If the fans don't buy the shirts then the Rangers have to buy the unsold strips. Is this not correct. Edited June 11, 2015 by entropy 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) After the good guys won I remember you claiming Ashley would be the better option. If that was the case why is he desperately trying to keep his contracts out of the public domainBecause he doesn't give a toss about your clumpany, but his people keep his commercial dealings wrapped tighter than Willie Miller marked Karl-Heinz Ruminegge. Hence he is very rich. Like Dave King, eh? Eta... Sorry misread your post... Perhaps he was the ONLY option, no matter how much you wished it weren't so. Edited June 11, 2015 by Ken Fitlike 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RossP Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 If Aberdeen ever went tits up and had to reform and the question was put 'what is the new club's official name?' 'The Famous Aberdeen Football Club' The way they are going... Aberdeen Caledonian Thistle. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The way they are going... Aberdeen Caledonian Thistle. Ground sharing history, I suppose... I hope my great grandkids enjoys the hover-rail away day to enjoy seeing ACT demolish Partick Third Govan Clyde FC. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I find it astonishing that Rangers, their shareholders and fans genuinely believe they can take on Mike Ashley and win. MA is one of the most notoriously ruthless businessmen in this country, I genuinely don't see where Rangers think they will either catch him out or appeal to his completely non-existent 'good side'. I was slated on here for stating something almost identical, only a few weeks ago. The guy is a ruthless businessman, who happens to be one of the wealthiest men on the planet. The money owed to him by The rangers is pocket money, as he's been know to spend that in the casino in a night, but he'll make sure he gets ever penny back. The response from the orcs on here, went something along the lines of; 'But, but, but............................. Dave king said..........' Ashley is the kind of man who will ruin Rangers, if they've pissed him off enough. I have the popcorn awaiting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 After the good guys won I remember you claiming Ashley would be the better option. If that was the case why is he desperately trying to keep his contracts out of the public domain It's not exactly uncommon for large companies wanting to keep it's commercial sensitive information private. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Podlie Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 It's not exactly uncommon for large companies wanting to keep it's commercial sensitive information private. Would be in the clubs long term interests if they were not public. MA putting the club first on this one 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 According to the published interim accounts Operating loss £2.8M loss down from £3.6M in the same period last year, if this trend continues then the loss would stand around £6.8m for the full year. Seriously Tedi, I love it when you post your back of a fag a fag packet finger number crunching accounting skills showing you up to be completely stupid at times. £6.8 million you say ?, do you really believe that or did you just go on a fishing expedition ? OK, let's start of with the easy numbers shall we, £2.8 million from the interim accounts and I'll add the rest on very slowly. Let's add the T3b's loans of £3 million and it is debt for the moment pushing it up to £5.8 million before we add in The Mad King's supposed £1.5 million plus Ashley's £5 million pushing the debt up to £12.3 million getting close to twice the debt you believe you think. Also look in the interim accounts where it explicitly shows there was £1.5 million in unpaid loans outstanding raising the total debt to £13.8 million and is now twice the debt you posted. We will now do another non recurring debt addition your club will not receive this season where The Mad King has claimed he will "overspend" from last season showing up the bullshit that falls from The Mad Kings gub. The interim accounts show the club received monies from the wee share issue of £2.8/£2.9 million and from the Commonwealth games at £1.5 million. Add that to the £13.8 million and the grand total The Mad King will overspend for the upcoming season will now top £18.1 million and any soft loans to cover June 2015 wages & bills etc taking the operating loss for next season to £20 million thereabout. That kind of puts a major dent in your farted out assumption that the debt will only be £6.8 million doesn't it ? The Mad King will need to stump at least £20 million next season to fulfil his promise of assembling a Premiership squad to compete in the Championship with his "overspend" statement. Let's face it Tedi, the clubs fucked financially. The Mad King does not have the finance to piss up against a wall and why he won't pay the £5 million to Ashley. King won't pay because it will financially fcuk the club with no ST money to cover Ashley's loan, it will be deferred or push the club in insolvency. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skiddy_ys Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Boycott! (Again) http://www.eveningtimes.co.uk/mobile/rangers/rst-call-for-total-ashley-boycott-in-wake-of-sports-direct-court-win-210021n.128745182 "We call on the hundreds of thousands of Rangers fans who have already stopped purchasing official merchandise to continue to abstain from an arrangement which benefits only Mr Ashley." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The rangers; more court appearances than trophies. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The rangers; more court appearances than trophies. They've had more managers simultaneously than they've won trophies... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) "We call on the hundreds of thousands of Rangers fans who have already stopped purchasing official merchandise to continue to abstain from an arrangement which benefits only Mr Ashley." Just the topping for my ice cream with jelly tomorrow. Must get a good sleep to be ready for that. Only one to go now. Zzzzzzzzzzzzz.................. eta Oh, and popcorn to start. Edited June 11, 2015 by cyderspaceman 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 After the good guys won I remember you claiming Ashley would be the better option. If that was the case why is he desperately trying to keep his contracts out of the public domain I remember the old Rangers did everything possible to keep their EBT contracts out of the public domain. Slating someone for doing something your dead club used to do isn't exactly the best defence is it ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
