Stu Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Fat Mikes lawyers now quoting posts from Rangers Media......... How much is he paying these guys? minimum wage on zero hour contracts? I'm not sure that was the SD lawyers based on this: James Doleman @jamesdoleman 2h2 hours ago RFc counsel now showing various newspaper and online articles that mention the 7 year notice period. Not an Daily Record exclusive he notes Here's the one about Rangers Media, which is just superb: James Doleman @jamesdoleman 1h1 hour ago Judge now being shown a print out from a "rangers chat board" including post from "trueblue92" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I've read that Lliambas was a rather unpleasant character. I've met him, he's an ocean going c**t.Anyway, I think anyone looking for morality and equity in the manufacture and sale of football shirts is barking up the wrong tree. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiddy Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I take it they still haven't found the Ibrox mole then? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insaintee Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 (edited) I'm not sure that was the SD lawyers based on this: James Doleman @jamesdoleman 2h2 hours ago RFc counsel now showing various newspaper and online articles that mention the 7 year notice period. Not an Daily Record exclusive he notes Here's the one about Rangers Media, which is just superb: James Doleman @jamesdoleman 1h1 hour ago Judge now being shown a print out from a "rangers chat board" including post from "trueblue92" To be fair Rangers would have won if their lawyers had printed out a few of Tedi's post from BRALT. Poor show by King's lawyers IMHO Edited June 11, 2015 by Insaintee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 No, you're right, it probably isnt. The split is the shareholding, isnt it? That means Rangers cut will come after SD have taken all their other costs off as well; store rent, staff wages, transport etc If we take the £3.50 as being correct, that would be 25% of the profit after SDs costs. I make that a gross profit of £14 per shirt, or 40% margin. If the share split went back to 51/49, Rangers would get just over £7 per shirt. To be fair, that isnt particularly bad considering they do absolutely nothing for the money Indeed. So why is it taken as fact that the deal is such a bad one for Sevco. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I take it they still haven't found the Ibrox mole then? Have they looked in Ally's gairden? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doink Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Ally was a great deal. They sang his praises. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Lol at the Liar wasting cash trying to beat Ashley in court what a fuckin clown 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Indeed. So why is it taken as fact that the deal is such a bad one for Sevco. Dont know really. Although, if the rumours of Rangers having to buy back unsold stock are true then it could turn out to be pretty bad for them. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 No doubt this has been discussed before, but can someone briefly summarise why Celtic are apparently still a going concern with no financial worries whereas Rangers, competing on more or less the same level, died as a result of years of spending money that didn't exist? Bailed out by an Irish tax evader. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musketeer Gripweed Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I think if the margins were in anyway that decent then SD would have no issues in these being public knowledge, our previous commercial deals have been pretty transparent. Thelionbrand @thelionbrand 3 mins ago SD don't want anyone to know it's LESS THAN £3.50 that goes to the club from a £50 top. There goes that confidentiality clause again. Will some people never learn? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyderspaceman Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Here is a genuinely funny post, IMO, from RM concerning boycotting 'the merchandise'. , Buying a new top could also suggest that you are proud to be a Rangers supporter and want to show it! Its becoming like a Monty Python type sketch where plain clothed rangers fans surround and call out another Rangers fan for proudly wearing the top because that means he is not really a true Rangers fan! Fcuked if they do and fcuked if they don't. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 You mean the daily record of breaking details of Fat Mikes onerous contracts right? Whos interpretation of contracts do you favour after today? Clearly Davy thought his was right on the confidentiality. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Rangers lawyers now quoting posts from Rangers Media......... How much are we paying these guys? minimum wage on zero hour contracts? Fixed that for you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Will any Seethco fan wearing the new fitba tap be seen as a scab? You couldnae make this shit up. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE KING Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 £20,000 legal cost LOL 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homer Thompson Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 £20,000 legal cost LOL I prefer to think of it as 5715 replica tops 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Dont know really. Although, if the rumours of Rangers having to buy back unsold stock are true then it could turn out to be pretty bad for them. Perhaps, but the general consensus is that the deal is a disaster at the profit split level, which your numbers suggest isn't actually the case. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AberdeenBud Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 Signed by his own people ^^^^ Was it? The Rangers Retail agreement was signed by Charlie and Co, was it not? Don't think he was ever employed by SD, but don't let the facts get in the way. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
printer Posted June 11, 2015 Share Posted June 11, 2015 I prefer to think of it as 5715 replica tops 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.