Jump to content

Big Rangers Administration/Liquidation Thread - All chat here!


Recommended Posts

I can take most of this stuff, even if the decision to strip titles comes to fruition, we will still follow follow, but there's no way I'll accept a sermon from supporters of C*ltic FC on criminal behaviour. That's some brass neck.

Asterisk!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You pathetic child......................

:lol::lol::lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because that was what Scottish Football voted to do with the confines of their own rules.

You seem absolutely determined to have the new / club old club argument all over again.

Why do you feel the need to have the same conversation over and over and over and over?

What will it change? and what do you hope to achieve?

Your really are a chancer, Tedi. :lol:

You posted

I have not deflected at all, the club was saved so your point is nonsense.

And when Thundercats called you on it, you accused him of trying to resurrect the new club/old club argument.

Chancer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dinde, why delete the conversation ?

I did mention that I felt like a dick posting it in the first place, and of course with no context it could've been about anything.

My morals must've retrospectively taken over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just the same as usual......get the binoculars out and scan the houses opposite to see what you can keek at.

Binoculars .

Have I been transported back to 1942? If you want to look in someone's house you aim a digital camera at the window and zoom in. That will allow you to take a picture of anything interesting you might see.

I thought you had been creeping on me for a minute there Kinks I'm glad to see you have the wrong man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd leave the whole "criminal" thing out of it to be honest.

The relevant facts are that Rangers deliberately withheld information regarding player contracts when registering said players. This was done because Rangers knew that their method of paying players might not be legitimate. The latest ruling says that the method employed was not legitimate.

Arguing over words like "criminal", or suggesting that trophies might have been won anyway, are completely beside those points.

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was disappointed in Graham Spiers performance on Sportsound last night.

He was right in what he was saying, but he allowed Richard Wilson to get away with some real rubbish. Like the discussion on here, he was allowed to steer it towards the idea of 'legality' of EBTs - essentially a red herring.

Spiers didn't counter with anything on registration, on side letters, on competitive advantage. The fact that Wilson was flanked by two monumentally stupid and ill-informed footballers, enabled him to appear to win the day.

Is there a thicker man alive than Paul Lambert?

Edited by Monkey Tennis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I said earlier, you are seething and lashing out all over the place, showing your true colours post by post.

Try answering the questions put to you before asking more of your own.

Is he still ranting about football teams not paying tax?

Can't be bothered searching back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was disappointed in Graham Spiers performance on Sportsound last night.

He was right in what he was saying, but he allowed Richard Wilson to get away with some real rubbish. Like the discussion on here, he was allowed to steer it towards the idea of 'legality' of EBTs - essentially a red herring.

Spiers didn't counter with anything on registration, on side letters, on competitive advantage. The fact that Wilson was flanked by two monumentally stupid and ill-informed footballers, enabled him to appear to win the day.

Is there a thicker man alive than Paul Lambert?

Spier's just repeated what his blogging pals have blogged and got hysterical whenever someone disagreed with them. Spier's just couldn't handle that what victor said was spot on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't seem as bad when I thought it, in print, not so good. :D

Aye you need to watch that, no-one can see you grinning as you type and there's a curiously low offence threshold for some.

For the record there is always a smile on my face when I write here, you violent-knife-wielding-rapey-c***s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spiers didn't counter with anything on registration, on side letters, on competitive advantage. The fact that Wilson was flanked by two monumentally stupid and ill-informed footballers, enabled him to appear to win the day.

That was all covered by the LNS enquiry. Do you really think that should be revisited?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was all covered by the LNS enquiry. Do you really think that should be revisited?

^^^^ its been heard and the punishments have been handed out for it. I'm also pretty sure that the SPL agreed that there would be no going back on William Nimmo smith's verdict.

Finito..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...