MONKMAN Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 We obviously upset you. Pleasing!! My team won more trophies this year, than your club has in its existence Pleasing......... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stonedsailor Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Yes he undoubtedly lied when he said 'It was complete rubbish,' he said. 'I met Craig Whyte for the very first time a week last Tuesday in London.' Do the SFA have any appetite for holding him to account for this? no I don't think they do. But I think the vehicle involved changed when the CVA collapsed and I do not think this would have been illegal, I think the administrators had the right to change this without bringing it into the public domain. I think you might be right you know. When is the judgement re Green's takeover expected from Ibrox? Those shares might be worth a punt. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Don't think Sir Charles of Monaco gets oot that non-disclosure so easily. If SEVCO 5088 paid the deposit, and Sir Chuckles is on tape saying "you are SEVCO" then he was directly lying when he said no and everything is up in the air. As Tedi says, the SFA probably won't have the appetite to revoke the Associate Membership for the big porkies, so it depends whether Sir Craig of Monaco or that company he sold part of the company yesterday to do have the baws to take it to Court to wrest recompense. Just to be clear, Rangers are full SFA members not associate members. The club are associate members of the SFL. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 not according to yer own league governing body, i suppose some we daft QoS fan knows better than they do eh? mind if I just laugh at you? more arrogance, more triumphalism, more gloating, hope you enjoying it. How many more points did QoS get in 2nd Division than The Rangers in 3rd with a wage bill of £7mill? Honestly Ted, you want sally to lead you? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MONKMAN Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 not according to yer own league governing body, i suppose some we daft QoS fan knows better than they do eh? mind if I just laugh at you? more arrogance, more triumphalism, more gloating, hope you enjoying it. We daft queens. World record holders for pumping The Rangers out of the challenge cup more than any other side 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Just to be clear, Rangers are full SFA members not associate members. The club are associate members of the SFL. hahahahajajajajjejejeje - - that certainly clarifies things. So - to summarise, Rangers are SFA members, the Club are associate members, Rangers International own a company who owns a Club? Edited April 18, 2013 by NotfromFifehonest 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearwithme Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 hahahahajajajajjejejeje - - that certainly clarifies things. So - to summarise, Rangers are SFA members, the Club are associate members, Rangers International own a company who owns a Club? Try reading what I said again. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelegendthatis Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 To me, Murray is the most interesting character in this whole soap opera. The world of Scottish business is not the largest circle to mix in and it seems beyond the bounds of credibility that a businessman of long standing like Murray had no idea as to the character and operating methods of Whyte. It is another poor reflection on the MSM that Murray has been given such an easy ride over the sale of the club to a conman. Murray was told by Martin Bain at the time about Whyte. They had some thrown together committee to look at Whyte, but when they told Murray he made clear Lloyds were on his case big time. He stopped speaking to Bain after that! Anything to get the money to Lloyds and reduce his indebtedness. We have all paid the price to save Murray's neck. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wunfellaff Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Murray is the worst, he could have stopped all of this from happening. whyte is just an opportunist con man. Green is a dodgy yet sound businessman. To me Stockbridge is the most interesting. He was sent North in March I think, so involvement back then with green + white..... he could have tales to tell. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 No I do not, but I am a Rangers supporter, and Rangers supporters as a whole obviously get under Monkman`s skin, he is unable to separate them and wants every one of us to lose our club, therefore I have no problems being everything to him that provokes this kind of blind hatred. I'd ask you................blind hatred or 20-20 hatred. Sally needs a £10mill budget to mount a challenge on SFL2???? