Bookies Love Me Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Catchphrases, nicknames, sayings etc don't have to have any factual basis - The Big Hoose guy must simply be the inspiration for the term. It doesn't honestly matter if he said the words or not. Then again, I'm sure I must be getting trolled here, noone can really pretend they think whether a catchphrase was said or not is actually important. Can they? Like kinkardine's insistance in calling sevco/newco/oldco/zombieco/(soon to be) oldco2 a FOOTBALL team. Everybody resorts with a bit of artistic license now and again. Ok, if it's the truth he wants then maybe we should stop referring to this "you tube hero" as "The Big Hoose Guy" and call it as we see it. From now on he should be known as "The Big Fat Michelin Man Type Zombified Orc Loud-Mouthed C*nt". On second thoughts, that's quite a bit to type (also the truth can hurt those of a sensitive nature), let's leave it as "The Big Hoose Guy" it makes him sound as if he's the lord of the manor, he'd be chuffed with that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dirty dingus Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 The cesspit of schit, the anti-catholic conference centre, the big hoose. who cares what it's called just keep playing them fiddles and watch yer sorry mess burn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I was seriously annoyed that Cevco Kinkardine 'I like singing "traditional" songs' managed to deflect this serious thread between Hoose and House. 14 posts wingeing the big lad said "house" - please keep this thead serious and don't allow Tedster or the 2 Bennys to deflect - I started a silly thread to keep it away 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowden0 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 BBC increases Sports Personality of the Year Award shortlist to 12 to reflect remarkable sporting year. Craigy boy ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FinnesTON Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 So, "When Charles Green called for Attention he didn't use the A word, he used the B word" is confusing. What word was that, then? Baaaaaaaaaaaa-ttention? Well Sevconians still claim 'We are the sheepul.' 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ross. Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Noticed this on the BBC gossip column: Former Rangers owner Craig Whyte is preparing to claim millions of pounds from the remains of the old club that collapsed earlier this year, saying the RFC Group he used to buy the Ibrox outfit held a valid security over the assets sold to Charles Green's Sevco consortium. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteRoseKillie Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Also to add was adviced to look at this page http://www.hmrc.gov....ual/ins1121.htm This shows in newcos case HMRC will be on them in an instant when they realise that they are up the creek which seems to be sooner rather than later Also with the hmrc website within the S423 Insolvency Act 1986. The new company can be held responsible for the old companies debt if any of the 6 following criteria is met: 1.Are the directors the same or is there evidence that the directors of the previous company are connected with those of the successor company, or involved in its management? 2.Is the successor company carrying on the same trade as the previous company? 3. Are the employees the same? 4.Is the trading or company name the same or similar? 5.Are the trading premises the same? 6. Did the successor company acquire assets from the previous company? Hope this clears up the they can't come after us for oldco debt as we are a newco 1. As the tribunal which originally slapped the transfer embargo on them stated, this would include "shadow directors", i.e. employees who, while not on the BOD, nevertheless have the power to influence the company's operations in an executive manner. The example given was that of a person who was responsible for the recruitment, deployment and disposal of players in a football club. Step forward Sally McMoist. So, without opening the boardroom door, or investigating Charlie's simultaneous ownership of both companies, that's one tick. 2. I don't think there's an argument here. Two ticks. 3. Massive redundancies followed by an equally massive recruitment campaign? Can't remember that in the news. Three ticks. 4. Ah, they might be OK here - they've stuck "The" in front of their name. Only joking, four ticks. 5. Not quite - ibrox is still slowly crumbling from lack of maintenance, and Murray Park has been rename... Oh hang on. Five ticks. 6. Not only assets, but history, apparently. Six ticks. Now, what the HMRC guidelines say is: The new company can be held responsible for the old companies debt if any of the 6 following criteria is met. So is Chuckie going to get the RFFFFFFFFFF to fund a QC to argue: "You said we could be liable if ANY of the criteria were met - not if ALL of them were". Then's there's the little matter of that banner across the Broomloan - where a more successful club would be able to sell advertising. Tick, and indeed Tock. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shull Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Contrary to what the Blue Vermin Boaby Sucking Media say, Ramorra will see the first ever Glasgow Derby match between Newcunto F.C. and Queens Park. So nae world record. Cannae wait till the Blue Vermin are Newcunted. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caleyjags1994 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 The cesspit of schit, the anti-catholic conference centre, the big hoose. who cares what it's called just keep playing them fiddles and watch yer sorry mess burn. I quite liked the term Castle Greyskull when referring to that place. Never mind at least its a listed building so it will remain, regardless of its purpose in years to come. Football Stadium, Shopping centre or.......... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 I quite liked the term Castle Greyskull when referring to that place. Never mind at least its a listed building so it will remain, regardless of its purpose in years to come. Football Stadium, Shopping centre or.......... Castle Greyskull is where the good guys hang out. Parkhead is Snake Mountain of course. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Yipeeeeeeee...what we knew all along 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alimci Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 From Attendere, past participe Attentus ("to attend, give heed"); Attend Was there an Emmanuelle film set in the Big Hoose? Must have missed that one 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 (edited) Castle Greyskull is where the good guys hang out. Parkhead is Snake Mountain of course. That always makes me laugh when they dims call Ibrox castle Greyskull. Edited October 19, 2012 by bennett -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobBairn1876 Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 3,600 pages?!? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old school Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Was there an Emmanuelle film set in the Big Hoose? Must have missed that one Slyvia RIP 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 1. As the tribunal which originally slapped the transfer embargo on them stated, this would include "shadow directors", i.e. employees who, while not on the BOD, nevertheless have the power to influence the company's operations in an executive manner. The example given was that of a person who was responsible for the recruitment, deployment and disposal of players in a football club. Step forward Sally McMoist. So, without opening the boardroom door, or investigating Charlie's simultaneous ownership of both companies, that's one tick. 2. I don't think there's an argument here. Two ticks. 3. Massive redundancies followed by an equally massive recruitment campaign? Can't remember that in the news. Three ticks. 4. Ah, they might be OK here - they've stuck "The" in front of their name. Only joking, four ticks. 5. Not quite - ibrox is still slowly crumbling from lack of maintenance, and Murray Park has been rename... Oh hang on. Five ticks. 6. Not only assets, but history, apparently. Six ticks. Now, what the HMRC guidelines say is: The new company can be held responsible for the old companies debt if any of the 6 following criteria is met. So is Chuckie going to get the RFFFFFFFFFF to fund a QC to argue: "You said we could be liable if ANY of the criteria were met - not if ALL of them were". Then's there's the little matter of that banner across the Broomloan - where a more successful club would be able to sell advertising. Tick, and indeed Tock. "Can". Important word there. In other words, it might happen. I seriously doubt it will though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 "Can". Important word there. In other words, it might happen. I seriously doubt it will though. Which is better than if it had said can't happen. There is the opportunity for it to happen. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Where did the herald piece on the floating charge go? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave.j Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 Where did the herald piece on the floating charge go? Someone had a fish supper for lunch. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymores Posted October 19, 2012 Share Posted October 19, 2012 That always makes me laugh when they dims call Ibrox castle Greyskull. It always puts me into fits of laughter when the Cevco claim it is only tics or sheep who detest you scumbags - 6.5 million laughs at the former Rangers don't lie! Happy to detest Orcs from Div 2 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.