~~~ Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 "We call on the hundreds of thousands of Rangers fans who have already stopped purchasing official merchandise to continue to abstain from an arrangement which benefits only Mr Ashley." 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 The Rangers fans are so fucking stupid to a man. Boycott buying replica tops which will eventually cost the club plenty of money it sorely needs. The deal is done and deal with it, buy the amount of tops the fans need to buy and the club won't suffer, buy in excess and the club will make some money, it really is that simple. The only reason the deal is in place is because the club has been pissing money into the wind racking up the debts totalling well over £40 million in the past three years and needing surplus funding to stay solvent. It was placed into a precarious position and had no leg to stand on and had to relinquish some of their future revenue in order to sustain the debt driven business model. Any company in the world running at a loss stands to be shafted financially by any company willing to give it immediate funding in the short term, RIFC was in this position by their own doing chasing a dream the fans bought into and now they want to greet about it, Every fucker on P&B told the The Rangers fans this is exactly what would happen to the club/company if it didn't run a sustainable business model based on working within it's own revenue streams without the need to piss millions into a financial black abyss that is a Rangers FC to crack a nut with an asteroid. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Is it worth reading back through around 50 pages of Ps and Ds posting smilies? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
P45 Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Ashley has bitch slapped Fish Eye again. Love it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) Ashley has bitch slapped Fish Eye again. Love it. Really? As far i can see he wants shareholders to back him at an egm, yet kicked sand in the faces of those same shareholders faces and has shown those same shareholders that he something to hide in regards to his contracts. Maybe im not a big business guru like you are, so perhaps you could explain it all.... Edited June 11, 2015 by bennett 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Fitlike Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Really? As far i can see he wants shareholders to back him at an egm, yet kicked sand in the faces of those same shareholders faces and has shown those same shareholders that he something to hide in regards to his contracts. Maybe im not a big business guru like you are, so perhaps you could explain it all.... In comes Vicky with a late rally... 'This but a mere scratch....' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eindhovendee Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Seriously Tedi, I love it when you post your back of a fag a fag packet finger number crunching accounting skills showing you up to be completely stupid at times. £6.8 million you say ?, do you really believe that or did you just go on a fishing expedition ? OK, let's start of with the easy numbers shall we, £2.8 million from the interim accounts and I'll add the rest on very slowly. Let's add the T3b's loans of £3 million and it is debt for the moment pushing it up to £5.8 million before we add in The Mad King's supposed £1.5 million plus Ashley's £5 million pushing the debt up to £12.3 million getting close to twice the debt you believe you think. Also look in the interim accounts where it explicitly shows there was £1.5 million in unpaid loans outstanding raising the total debt to £13.8 million and is now twice the debt you posted. We will now do another non recurring debt addition your club will not receive this season where The Mad King has claimed he will "overspend" from last season showing up the bullshit that falls from The Mad Kings gub. The interim accounts show the club received monies from the wee share issue of £2.8/£2.9 million and from the Commonwealth games at £1.5 million. Add that to the £13.8 million and the grand total The Mad King will overspend for the upcoming season will now top £18.1 million and any soft loans to cover June 2015 wages & bills etc taking the operating loss for next season to £20 million thereabout. That kind of puts a major dent in your farted out assumption that the debt will only be £6.8 million doesn't it ? The Mad King will need to stump at least £20 million next season to fulfil his promise of assembling a Premiership squad to compete in the Championship with his "overspend" statement. Let's face it Tedi, the clubs fucked financially. The Mad King does not have the finance to piss up against a wall and why he won't pay the £5 million to Ashley. King won't pay because it will financially fcuk the club with no ST money to cover Ashley's loan, it will be deferred or push the club in insolvency. If that is true then it is disturbing. I don't know as much about my own finances as you seem to know about that new club. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.