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) Nah he canny spend a penny, we have a transfer embargo remember. FFS Tedi you cannot be as thick as Benny the Ball who answered me that - £10 mill goes easily on Bosmans starting 1 Sept as you pay them as much as Sandaza a week with wild contracts. It ain't transfer fees - WAGES lad FFS - the bums don't know yet why they went bust - buying was OK but can't keep paying the bills every week wages + PAYE - I'm shocked Pieman TUPED on £20k a week - I wouldn't walk away either. Assistants? You're trying to get rid of a spare goalkeeper who is allegedly on £14k a week now your 1st team choice. Glad yer Season Tix money is being spent well. Edited April 18, 2013 by NotfromFifehonest 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Nah he canny spend a penny, we have a transfer embargo remember. Is he still asking that question No matter how many times it's explained to him, he just doesn't get it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Strange thing is, not only have they got Granny propped up in her favourite chair, and continue to serve her tea at the same time, they haven't even noticed she's beginning to stink - a bit like she used to when she was alive. Mother Norman, not granny. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 I think Green and Whyte did have an agreement pre-CVA, there is no doubt of this, however when the CVA failed I think Green saw his chance and screwed Whyte over, I think D & P were complicit in this and transferred those assets directly to Sevco Scotland therefore cutting Whyte out of the equation, once liquidation was confirmed Whyte became irrelevant. Will the SFA care that Green was involved with Whyte pre-cva? I do not see any appetite from the SFA to pursue this, might be wrong tho. One vital flaw there Tedi ! a CVA was never ever going to be done with the HMRC and was always doomed to be failure and the HMRC has this on their website "they do not do deals" unless you are actually a global economic corporation. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellbhoy Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Was the CVA presented? yes or no? There was one vehicle for the CVA another for the CVA failing. That's not the point though is it ! it was never ever going to be accepted by the HMRC and was just a smoke screen for a while.FFS it was in the MSM it was never going to be accepted and D&P actually knew themselves it would never get accepted but still punted the idea that they were in negotiations with the HMRC . EVERY FUCKER KNEW IT WAS NEVER GOING TO BE ACCEPTED. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
strichener Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Was the CVA presented? yes or no? There was one vehicle for the CVA another for the CVA failing. Not according to D & P who stated that there was a binding agreement in place with Sevco 5088 for the CVA and if that failed with the purchase of assets and liquidation. The question is who were Sevco 5088 and Sevco Scotland and did D & P confirm with the owners (all of them) of Sevco 5088 that they were happy to allow their binding agreement to be broken in favour of Sevco Scotland? D & P also stated that they couldn't deal with the Cardigan's last minute consortium as they had a binding agreement in place. Surely when this binding agreement was unbound then D & P had a duty to creditors to get the best deal available, including allowing Walter to have his bite of the cherry? You have correctly stated that D & P were duty bound to creditors only but nowhere have I seen document in any circular to creditors that another party had entered the fray and actually been able to purchase the assets. D & P are really in the shit over the whole episode, lucky they sold out to a consortium with deep pockets as I reckon that there will be future action taken against them by BIS and the creditors. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Is he still asking that question No matter how many times it's explained to him, he just doesn't get it. Gosh Benny are you still as thick. You can get 55 Bosmans during the summer to mount a challenge on 2nd Div Title. Still within rules on pre-contracts. Fat Sal is wanting the £10mill to start paying the wages from 1st Sept - not buying - DOH HOMER, do you know fitba or desperately seeking Susan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 One vital flaw there Tedi ! a CVA was never ever going to be done with the HMRC and was always doomed to be failure and the HMRC has this on their website "they do not do deals" unless you are actually a global economic corporation. What the f**k would you know about CVA's or HMRC? Ofcourse there was a chance it could have been accepted, i doubt Green then to all that hassle of gaining Whytes shares otherwise. You really do post more rubbish than anyone else on here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotfromFifehonest Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 (edited) What the f**k would you know about CVA's or HMRC? Ofcourse there was a chance it could have been accepted, i doubt Green then to all that hassle of gaining Whytes shares otherwise. You really do post more rubbish than anyone else on here. Given your obvious lack of understanding of why Bosmans are Ally's target and why he was asking for £10 mill, I suspect you're on here only to find a man..................seems As We Rise Again is free (on a Bosman?) Edited April 18, 2013 by NotfromFifehonest 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted April 18, 2013 Share Posted April 18, 2013 Yes Claymore Ally is spending £10million on bosmans. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.